Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Most Overlooked Non-Testimony Of The Week, With Thanks To John Conyers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 04:04 AM
Original message
The Most Overlooked Non-Testimony Of The Week, With Thanks To John Conyers
Paul McNulty, Deputy Attorney General of the United States until recently testified before the House Judiciary Committee thursday. His testimony was related to the firings of the Federal Prosecutors but a fundamentally more important question was asked of him - and no answer was given.


43 minutes into the interview as recorded by C-Span Representative Conyers begins his questioning. His first question to Mr. McNulty is not related to the attorney's firings. Conyers noted in a brief statement that a number of subpoenas had been issued by both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees for various materials related to the attorney's firings and that he hoped that the White House would be responsive to them, however - and this is the important part - he said, would it be the Department's policy to assist in the enforcement of those subpoenas, would the Federal Prosecutors be called on to assist?

McNulty danced around it but would not answer the question.

If the answer is 'no' it means they will not obey the law and the law will not be enforced; it means we have no law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is why Conyers is great. He just cuts to the heart of the matter.
And yes, we have no law. That's what the Republicans have been telling us for years. Only they say as "9/11 changed everything."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
some guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's depressing,
but not surprising.

I kind of had noticed we mostly haven't had any law since November 2000. I'll make an exception for Mr Fitzgerald's successful prosecution of Scooter, even though that demonstrates only a marginal victory for adherence to rule of law.

Maybe Mr Conyers will decide the only option left is to move on HR 333, and we can see how the response to impeachment of Dick fairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. In this case, recusation is grounded on McNulty being investigated by Congress.
McNulty is one of the people in DoJ who is under investigation. Documents being sought include those from his office. Therefore, he has to remain at arms lenght. He is recused! Nothing bizarre in this, nor is he resisting a lawful order.

recusal, a legal situation in which a judge or prosecutor is removed or steps down from a case or action, often when the person has a conflict of interest such as a prior relationship with a party of the case or is a party in the case.

subpoena, subpoena ad testificandum, a written order issued by a legal authority to compel the attendance of a witness at a proceeding; disobedience may be punishable as criminal contempt of the legal jusidiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC