Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Global Trade Watch-Action Alert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 01:53 AM
Original message
Global Trade Watch-Action Alert
Democratic Leaders Get Earful, But Trade Deal Texts Still Secret: Take Action!

Fair traders in Congress are up in arms. They've forced a debate over the backroom deal to revive Bush's NAFTA expansions. But they need your help to kill it. Contact Congress today!

No one was singing Kumbaya at the most recent meeting of the Democratic Caucus, the weekly meeting for all Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Thanks in part to your letters and phone calls about the secret trade deal, there were so many angry Democrats lined up to speak that Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), the Clinton-era NAFTA czar who ran the meeting, had to promise to hold yet another Caucus session to allow more folks to express their views.<1>

We have a very short time to derail this crazy deal. Your voice is critical. Take action today! http://action.citizen.org/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=11380

It's not surprising that this deal is so unpopular with the Democratic Caucus. Since we last wrote to you, not a single labor, environmental, consumer, religious, public health, small business or family farm organization has endorsed this "Death Star" trade deal (PDF) that was announced on May 10th. Meanwhile, the Chamber of Commerce and other Big Business groups are celebrating the "deal" because it would facilitate more Bush NAFTA expansion agreements.<2>

How did we get into this unbelievable mess? A "deal" to add labor and environmental standards to pending NAFTA-CAFTA style Bush trade agreements was negotiated in secret by a handful of Democrats with the Bush administration. To this day, no one has seen the legal text of the changes to the Bush trade agreements. An official outline of the deal was released, however, so we know what is NOT covered — that would be 80% of what was demanded by labor, environmental, small business and family farm groups as necessary to deNAFTAize the Bush deals.<3>

Think of our current trade policy as a train heading for a cliff. The deal is like attaching one new engine (labor and environmental standards) heading in the direction away from the cliff to a string of 20 engines — the NAFTA-CAFTA model — going full steam towards the cliff!

It's especially galling that the legal texts of the proposed changes are being kept secret. While opponents of more NAFTAs wait for the texts, the boosters of this "deal" are out building support for their slippery slope to more NAFTA expansion — or, heaven forbid, more Fast Track trade negotiating authority for President Bush.

Take action to stop the secret trade "deal"!
http://action.citizen.org/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=11380
Yours in struggle,
Global Trade Watch

p.s. For an up-to-the-minute account of what's happening in Washington on trade, remember to visit our Global Trade Watch blog: www.eyesontrade.org
Recent highlights from our blog include:
Talking Points on the Deal
Skunks at the garden party
Ranchers and Cattlemen against deal, against Fast Track
The Nation Editorial: "Dems Sell Out on Trade"
Senate Democrats: "nothing new is on the table except a $5 Rolex"?
And on Alternet: "Dems Cut Trade Deal with Bush; Poised to Throw American Workers Under Bus" article by Global Trade Watch's Lori Wallach and Todd Tucker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is very sad but I believe its the Truth
They are in for a very rude awakening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I can't understand why the Dems think we want them to be just
like the cons. I thought we voted them in 'for change' not for status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is amazing. Does lack of response to this thread mean that
the DUers think this sneaky snakey trick is a good thing? Yikes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC