|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 05:56 PM Original message |
Downed Choppers - Saudi Citizens Funding Shoulder Fired Rockets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatorboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. But..But the Saudi's...Are our friends! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ktlyon (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. our friends that cut production to move the price higher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 01:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
30. Master betrayed us! They stole it from us. And we wants our precious oil back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ms liberty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
2. Funny how often our friends in Saudi Arabia keep turning up that way, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. ever notice that no matter how much the House of Saud screws us over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. more evidence linking Saudi Arabia than Iran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 06:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Good observation. Sunnis attack U.S. forces the most. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theHandpuppet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 06:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Well, look how quickly we "forgot" the Saudi-9/11 connection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 06:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Iran did 9/11, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananarepublican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 09:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. Yep! Gates reckons it's a slam dunk! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shallah Kali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 07:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. duped like this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. k & r -- people have GOT to understand the anti-Iran propaganda is BULLSHIT! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
7. One of the posts on TPMmuckrakers points out how it will probably end |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 08:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. Quite a story. When you piece together all the info that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 09:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. Wow. That's pretty heavy stuff. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 10:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. So much for the buddy system egh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 08:13 AM Response to Reply #7 |
35. This implies that "the Sheikhs" (Saudis) are supporting Sadr, a Shi'a militant, and the Sunnis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oblivious (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
40. "Sadr can not believe how stupid you are." He's not the only one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
8. So, when will we be invading Saudi Arabia? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 08:28 AM Response to Reply #8 |
36. If it was "all about oil", why wouldn't we invade SA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 09:02 AM Response to Reply #36 |
43. Because B*sh is virtually a kissing cousin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArmchairMeme (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
10. Saudia Arabia and hijackers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 09:21 AM Response to Reply #10 |
46. 15. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roamer65 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
11. I say leave and dump it all right into King Abdullah's lap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPisEvil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
15. Does this sound more and more like Afghanistan, circa 1980? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 12:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
37. I wonder what the shelf life is for the Stinger Missles the CIA gave to the Afghans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 11:46 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Less than 20 years, I think... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. So we'll be invading Saudi Arabia when? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 07:10 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I don't object to this idea in principle. It's just sadly impractical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. As my grandma used to say..."I wouldn't wait sitting on a hot stove." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
19. we'd better attack Iran soon.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
20. Are we going to blow them up now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
21. NO... those are Iranians dressed as Saudi citizens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
22. Well hell, now we must put Saudi Arabia on our bombing list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
23. BushCoUSA is a fully-owned subsidiary of Saudi Arabia. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
27. Kind of goes along with this detailed Post about Fundin from DU'er Today! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-02-07 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
29. Ah, so then those naval battle groups are for our assault on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
31. Please send this to Keith Olbermann |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 01:43 AM Response to Original message |
32. Should've invaded Saudi Arabia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 09:07 AM Response to Reply #32 |
44. That's why 9/11 was a de facto "false flag" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 09:14 AM Response to Reply #32 |
45. I know that you were being facetious, but why didn't we invade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Sorry to jump in, hawkowl88.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 01:49 AM Response to Original message |
33. Everyone needs to read this liberal Muslim writer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 03:54 AM Response to Original message |
34. What, exactly, is a "Private Saudi Citizen" ... Hmm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
38. The Saudis are just following Bush orders.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happydreams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
39. ATTACK! ATTACK! ATTACK!.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-03-07 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
42. The Saudi Royals told Bush they would give support 110% to the sunni's if the US. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 03:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC