Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New White House plan: Keep US troops in Iraq permanently.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 09:32 AM
Original message
New White House plan: Keep US troops in Iraq permanently.
Opinion

New White House plan: Keep US troops in Iraq permanently.

Fri Jun 8, 4:00 AM ET

Washington - President Bush used to be fond of saying that American troops would stay in Iraq as long as needed and not a day longer. He isn't saying that anymore.

The new word from the White House is that American troops would be stationed in Iraq permanently on the "Korean model." The analogy is a little strained. The United States has helped to mend the rift between North and South Korea since 1953. But South Korea has had no internal insurgency to worry about.

The plan for permanent bases in Iraq must have been long in the making. The president ignored a recommendation of the Baker-Hamilton Commission that he state that America seeks no permanent bases in Iraq. At one point last year, the Senate and House passed an amendment to the military-spending bill banning the establishment of permanent bases in Iraq. The bill went to conference and then the ban on bases, adopted by both chambers, mysteriously disappeared.

The building of four bases along with a gigantic new American embassy in the Green Zone on the Tigris River has been moving along rapidly. The bases will have runways two miles long to accommodate the largest American planes. The Balad base north of Baghdad covers 14 square miles. Another base is planned for the area that was ancient Babylon.

The new embassy, which will be the largest American mission in the world, will be complete with swimming pool and commissary. Retired General Anthony Zinni has said that permanent bases are "a stupid idea." He said that they will damage America's image in the whole region.

These huge installations must be intended for more than Iraqi stabilization. Former President Jimmy Carter said in a speech in February of last year that "the reason we went into Iraq was to establish a permanent military base in the Gulf region." And few are missing the point that bases in Iraq will keep American might on Iran's doorstep.

link


Bush's "as long as needed" always meant permanently.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. But when they ask us to leave, we'll leave, right?
Right? Hello?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Iraq is the goose thay lays golden eggs for the war profiteers.
Edited on Fri Jun-08-07 09:37 AM by tabasco
The war profiteers will not give up the goose until we pry it from their greedy, murderous claws.

No one should be surprised by this latest spin. They want this war to go on forever.

We bleed. They profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. NEW..?!?!?!?!?! Buhwawawa!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. precisely! . . . there's nothing new about this . . . it's been their intention . . .
Edited on Fri Jun-08-07 10:38 AM by OneBlueSky
since well before the invasion . . . in fact, it's been their intention since well before Bush was ever selected . . . it's all documented (either explicitly or implicitly) in the PNAC materials . . .

hell, the U.S. mega-embassy is a pretty strong indication in and of itself that we have no intention of leaving Iraq . . . not now, not next year, not ever . . . it's our foothold in the region, our operational headquarters, and NOBODY is going to take it away from us . . . especially not those pesky Iraqis (who, btw, own the land it's built on) . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. New Plan? What new plan? This has been their plan all along.
I believe that Bushco has always expected to have permanent military basing in Iraq; it is only now that John Q Red Stater is finally being let in on it. Of course they let on like it is all about "stabilization" but we at the DU know better.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Iraq is a springboard to take over the Caspian Basin.
and to remain a forward base to prevent anyone from taking it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. only in the NeoCon's delusions
it sounds like something hatched in the fading days of Imperial Rome...

...day' don't know da' Middle East well, do day'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Those pesky natives
Just don't know when they have been defeated. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. No surprise to anyone here.
Or even anyone who has visited the website for just a little while anytime over the past five years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. Nothing new about it.
This was the plan all along. This is why we went in. DU knew this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. And this is news? The only thing newsy about it is that they're now
admitting it! All any newsworthy organization worth their salt had to do was keep track of the collossal U.S. Embassy under construction. Did they think it was being built for the Iraqi elite or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. If the oil ran dry today
they'd be gone tomorrow....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC