Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

dKOS: White House Subpoenas by Congressman John Conyers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 12:31 AM
Original message
dKOS: White House Subpoenas by Congressman John Conyers
White House Subpoenas by Congressman John Conyers
Wed Jun 13, 2007 - http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/6/13/12144/9060


I wanted to share with all of you the reasoning behind a significant step I have taken in the investigation of the mass firings of federal prosecutors and the politicization occurring within the Department of Justice.

Today, I issued subpoenas to former White House Counsel Harriett Miers to compel her to testify before the House Judiciary Committee and to provide documents related to our investigation. My counterpart in the Senate, Chairman Leahy, issued separate subpoenas to former Rove assistant, Sara Taylor.

I consider these subpoenas to be essential because the evidence our investigation has uncovered points to the pivotal role the White House played in the U.S. Attorney firings. We have only sought to compel cooperation through subpoenas after more than three months of stonewalling by the White House.

I had hoped that the White House would be more forthcoming in assisting our investigation. Unfortunately, this subpoena provided the only legal means for the American people, through their elected representatives, to find out how their government functions.

This subpoena represents a very serious step by Congress not to be taken lightly. Defiance or failure to comply would run counter to the checks and balances that are the foundation of our constitution and democratic government.

Here is what we have learned in our investigation so far: ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. FIFTH RESIGNATION: Mike Elston, chief of staff to Deputy Atty. Gen. Paul McNulty
NATION IN BRIEF / WASHINGTON, D.C.
Another official quits at Justice
From Times Wire Reports - June 16, 2007 - http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-briefs16.1jun16,1,998255.story?coll=la-news-politics-national

A senior Justice Department official who helped carry out the dismissals of eight federal prosecutors said he is resigning.

Mike Elston, chief of staff to Deputy Atty. Gen. Paul McNulty, is the fifth official to leave the department after being linked to the dismissals of the prosecutors. In a statement, the Justice Department said Elston was leaving voluntarily to take a job with a Washington-area law firm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. A summer of hearings
It's like 1973 all over again!

Maybe Harriet or Sarah will be our next Alexander Butterfield.

Keep throwing those balls, people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Cheney at bat, Leahy spits on the ball and winds up as Cheney lips, "Go ....
Love the baseball analogy! :rofl:

I kinda miss Sam "If you paint a really good picture of a cow, you don't have to write cow under it" Irwin. The picture sure is resolving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
6.  would run counter to the checks and balances that are the foundation of our constitution
And eliminating Habeas Corpus would not? Or how about warrantless spying on Americans? How about Unitary Executive and Torturing detainees? I think ignoring subpoenas will just be par for the course...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC