Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FOLLOWUP: Penn Wiretap Charge Dropped In Police Video Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 12:08 AM
Original message
FOLLOWUP: Penn Wiretap Charge Dropped In Police Video Case
Wiretap charge dropped in police video case

The Patriot-News
Posted by Matt Miller
June 21, 2007 04:00AM

A case that attracted nationwide attention has ended with the dropping of a felony wiretapping charge against a Carlisle man who recorded a police officer during a traffic stop. Cumberland County District Attorney David Freed said his decision will affect not only Brian Kelly, 18, but also will establish a policy for police departments countywide. "When police are audio- and video-recording traffic stops with notice to the subjects, similar actions by citizens, even if done in secret, will not result in criminal charges," Freed said yesterday. "I intend to communicate this decision to all police agencies within the county so that officers on the street are better-prepared to handle a similar situation should it arise again."

<snip>

Kelly was arrested under a Pennsylvania law that bars the audio recording of anyone's conversation without consent. Taking pictures or filming without sound in public settings is not illegal. Brian Kelly said he spent 26 hours in the county prison after his arrest. He was released when his mother posted her house as security for his $2,500 bail. According to the police and Brian Kelly, he was arrested after a pickup truck in which he was riding was stopped by an officer on West High Street for alleged traffic and equipment violations.

Kelly said he filmed the incident and was arrested after obeying the officer's order to turn off and surrender his camera. The wiretap charge was filed after the officer consulted a deputy district attorney. The Patriot-News received more than 100 e-mails, phone calls and other communications from across the area, state and country in response to a June 11 story on Kelly's arrest. None of those messages supported the arrest, and several sharply criticized Pennsylvania's wiretap law, which is among the most stringent in the U.S.

more: http://blog.pennlive.com/patriotnews/2007/06/197281-wiretap_charge_dropped_in_poli.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Finally someone decides to grow up and become a REAL AMERICAN
and not just someone who works here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not only that, but one would think that police....
...would regualrly update officers about laws and court rulings that directly affect their jobs. This issue was settle in 2004 when in a similar case the http://www.rcfp.org/news/2004/1105johnso.html">Federal U.S. Court of Appeals, said "the police have no expectation of privacy while carrying out their public duties."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually police REGULARLY don't know even the most basic laws of their area.

I've had police tell me swearing, riding a unicycle, taking a left on red from a one way to another one way, and other things are illegal when there aren't.

Similarly i have had a neighbor discharge a firearm within the city limits and i have been told that it wasn't illegal when the law had been on the books since 1740 in that town.

Frankly in certain areas most of the police force would rather have the DA sort it out later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC