Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld's Lawyer in 2001: "Take the Gloves Off" on Lindh

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 04:37 PM
Original message
Rumsfeld's Lawyer in 2001: "Take the Gloves Off" on Lindh
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003522.php

Rumsfeld's Lawyer in 2001: "Take the Gloves Off" on Lindh
By Spencer Ackerman - June 25, 2007, 4:59 PM

Apropos of the Washington Post's exploration of Dick Cheney's role in the development of interrogations policy, TPMmuckraker has obtained a document from the 2002 trial of John Walker Lindh -- the American captured in Mazar-e-Sharif in 2001 fighting for the Taliban -- in which Donald Rumsfeld's general counsel, William J. Haynes II, is said to have advised the commander of U.S. forces in Mazar to "take the gloves off" when interrogating him.

The Los Angeles Times's Richard Serrano, in June 2004, first described the document, a statement of fact by Lindh prosecutor Paul McNulty (yes, that Paul McNulty) entered into the court record, about the circumstances behind Lindh's interrogation. But to our knowledge, this is the first time the document has become publicly available.

In the weeks after 9/11, the Bush administration feverishly debated what was legal and appropriate treatment for interrogations of al-Qaeda detainees. The Post reports today that the effort began with allowing the CIA access to interrogation techniques not permitted under the Geneva Conventions, but that Cheney and Rumsfeld wanted military interrogators to have the same expanded authority, a position shared by Haynes. According to the document, months before President Bush issued a February 2002 order calling for detainees to be treated humanely "subject to military necessity," Haynes instructed military interrogators to "take the gloves off" on an American citizen. From McNulty's discovery filing:




(An individual identified as U.S. Army #6)'s understanding was that he could not collect (intelligence from Lindh) that could be used in a criminal court. After the first hour of interrogation, he gave the admiral in charge of Mazar-e-Sharif a summary of what the interrogators collected up to that point. The admiral told him that the Secretary of Defense's counsel had authorized him to "take the gloves off" and ask whatever he wanted.


As Serrano and others reported, Lindh, an American citizen, was "was kept in harsh conditions, stripped and tied to a stretcher, and often held for long periods in a large metal container." When a Justice Department ethics attorney, Jesselyn Radack, told a counterterrorism prosecutor that Lindh could not be questioned without his lawyer present if DOJ wanted to build a criminal case against him, she was promptly pushed out of her job. The case against Lindh eventually came down to a 20-year sentence based on a plea bargain, prompting many to speculate that Lindh's harsh treatment -- apparently approved by Rumsfeld's top aides -- ultimately scotched the chances for a successful prosecution on bigger charges than his ties to the Taliban.

"We know he was tortured," says human-rights attorney Scott Horton. "There's no beating around the bush. This is clarifying that the authority was given at the highest levels for torture to occur. The strong suggestion here is that it's Haynes doing that, and the strong suspicion is that the authority for him to do so comes from the secretary of defense." The further suspicion, according to the Post piece, is that the authority for Rumsfeld's attorney to have authorized the abuse of an American citizen came from Vice President Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. There were PICTURES of the guy in that container floating around for awhile
I think his eyes were taped shut, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've always thought that some digging into that case
might turn up proof of how high the orders to torture went. x(

I hope it comes out, and I hope history is harsh to the administration and everyone in it. If we can't fix what they're doing, then I hope they go down in history as warnings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. And THAT is what the "propaganda machine" allowed you to know.
There is such sadistic, barabaric horrors going on,...we will NEVER KNOW,...because the cabal in place controls ALL INFORMATION.

Imagine that. The BushCO/neocon cabal CONTROLS ALL INFORMATION that flows to you.

People say it ain't so,...but, it is.

Sure, we get tidbits allowed through the WALL OF MANIPULATION. But, even with the best efforts of independent journalists, we still get the CONTROLLED VERSION.

Think,...Stalin. Think,...Mussolini. Think,...Hitler. Think,...Machiavelli.

Think,...Neocon-backed BushCO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC