Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Man Abandons Family For 28 Years, Now Applies For Dead Son's 911 Victim Comp Award

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 06:18 AM
Original message
Man Abandons Family For 28 Years, Now Applies For Dead Son's 911 Victim Comp Award
Get yer hands off 9/11 victim cash, she tells deadbeat ex

NY Daily News
By JONATHAN LEMIRE
Tuesday, June 19th 2007, 4:00 AM

The mother of a Sept. 11 victim is trying to prevent her son's absentee father from trying to collect half of the $2.9 million awarded by the Victim Compensation Fund, the Daily News has learned. Elsie Goss-Caldwell will be petitioning a Brooklyn Surrogate's Court judge tomorrow to keep her ex-husband from financially benefiting from the death of a son that she said he had little contact with for 28 years.

"This is not about money, this is about respect for my son," said Goss-Caldwell. "How dare you try to profit from this? How dare you disrespect him?" Kenneth Caldwell, 30, had been living in Brooklyn and worked as a technology representative for Alliance Consulting, whose offices were on the 102nd floor of the World Trade Center's north tower. After the first plane struck his building, he managed a quick call to his mother before the phone line went dead.

"He said, 'Mom, I just want to let you know that I love you, but I've got to get of here,'" said Goss-Caldwell, who owns a small notary business in Philadelphia. "He was such a nice young man, very funny, and very well-loved." Kenneth Caldwell's remains were never found. He was single at the time of his death and left no will, so his mother was appointed the administrator of his estate, according to her lawyer, Paul Bschorr.

But Kenneth's death prompted his father, Leon Caldwell, to try to reenter the life of his ex-wife, whom he had divorced in 1979 and not seen since 1984. "This is a craven and disgraceful attempt to profit from the death of his son whom he abandoned at age 2," said Bschorr. "This woman raised her sons by herself and she deserves the full award."

Leon Caldwell received half of his son's $50,000 workers' compensation payment but immediately had to use $12,000 of it for child support because he had not been sending $30-a-week payments to his former spouse, Bschorr said. "He was never there for my boys, physically, emotionally or financially," said Goss-Caldwell. "And it's so hurtful that he's trying to come back now just for the money." Leon Campbell did not return calls for comment.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/06/19/2007-06-19_get_yer_hands_off_911_victim_cash_she_te.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Shunning is a practice that should come back into style
I wonder what this deadbeat's friends think of his actions? If it were someone I knew, I wouldn't be associating with him anymore, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chemenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. His friends are probably no different than he is
and buying a few rounds at the local bar will smooth over any ill feelings in no time flat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Bite your tongue!
Shunning is a HATE crime--another "permanent" solution to a temporary problem. When applied in the familial setting, it's as damaging to everyone as the supposed "crime" for which the shunned stand accused!

However, because one might be known by one's associations, especially by those who take little time to judge persons individually on their merits and successes as a human being (note: RW X-tian Repukes), some new friends may need to be found when values clash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't agree....
...that shunning is evidence of hate, nor of a crime.

To shun someone who's behavior (as in this case) is this morally repugnant would be to deny any action toward them. Its the absence of any act, benign or malevolent. In the end its the only nonviolent thing we have as a species to control unacceptable behavior. And all primate social groups have used shunning effectively for millennium.

Even now, you could say that I shun Christianista's and other religious folk all the time. Not because I hate them, but because I see such people as complicit for many of the ills we see everyday due to their world view and beliefs. Many Christianista's actually condone, anticipate and/or look forward to the chaos and upheavals in society. And rather than holding a belief system that uplifts god's creation with the idea that we were imbued with the capacity to work these problems out ourselves (we are made in HIS image, are we not?), they believe that only a Messiah can straighten out this mess. A mess that the very same Messiah is responsible for making in the first place with a botched creation.

So I've found that it makes no sense talking to Christianista's and most other religious folk in a logical way about such things (BTW, I am not an atheist). So I shun them instead. I don't talk to them, nor engage them in any way if at all possible because eventually the words "Jesus, Lord, Amen" or some such other phrase will come into the conversation. They can't help themselves. Which only serves to tick me off further, because they fail to see how their beliefs actually are a part of a self-fulfilling prophecy.

So shunning in my cause can be seen as an act of self-defense against agravation....

IMHO

DeSwiss :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I agree...
...it should be employed right after the judge denies his claim. And if he doesn't deny the claim, then I'm sure he'll be able to buy himself some friends with the money. I doubt he'd have any otherwise....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. the greed in this country . . .
$30 a week for child support - and he would not even pay that. And he could not find the time in the past 23 years to even see his son.

I sure hope the judge settles this appropriately.

I am glad this cretin is getting publicity he justly deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. this 'man' might be able to get some
money- but he will always be the loser on this one.

as a single mom for the last 12 yrs, never having recieved a single penny in child support- having had to resort to welfare for a time, and still living well below poverty level, i understand what it means to struggle.-

If anything, i'd take this 'father's' actions as evidence that raising her child(ren) with out his influence was more of a positive- in the long run. And her words about her late son, reinforce this truth.

This 'man' has no idea what the 'money'he lusts after is lame-ly trying to 'replace'- and I don't believe he ever will. He might fill his pockets, but at what cost?- and to what real end?

Money makes life a lot easier- but it can't replace the truly valuable 'things' in this world-

the only value money has, is that we give to it.-

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. They should deny him any money
Post his face on every news show, John Stewart, Stephen Colbert and KO should do stories on this guy.
Make him the poster guy for useless people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. With that greed, he'd make a perfect Republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm sure he is
and I'm sure he is warming up his countersuit right now! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. he is no man, he is a punk
it take a whole lot of nerve to absent yourself on purpose from the life of your own child, make no attempt to contact them or pay a pittance of a child support order and then not only be awarded half of said son's $50k workers comp payment, but then to raise your gall to the point where you feel you have a right to cash in on your dead child's award.

He is a disgrace and should never be allowed any space from shame or odious opinion towards him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Unfortunately, he might have a valid claim...
... Of course, if I were the judge, I'd find some way to deduct 26 years worth of child-rearing expenses, so that the jackass OWES the mother, on net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC