Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Todd on msnbc right now saying the Warner/Levin Res. says nothing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 03:32 PM
Original message
Todd on msnbc right now saying the Warner/Levin Res. says nothing
about redeployment (in other words it supports the surge with benchmarks) and says do not cut off funds. he was upset about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rundgren? Cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dodd? He was good
some passion that is sorely lacking in others. I hadn't really considered the viability of his candidacy until I heard him this am and just now. Vilsack was on MSNBC too before and was clear that we need to bring the troops home and do it now. I know little about him either but need to do some research!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't it amazing that now we are finally in power
and we have to go around and suck the republic's asses to sign onto THEIR resolution; what the hell is wrong with this picture???????????

surely, surely we could have gotten the votes for our resolution and made the republics go on record as voting against it -

nothing new, move on, nothing is changing here folks; we are being sold another bill of goods, and then we hear Hillary telling us nothing is off the table on Iran and how blah blah she is going to end the war in 2009 - JHC LADY - we will be in 4 wars by then and you won't do jack shit about it.
IN FACT, SHE WILL PROBABLY BE THE FIRST ONE TO SALUTE


NO MORE BUSHES - NO MORE CLINTONS - ENOUGH - AND IF SOMETHING DON'T CHANGE, WE MIGHT LOSE ANY POWER WE HAVE NOW IN 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sigh
It's irresponsible to take military action off the table. That only weakens your negotisting position. It doesn't mean it's your flrst choice. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC