Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Think the worst thoughts of which you're capable. How Bad Will the Roberts Court Be?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 08:28 AM
Original message
Think the worst thoughts of which you're capable. How Bad Will the Roberts Court Be?
I can not even imagine where this court will take us. I don't particularly fear for any one thing. I actually *still* think Roe will stand. But its the smaller, more complicated, less easily sound bite-ed decisions that will come back to bite us VERY hard on our national ass.

I'm not even particularly concerned about anything now on ours or the court's radar. My concern is five or ten or twenty years hence, when young men like Alito and Roberts are old, curmudgeonly, and sexually impotent. Just how bad will be their decisions then and just how tragic will be the sum of all their decisions to then?

All the Democratic Congresses and Presidencies cannot fight what this court can inflict on our nation.

You know who to 'thank' for this pox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. So bad the next Democratic President and Senate will be forced to pack the court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. When I read Matthew Krell's analysis of just what the Court has actually done...
Edited on Tue Jun-26-07 08:33 AM by Heaven and Earth
it made me furious. Our poor Constitution is being defaced by those scoundrels. According to the Supreme Court, "if the president does it, that means it is not illegal" is now the law of the land, and that will live on as long as Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Roberts, and Kennedy are all on the court. Bush might as well have nominated graffiti artists, two-year-olds with crayons, or the ghost of Richard Nixon. It'd have had the same effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Two-year-olds with crayons would have been more honest...
...and probably know more about the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think Roe v. Wade will survive the end of the boy king's term.
It has been their agenda all along to overturn it.

This court is scaring the shit out of me. Limiting free speech, returning women to the dark ages
and using taxpayer money to support religious ogranizations - this is a theocracy in action.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. From one old broad to another, I agree.
But I have to add this: I think that Georgie and this SCOTUS are trying to divide this country into 2 classes; 5% rich & powerful, and the rest of us living in the streets & abandoned buildings, wearing rags for clothes, scrounging for food everywhere, our babies dying from disease.....

Where is Mighty Mouse when we need him????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. 5 %
Is too high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. Incorrect
Republicans do not want to end abortion.
Just like they don't want to fix immigration
Just like they don't want to treat terrorism like a crime rather than an act of war.

Republicans and their Dem sellout friends have held power in this country for going on thirty years. They have made no effective inroads to closing off these issues. They're far too profitable to the Republicans to risk. Instread they will complicate things and make false gestures - a 400 mile chain link fence here, a parental notification law there. But they will not ever, ever resolve their "big issues". Too many on the right vote republican solely because of these issues, to lose them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. We know what the Federalist Society wants so what is to guess about
If you think Bush* has fucked America you ain't seen nothing yet. They will be with us for quite some time also. Remember Alito and Roberts are both young and will still be on the court when your grandchildren have children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. It ain't about Roe ...
Not one iota ... And, they will not overturn it ... Roe is simply TOO important to republican party ... They reverse it, they lose the fire that drives half of their mindless sheep into the voting booths ...

Getting two ROCK solid, YOUNG, ideologues into the court was one of the prime objectives of the Bushco scam ... All the never ending crape about "activist judges" as code for overturning Roe for their idiot base, which of course the MSM carried water for was just pretense ...

This was about creating imperial presidencies and corporate facism ... THAT is what Roberts and Alito were about ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. I really don't have to think very hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. My husband & I spoke of this last night.
We see a very grim future for this country. I think yesterday's rulings will have an accelerating effect on our decline. I haven't felt this sick since 12/12/00.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. Unitary Executive. Corporate personhood. n/t
Edited on Tue Jun-26-07 09:11 AM by rucky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. The next sane President can do what FDR tried in '37
Edited on Tue Jun-26-07 09:13 AM by Solly Mack
Otherwise, brace yourself.

Desperate times, desperate measures and all that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. The next President had better have guts made of iron--he'll have to do it
but he will be absolutely reamed in the MSM for doing so, but it's absolutely the ONLY thing that can save our democracy.

Gad. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. The Worst? Easy! It Will be "Long Lived"
That's what scares me the most - it will last for the next 40 years. Who in hell knows what will come up in that time, but it sure won't be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disndat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Bush team
must be laughing in triumph. DUers can call them all the names we can think of, they've won their number one goal, not to mention the taxpayers money, for decades to come. This is the angry white males' counter revolution to Civil Rights, women's rights, and all the hard fought rights in the last 50 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Your last sentence sums it up. Gad, I fear for my son.
If I'd had any idea that things would become what they are now, I would not have had a child.

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
16.  Dem powerstructure rolled over in 2002, 2004, and on Alito and Iraq withdrawal
in 2006 because they had their sights set on 2008.

Gee - just because Alito was the fascist seal BushInc needed was no reason to stop him - no, better keep the powder dry for 2008 and the undermining of REAL Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. I love you
I really mean that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Coming from a LONGTIME PATRIOT-CITIZEN Democrat like you means alot.
Humbly accepted by one who hasn't even come CLOSE to the level of activism against BushInc that YOU have displayed your entire life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. I'm concerned with the Constitutional amendments that "get in the way."
It's easier to chip away at the C enough that eventually it collapses without a push.

Roe will stand--although we'll have decisions that nibble at it, it's simply too convenient a tool for the RRRepublican Party for it to go away completely.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Chip, chip chip .....
... then death by a thousand cuts. All overseen by two quiet, retiring, arch conservatives. All photogenic and kindly and American looking. No growling, snarling, Delay types ..... just ..... Alito ...... and Roberts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. The next prez will have to have guts of iron and a Bushlike unconcern for public opinion.
Seriously--s/he will have to try to pack the court and I can see the spin now: As the prez tries to right some of the SCOTUS wrongs, the RRRwong will attack him/her for messing with the SCOTUS and "their" version of the Constitution.

Fuck. I'm no longer light on the issue; I fear for my 10 year old son.

Crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
23. Watch as we get Roberts VOLUNTARILY in front of the cameras, too.
Shredding the Constitution but smiling that beatific, deadly smile all the while...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. You pegged 'ol Justice John ......
He's Stepfordian in his demeanor and his whole family seems to be one of plastic. I know we're not supposed to go after families, but he trotted them out and they came across as pure, high petroleum plastic.

He and his court are, as you say, THE NUMBER ONE ISSUE for the mid to long term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
24. Kick for more discussion. SCOTUS is THE issue for me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. Kick with a sigh--this is the biggest danger out there, gang. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
28. It's going to be rough, before it gets better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I agree with your general posit in a general way.
I am concerned, however, in that your posit (bad decisions will be overturned or ignored) takes a very long time. I'm not even looking for instant gratification here (well, I am ... but you know what I mean), but my concern is that the time it will take until the court again turns a bit more liberal is measured in lifetimes, not months or years or even presidential terms.

I see only two ways out of this:

1) Impeach at least one Supreme (not very likely)

2) Pack the court (more likely, based, if nothing else, on the increase in our population).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. And (3)
Let their decisions run their course and end conservative oppression for many generations, because a backlash will occur once Republicans realize that the conservative courts are all about creating police states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
29. I want another woman on the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. **AT LEAST** one more ... two would be better than one.
As I said in my OP, my current sense of things is that Roe will stand. Putting a woman or two on the court, in addition to getting the benefit of a woman's sensibilities, might help to ensure Roe stays as law.

That said .... there are woman jurists and there are right-wing-wacko women jurists. I'll give the nod to the non right-wing-wacko women jurists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Of course.... I'm looking for another Ruth Bader Ginsberg!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. Rubber stamp the dismantling of our Democracy and "legitimize" a totalitarian fascist state
with all that a totalitarian fascist state entails. See or read The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC