Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Unitary King George Homeland Security Presidential Directive: an Unconstitutional Bombshell

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 07:22 AM
Original message
The Unitary King George Homeland Security Presidential Directive: an Unconstitutional Bombshell


As the nation focused on whether Congress would exercise its constitutional duty to cut funding for the war, Bush quietly issued an unconstitutional bombshell that went virtually unnoticed by the corporate media.

The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, signed on May 9, 2007, would place all governmental power in the hands of the President and effectively abolish the checks and balances in the Constitution.

If a "catastrophic emergency" - which could include a terrorist attack or a natural disaster - occurs, Bush's new directive says: "The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government."

What about the other two co-equal branches of government? The directive throws them a bone by speaking of a "cooperative effort" among the three branches, "coordinated by the President, as a matter of comity with respect to the legislative and judicial branches and with proper respect for the constitutional separation of powers." The Vice-President would help to implement the plans.

"Comity," however, means courtesy, and the President would decide what kind of respect for the other two branches of government would be "proper." This Presidential Directive is a blatant power grab by Bush to institutionalize "the unitary executive."

(((entire article @ link below)))

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=5853

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Congress seems to be uncomfortably silent
for having their oversight powers eviscerated by the decree of a man of questionable intellect and motives. What the fuck is their response to this latest abomination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Might those who think this directive won't be invoked, that George III will
leave office in Jan. 2009 be in for a rude awakening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. We've posted about this at DU since it was leaked days after it was signed and MSM & Congressional
Edited on Sat Jun-16-07 08:08 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
Democrats are ignoring it. I even sent it to my Congressman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yy4me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. In my latest call to my congressman, I brought up this issue.
In his e-mail response, he addressed individually my many concerns.

This is his reply to the Presidential Directive .


"Regarding the National Security Presidential Directive 51 and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20, I think your correspondence raises some serious questions, and I have inquired with the House Committee on Homeland Security as to any plans for congressional oversight on the matter. Unfortunately, to date, I have not received a response. Be assured I will keep you updated should I learn anything further on the matter. In the meantime, I continue to monitor the issue closely."


My Rep is John Tierney and he is a hard worker and has never failed to respond to my concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. proving once again, republicons HATE democracy and America
Republicons love elitist fascist royalist plutocracy --

They show that fact not with their taxpayer-funded propaganda, but with their actions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. When I first read it I called Ron Wyden's office and asked if he was aware of it.
They said he was and that they were working on it. I asked exactly what they were doing and the woman told me she was not privy to the deliberations but that I should know that they were aware and concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC