Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WOW! Faux Noise actually gets something right re: childhood obesity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
liberaltrucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 07:50 PM
Original message
WOW! Faux Noise actually gets something right re: childhood obesity
Experts Urge Blunt Terms For Kids' Obesity

CHICAGO — Doctors ought to quit using fuzzy terms to define children's weight problems and instead refer to truly fat kids as overweight or obese, a committee of medical experts recommended.

Less blunt terms used by the government and many doctors diplomatically avoid the term "obese." Instead, they refer to children many would consider too fat as being "at risk for overweight," and "overweight" for those others would consider obese.

<snip>

The recommended terms cut to the chase, at least medically, but don't mean that doctors should be insensitive or use the label in front of every patient, he said

"We need to describe this in medical terms, which is 'obesity.' When we talk to an individual family, we can be a little more cognizant of their feelings and more gentle, but that doesn't mean we can't discuss it," Washington said. "The evidence is clear that we need to bring it up."

About 17 percent of U.S. children are obese and one-third are overweight, using the committee's recommended definitions. Those numbers are rising, putting children at risk for diabetes, high blood pressure, cholesterol problems and other ailments more commonly found in adults.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,281332,00.html?=mcdonaldswhistlesnonchalently


:wow: Sometimes you got to give the Devil his due, much as it pains me to say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
durtee librul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. You mean it ain't Clinton's fault?????? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaltrucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, the Big Dawg DID visit Micky D's
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well of course cuz it favors a tough love approach
The right loves the tough love approach. Makes them think they are compassionate when they call someone fat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaltrucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Point is, discuss the MEDICAL implications
No "tough love" implicated in the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Oh I agree, I am just suggesting that the reason
the right is getting into this one is because the net effect is to back off of what they see as PC language regarding overweight kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. This story is not a Fux original. I read it this morning in a California paper
And it sure beats covering Scooter's sentencing or Harriet's subpoena.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaltrucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Mea Culpa-I just ran across it
Guess I shoulda done more research.

:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Oh no. You made a good point. Not to worry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Seems like information and better eating options would have more
impact than name calling but who am I to argue with a "committee of medical experts." :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Obviously, these fatties's problem is their obese self-esteem.
Take fat kids down a few pegs, I says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaltrucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Damn! I made the mistake of thinking GDers
Would actually READ THE GODDAMN ARTICLE.

Silly me. liberaltrucker is Lounge bound and down.

Bye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC