Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think it's safe to say that the "New Direction For America" is officially dead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 07:39 PM
Original message
I think it's safe to say that the "New Direction For America" is officially dead
Darth Cheney has declared himself above the law. Herr Decider, naturally, just stood back and let him do it. And where are the Democrats on Capitol Hill? I see nothing of substance being done about this. If I'm wrong about this, please let me know - my heart is really heavy right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Henry Waxman etal.,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Words? Or are there actions to back up those words?
Anyone can talk smack about Cheney. We're doing it right now. But forcing Cheney to acknowledge that our nation is subject to the rule of law, not rule by decree - well, we're gonna need some mighty strong persuasion. Either that or actual impeachment proceedings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. actually...I don't hold out much hope
Edited on Fri Jun-22-07 08:56 PM by stillcool47
but Henry seems to be arming the Congressional Records with ammo, should someone, someday, choose to use it.

Thursday, June 21, 2007
Administration Oversight
Vice President Exempts His Office from the Requirements for Protecting Classified Information

The Oversight Committee has learned that over the objections of the National Archives, Vice President Cheney exempted his office from the presidential order that establishes government-wide procedures for safeguarding classified national security information. The Vice President asserts that his office is not an “entity within the executive branch.”

As described in a letter from Chairman Waxman to the Vice President, the National Archives protested the Vice President's position in letters written in June 2006 and August 2006. When these letters were ignored, the National Archives wrote to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales in January 2007 to seek a resolution of the impasse. The Vice President's staff responded by seeking to abolish the agency within the Archives that is responsible for implementing the President's executive order.

In his letter to the Vice President, Chairman Waxman writes: "I question both the legality and wisdom of your actions. ... t would appear particularly irresponsible to give an office with your history of security breaches an exemption from the safeguards that apply to all other executive branch officials."

A fact sheet prepared by Chairman Waxman describes other instances in which the Vice President's office has sought to avoid oversight and accountability.

Documents and Links

* Chairman Waxman's Letter to the Vice President
* Letter from National Archives to the Attorney General
* Second Letter from National Archives to the Vice President's Office
* First Letter from National Archives to the Vice President's Office
* Fact Sheet on the Vice President's Efforts to Avoid Oversight and Accountability

http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1371


Over the past five years, public trust in the federal government has been eroded by the rising
influence of special interests, the growth in government secrecy, the appointment of political
cronies to high office, recurring procurement abuses, the subversion and manipulation of science,
and retaliation against whistleblowers. Rep. Waxman and Democrats on the Government
Reform Committee have developed six proposals, articulated in comprehensive legislation, that
would help restore an honest and accountable government in Washington.

These six good government proposals are urgently needed to rebuild the public’s faith in government. But all six proposals — even those with bipartisan support on the Government Reform Committee — have been blocked from floor consideration by the Republican leadership in the House.
To read about the individial reform bills, visit:

• The Clean Contracting Act of 2006 (HR 6069).
• The Executive Branch Reform Act of 2006 (HR 5112).
• The Federal Propaganda Prohibition Act (HR 373).
• The Restore Scientific Integrity to Federal Research and Policymaking Act (HR 839).
• The Restore Open Government Act of 2005 (HR 2331).
• The Hurricane Katrina Accountability and Clean Contracting Bill (HR 3838).
• The Anti Cronyism and Public Safety Act (HR 3925).
• The Federal Employee Protection of Disclosures Act (HR 1317).
http://oversight.house.gov/chronology.asp



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Depends on if that new direction is down the toilet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And don't forget to FLUSH TWICE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Some turds just won't flush


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Sorry, forgot about ag the ag.
Better make that FLUSH THRICE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think the Dems are just letting Waxman do his job. I have not heard any Dems talking about it -ye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't this what all the hearings are for?
What else are they supposed to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The Dems have had six years to plan for this very moment...
An impotent set of hearings seems a lackluster response to Cheney declaring himself an autonomous state, not to mention a shadow government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. DicK is not above the law
There will be an accounting :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't think Herr Decider (as you refer to him) had any choice.
Of the two criminal bastards, Cheney is the organized one. bush** has been a screw up all his life.

He wasn't even supposed to be on the ticket. When Poopy asked him to find blivet a running mate, he appointed himself.

I think that if we could ever get to the bottom of that, we'd come a lot closer to being able to finally put the SOB in prison for treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC