Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Transparently Bush - Lies About Secrets and Secrets About Lies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 01:07 PM
Original message
Transparently Bush - Lies About Secrets and Secrets About Lies
"I live in a transparent country. I live in a country where decisions made by government are wide open and people are able to call people to me to account, which many out here do on a regular basis.

Our laws and the reasons why we have laws on the books are perfectly explained to people. Every decision we have made is within the Constitution of the United States. We have a constitution that we uphold.

And if there's a question as to whether or not a law meets that constitution, we have an independent court system through which that law is reviewed.

So I'm perfectly comfortable in telling you, our country is one that safeguards human rights and human dignity, and we resolve our disputes in a peaceful way."



March 26, 2003
Release of Documents Is Delayed. Classified Papers To Be Reviewed


"The Bush administration last night issued an order delaying the release of millions of government documents and giving the government new powers to reclassify information."




March 27, 2003
Executive Order Delays Declassifying Documents


"President Bush issues an executive order delaying for at least three years the release of millions of classified documents. The White House says agencies need time to reclassify some papers that may compromise intelligence sources or reveal details on national security, but critics say the order will increase government secrecy."


March 31, 2004
A Clash on Classified Documents


"The Bush administration's uneven decision-making on which sensitive documents it declassifies has prompted criticism that the White House is selectively releasing information to justify its foreign policy decisions and respond to political pressure. Before the war, for example, the administration kept classified the intelligence community's significant dissents to the overall assessment that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. It later released those dissents, however, after the CIA was criticized for failing to accurately assess Iraq's weapons -- a reversal cited by those who argue such decisions are being based on politics, not national security."




Last week, President Bush himself rebuked Ashcroft for declassifying Justice Department memos from the Clinton era showing deliberations involving Jamie Gorelick, the number two Justice official under Clinton who is now a member of the 9/11 Commission, over how the CIA and FBI could share terrorism information.

Concern over the integrity of the national security secrecy system comes as a new oversight report has revealed a surge in secrecy: the US government classified 14 million new national-security secrets last year, up from 11 million in the previous year and 8 million the year before.












Secrecy in the Bush Administration - the report




Executive Order 13292, authorized by Bush, which amended Executive Order 12958, authorized by President Clinton.


White House background briefing on amending Executive Order 12958


"
Q: Hi. I wonder if you could just clarify something I just caught the tail end of. Would documents that have already been released now be reviewable again? Would all documents that have been released been reviewed once, or is that not -- or is that only in response to the seven-year period?

SR. ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Your question goes I think to the reclassification point, and that's only -- the point there is if something were inappropriately declassified, or if something happened that made it clear that something should be classified that had been declassified, something subsequent to the original declassification. Then there's authority to reclassify the information, but only if it meets the standards of course for classification. And that's really a protective device and is not -- the authority existed previously, and it is not expected to be employed often. But it's really a protective device. As anyone can imagine, there are going to be times when classified information should be, that has been declassified, either was done so inappropriately or subsequent information develops that makes it clear that the information should be classified."




Designation of Original Classification Authorities under President Clinton's Executive Order 12958. Stating that the Executive Office of the President does include the Office of the Vice President.

Executive Office of the President:


- The Vice President
- The Chief of Staff to the President
- The Director, Office of Management and Budget
- The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs
- The Director, Office of National Drug Control Policy
- The Chairman, President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board




Under Bush - Cheney removes himself from the Executive Office and Bush backs Cheney's reasoning.

"White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said Cheney was not obligated to submit to oversight by an office that safeguards classified information. Cheney's office has argued it does not have to comply because the vice president's role as president of the Senate means his office is not an "entity within the executive branch."

"This is a little bit of a non-issue," Perino said at a briefing dominated by the issue. Cheney is not subject to the executive order, she said, "because the president gets to decide whether or not he should be treated separately, and he's decided that he should."


Then Bush follows Cheney's lead and exempts himself.

The White House said Friday that, like Vice President Dick Cheney's office, President Bush's office is not allowing an independent federal watchdog to oversee its handling of classified national security information



Analysis of executive order 13292



Introduction

From 1995 to 2002, the government made enormous progress in drawing back the veil of secrecy imposed by the national security classification system. An Executive Order signed by President Clinton in 1995 cut back on the ability of bureaucrats to classify information and, most importantly, encouraged the release of historical records by setting a deadline by which officials must either make the information public or show that continued secrecy is justified. The 1995 Order was so successful in promoting declassification that, during the first six years after this Order was issued, the average number of records declassified each year increased more than tenfold, and more than five times the number of records declassified from 1980 to 1994 were declassified in just six years under the 1995 Order. Information Security Oversight Office Report to the President, 2001 at 3-4 (Nov. 2002) ("ISOO 2001 Report").

In March 2003, the Bush Administration demonstrated that it intended to take a different approach by amending the 1995 Order. The Bush Administration's new directive for classification is Executive Order 13,292, and it immediately displaces the 1995 Order, Executive Order 12,958.

Although Executive Order 13,292 retains most of the structure of the 1995 Order, it modifies many of the critical provisions in ways that encourage greater secrecy and allow agencies to postpone or avoid declassification that would have been required under the 1995 Order. The most significant differences between the Bush Administration Order and the 1995 Order are summarized below.

8. Vice President
The new order amends the definition of "original classification authority" to include "the Vice President in the performance of executive duties." Although the Vice President was not listed as an original classification authority in the previous Executive Order, a separate Presidential directive gave the Vice President Top Secret original classification authority, including the power to delegate that authority to others. See 60 Fed. Reg. 53845-46 (Oct. 17, 1995)(Presidential Order designating the Vice President and other senior officials as "original classification authorities")





The Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP) was established by executive order 12958 (section 5.4) to perform three primary functions:


- to rule on appeals from government employees who challenged agency classification policies
- to approve, deny, or amend agency exemptions from automatic declassification requirements
- to rule on appeals from members of the public who have filed requests for mandatory declassification.





Representative Henry Waxman warned Congress in September of 2004 of the impact Bush's E.O. 13292 would have on our government.


It's now 2007.

People continue to die because of the secrets and lies of the Bush administration.


How much more, America?










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. When I was young the country wouldn't have stood for this shit.
Now, I don't know. Having this administration steal two elections would have seemed impossible. Not it's just part of history.

What is the matter with people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That is the question.
It seems the many people are all too willing to take an active part in their own oppression - either by actively enabling through support of a criminal executive or enabling by pretending it isn't happening - or that all we need is a new President to make it all better.

Believing the safe and comfortable lies over what it is obvious - there is something terribly wrong with America.

Bush didn't happen overnight. That Bush was even allowed to take office shows that there is something wrong with our system. That it has been corrupted.

That we have some members of Congress that refuse to hold the Bush administration accountable shows just how wide spread the systemic corruption has become - and it is systemic.

Even more so now because of the Bush administration. Just look at the Justice Department and the SCOTUS.











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lot of good information in the Waxman report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC