Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NEW Intelligence Report Says Iraqi on Iraqi Violence Surpasses Threat to U.S. Goals From al-Qaeda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:18 AM
Original message
NEW Intelligence Report Says Iraqi on Iraqi Violence Surpasses Threat to U.S. Goals From al-Qaeda
Edited on Fri Feb-02-07 08:51 AM by bigtree
U.S. Intelligence Report Says Iraq Perilous

Last Update: Feb 2, 2007 5:00 AM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The situation in Iraq is perilous, with Iraqi-on-Iraqi violence surpassing al Qaeda as the most immediate threat to U.S. goals, according to a long-awaited intelligence report, The Washington Post reported on Friday.

The 90-page document came to no conclusion over whether the conflict in Iraq has become a civil war, but the authors expressed uncertainly over whether Iraqi leaders would be able to transcend the sectarian divide to fight extremism and establish functioning national institutions, the Post reported.

Iran, which the White House has accused of fueling the bloodshed, is mentioned in the document -- the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq -- but it does not focus on Iran, the Post said.

The report comes as the United States begins the controversial move of deploying 21,500 additional troops to Iraq.

A source familiar with the document said dissents were prominently displayed, a major change from the 2002 estimate in which the dissents were in small type and presented as footnotes, the Post reported. The 2002 estimate said Iraq had arsenals of chemical and biological weapons -- a claim that proved to be false after the United States invaded Iraq in 2003.

http://www.kfty.com/news/national/story.aspx?content_id=54f7fcc1-300e-492e-aec1-55b039b715ff


Maliki blames al-Qaeda is the main cause of the violence, not the sectarian war:

Interview with Iraqi prime Minister Maliki, 01/02/07: (http://english.daralhayat.com/Spec/02-2007/Article-20070201-7d5b35be-c0a8-10ed-0133-5b86f4b70e7d/story.html)

"I assert that what is happening in Iraq in terms of suicide bombs is perpetrated by "Al Qaeda" remnants, and the most dangerous acts in Iraq are being done by the supporters of the Baath party since they are randomly and indiscriminately killing the Iraqis and this is what happened at the University of Mustansiryia and Uluat Alrasheed and others… These political assassinations are meant to bring terror and to overthrow the Iraqi government. As for assassinations on the basis of one's sectarian identity they have been contained to a large extent and there are outcries by the clergy and wise politicians to put an end to these crimes. Hopefully this will stop soon and the efforts of the Sunnis and the Shiites will be united to face the remnants of "Al Qaeda".


http://journals.democraticunderground.com/bigtree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. The key word is "US goals", right?
Like a friendly government willing to do oil business?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. the phrase could mean anything in Bush's grasping mind
anything which would allow them to justify perpetuating their fiasco, if only in their own imperious view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Goals? Surely Ye Jest
Other than making $$$$ for the oil companies, military contractors and defense industries, what goals are there? I'm still waiting for some wingnut to clearly define what "victory" would mean. Where's the benchmark...what's the "Berlin Wall Falls" moment when we can all dance and sing? When do we throw the victory parades? Or is this an endless mess that gets more muddled as its incompently handled? The cricket sounds after those questions are precious.

Do we really have a clue about what Al Queda is these days? Are we still using a late 90's or post 9/11 model? I really don't think this regime has understood how this network operates, just as its never really gotten a handle on the mafia or drug lords. This isn't some conventional "government" but a whole different structure that requires a different type of strategy...one where 500 pound bombs and thousands of troops do little good.

It also requires an understanding of why we're targeted by Al Queda and others...a topic that few have bothered to examine...other than the forums here at DU, but need to be addressed if there is to be a true solution to this mess. But that runs counter to the monied interests who only care about how well their Haliburton and General Dynamics stocks are doing.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. all of those Bush goals are, in fact, countered on the other side
Edited on Fri Feb-02-07 08:43 AM by bigtree
by many different, pernicious organizations and individuals who actually reside in the Mideast as they resist U.S. expansionism as well as provide for their own exploitation of events to further their own power, influence, or greed. Some in Iraq have taken on the al-Qaeda moniker, and others operate in anonymity as they exploit and plunder. Bush is just another in a long line of oppressors who would rape Iraq for their own hunger for power and influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC