Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN "debates": Is sexual orientation a choice?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:24 AM
Original message
CNN "debates": Is sexual orientation a choice?
I don't recall choosing to be attracted to women. My hormones did that for me.

I'm tired of the mainstream media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. we've had the answer for how long now? Media--start doing your job
and report the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Hey, the media have to report 'both sides' of the question:
they have to hear from both scientific knowledge and ideological fantasy.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Are they talking about if heterosexuality is a "choice" too?
Because that is a sexual orientation as well.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. I know I made a choice
To ignore what the hell morons say about it being a choice.

I was born gay and that's that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. "A" choice?
Sexual orientation is far too complex to be trivialized as "a" choice, if choice ever enters into it at all. While I suspect that there's some malleability, I doubt that anyone has the necessary detachment to "choose." As members of a social species, we are the result of a billion choices, only some of which were our own, not to mention a nigh-infinite number of random events.

We have no business pretending that it's been figured out, and people looking to assign blame are trebly suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. That question is such a tired load of horseshit.
Here's the answer, CNN.

Sexual orientation is NOT a choice. And it is pure, grade-A bullshit to suggest that it it a choice.

Period, end of discussion.

Now, on to more important things, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MotorCityMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. The only "choice" involves being true to yourself
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 12:19 PM by MotorCityMan
and your nature, or to suppress your feelings and become what society wants/expects you to become.

Devil's Advocate: But, MotorCityMan, it is in some people's nature's to be rapists/murderers/republicans. How is it any different?

MotorCityMan: Well, rapists/murderers/republicans are a danger to others. Identifying as a homosexual does not, in and of itself, harm anyone.

Gay History/Pride Month 2007, and "America's Most Trusted" :sarcasm: tv network is STILL debating this?!?!?!

I swear, if they ever stop pushing how "controversial" it is to be gay, and get to the point where it is no big deal (which I think will happen eventually, but probably not in my lifetime), all the right wing "religions" will have to disband, as the "gay threat" is one of their biggest fund raising scams.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. So the answer to this
question will be debated and decided by people who have "no agenda" and/or no clue? Is this really something that should be up for debate? Oh yes, I forgot. Science has been debunked, the earth is 6,000 years old and men had dinosaurs for pets. It is a "moral" issue.

Sure, lets let the mobs decide shall we? :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obnoxiousdrunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. John Kery answered
that question perfectly in 04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. And what was that answer?
Enquiring minds....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC