Breaking on MSNBC: Subpoenas sent to WH, Cheney,

Edit to add link (thanks, cal04!):

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070627/ap_on_go_pr_wh/eavesdropping_subpoenas

White House, Cheney's office, subpoenaed

By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer 12 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenaed the White House and Vice President Dick Cheney's office Wednesday for documents relating to President Bush's warrant-free eavesdropping program.

Also named in subpoenas signed by committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., were the Justice Department and the National Security Council.

The committee wants documents that might shed light on internal squabbles within the administration over the legality of the program, said a congressional official speaking on condition of anonymity because the subpoenas had not been made public.

Leahy's committee authorized the subpoenas previously as part of its sweeping investigation into how much influence the White House exerts over the Justice Department and its chief, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

The probe, in its sixth month, began with an investigation into whether administration officials ordered the firings of eight federal prosecutors, for political reasons.

more...

charges.

:rofl:

At least they are not showing contempt for all the tubes that make up the many internets.

I can't provide a list of comments made about this - but there may be a possibility that they are using a public-free one. Or working on it. Rumsfeld quotes somewhere. George may have slipped and goofed about plural nets, may not be the fool that made him look like?

because Leahy has been starting to look like Mr. Furious, who gets really, really angry but can't actually do anything about it.

All Harry Reid can do is throw forks and spoons.

And then there's our friend Joe Lieberman, who might be better known as "The Shoveler."

If only Janeane Garofalo would show up and start launching some bowling balls.

they'll just ignore these too.

to go get them.

:kick:

Terror like you've never experienced!

Du has to be the biggest collection of great movie fans in the universe.

not the Justice Dept. Anyone here know for sure?

Contempt is max one year in jail and $10,000 fine per non-response.

The penalty, in terms of political cost, is the real leverage. The high cost of flaunting the law is being sent packing by the electorate.

its required by LAW

That is all from the Word Usage Police. Have a good night.

Courtesy of the Grammar Nazis.

It is possible and unlikely. But yes, Capital police can pick up and jail the offender until the end of the Session. It would put criminals behind bars and may have to be resurrected.

better than the term "administration". Using the latter term is like using the word "incompetence": Both mischaracterize and miss the essence of (and risk 'covering up') a deliberate, strategic negligence for ulterior purposes, i.e. for creating and using chaos and disorder to assist in establishing "alternate realities"...like exploiting 9/11 as a basis for "war against Iraq" (and "domestic surveillance")...which in turn is used for draining the US treasury, which -- along with 'sticking to principle' of continued annual tax cuts for the wealthy -- is used as economic leverage against funding of government programs and political leverage for promotion of privatization.

What is lost in the "slick" rovian-norquistian political-economic equation are the inhumane deaths, maimings and disruptions of lives of millions of innocent people, including Americans, while *'s "elite base" and cronies reap $millions/$billions off the "created realities" of "war" and democracy-subversion (and treason?).

Such is one reality of this "incompetent" "administration".

Medicare Fraud, HCI $1.6 billion, Tenet HC $1.4 billion .....
Count the tens of billions is stock value losses. Enron, Tyco, Tenet, World Com ...the list goes on, plus those not caught red-handed.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x877011

Abramoff, DeLay, Cunningham, Ney, Foggo, Safavian, Reed, Falwell, Federici, Griles, Scanlon, Doolittle, Norquist, ...... to mention just a few.
Can anyone actually count and name all the SCANDALS:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x899312

This goes way back:
Bush vs. Gore, the 'Arkansas Project,' the USA firings, and the Swiftboat Admiral
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1029113

Schwartzenegger's "Gov Davis recall campaign" seeming accommodation to Ken Lay -- as reported and accurately predicted by Greg Palast** -- in the first week of office as "Governor" (a term reserved not only for genuine public servants and but apparently also for scambags) in effectively quashing -- by settling for pennies-on-the-dollar -- Lt. Gov. Bustamante's lawsuit to recover $9B ill-gotten gains by "friends of Lay" from Californians during the gamed "energy crisis" period. From FBI-seized Enron-email documents, ex-"Mr Universe" had been in a meeting with Lay re "California's Energy Crisis" over a year prior to his "campaign", and shortly after Bustamante initiated legal proceedings at the state level upon rebuff of Gray Davis' attempt to recover $9B by Lay/Bush appointeed-FERC at the federal level. Tops, also, on neophyte-politool-Ahnuld's priorities: Recertifying Diebold electronic voting machines that Dem SoS Kevin Shelley had banned. Ahnuld's "public service" ultimate goals: Scamming Californians out of billions... and democracy.

(California had to borrow $11B against its $91Billion General Fund to pay for "public servant" Schwartzenbum/Filth.)

Republican Fraudster and Moron-of-the-Month-every-Month. He sickens me.

( Let's see: Is it "charity" when donations by businessmen are skims off stolen public monies? )

California's deregulation plan was set in place by Repub Pete Wilson, and first evidence of the gamed-system possibly being "tested" was a brief price "spike" during the summer before Davis took office.


**Arnold Unplugged - It’s Hasta La Vista to $9 Billion if the Governator is Selected
Friday, October 3, 2003

Others: Enron & Ken Lay Archives
This Just In! Arnold Responds To Palast Charges In “Arnold Unplugged - It’s Hasta la Vista to $9 Billion if the Governator is Selected”
Commondreams.org
Monday, October 6, 2003

Told’ya So - Yurica Report
Wednesday, October 15, 2003

Siege Heil: The Bush-Rove-Schwarzenegger Nazi Nexus and the Destabilization of California — Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman, October 6, 2003 by The Free Press


Diebold Manipulation in CA? —Was the California Recall Election Rigged?

http://tinyurl.com/qkk23

like it happens daily. :eyes:

...seeing as how this administration seems to be expert at ignoring the law.

I suspect this may have something to do with Cheney backing off from the self-proclaimed "non-Executive branch" status...

:wtf:

they don't if the past teaches us anything. What did Condi do when she got her notice? She went shoe shopping. :eyes:

:hi:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070627/ap_on_go_pr_wh/eavesdropping_subpoenas

Cheney's office, White House subpoenaed
Senate committee probing legality of Bush's eavesdropping program
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19461815/

:hi:

They'll just put the subpoenas in the circular file with the rest of 'em.

They ignore all the dem committees and subpoena's because nothing happens to them. Has Condi ever responded to her subpoena??? How about all those Rove emails??? The dems are harmless and everyone knows it.

the jig is really up. Maybe Leahy has solid enforceable evidence that even the Supreme Court will not be able to ignore. Perhaps, someone, or many people are turning in evidence or singing, like Libby, even.

continually reminds me a Watergate...

Thanks for posting this ... you're the best!

shredder.

I mean, wasn't Condi subpoenaed?

:shrug:


:argh: The rule of law matters not to tyrants and thugs.

Subpoenas did! Can't pull that Executive Privilege crap if you play on some other team. Looks like executive privilege is all that will keep his ass outta jail for destroying evidence.

Can never count on the fuckwad when you need him to produce.

Senate subpoenas Cheney's office, forcing him to claim executive privelege

But of course, Cheney just said he and his office are not part of the executive branch. But he'll have to change his tune immediately in order to squash the subpoena by claiming executive privelege. And that is why the subpoena was issued right now. Two points for the Dems.

http://www.americablog.com/2007/06/senate-subpoenas-cheneys-office-forcing.html

Otherwise I'll side with previous posters who noted that subpoenas have been routinely ignored by this administration.

:kick:

on contempt of the congress.

I want them impeached....and start with Gonzo....then move up the food chain.

and other cabinet officers under investigation, like Rice.

Sgt. At Arms and company to cuff him/haul him in for Contempt of Congress without going through DOJ...please God...make this happen NOW!

extra good luck.

http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.shtml

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Folks, please let them hear from you.





Part of what I told mine:

I beseech you to uphold the law and hold Dick Cheney accountable for his actions. Cheney is a public servant who is accountable to the American people, and we should accept nothing less than full disclosure and transparency.

IF Cheney cannot be force to disclose the appropriate documents, then he SHOULD BE IMPEACHED!

Go Henry!

Senate Judiciary Committee Issues Subpoenas
For Legal Basis Of Bush Administration’s
Domestic Surveillance Program
http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200706/062707a.html


WASHINGTON (Wednesday, June 27) – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), in consultation with Ranking Member Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), issued subpoenas Wednesday for documents relating to the authorization and legal justification for the Administration's warrantless wiretapping program.

Chairman Leahy issued subpoenas to the Department of Justice, the Office of the White House, the Office of the Vice President and the National Security Council for documents relating to the Committee’s inquiry into the warrantless electronic surveillance program. The subpoenas seek documents related to authorization and reauthorization of the program or programs; the legal analysis or opinions about the surveillance; orders, decisions, or opinions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) concerning the surveillance; agreements between the Executive Branch and telecommunications or other companies regarding liability for assisting with or participating in the surveillance; and documents concerning the shutting down of an investigation of the Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) relating to the surveillance.

“Over the past 18 months, this Committee has made no fewer than nine formal requests to the Department of Justice and to the White House, seeking information and documents about the authorization of and legal justification for this program,” Chairman Leahy wrote in letters accompanying the subpoenas to Bush Administration officials. “All requests have been rebuffed. Our attempts to obtain information through testimony of Administration witnesses have been met with a consistent pattern of evasion and misdirection.”

“There is no legitimate argument for withholding the requested materials from this Committee,” Leahy wrote. “The Administration cannot thwart the Congress’s conduct of its constitutional duties with sweeping assertions of secrecy and privilege. The Committee seeks no intimate operational facts and we are willing to accommodate legitimate redactions of the documents we seek to eliminate reference to these details.”

Last week the Committee, in a bipartisan vote of 13-3, authorized Chairman Leahy to issue subpoenas for documents and information related to the domestic surveillance program. The Committee has requested the legal justification for the program several times since it was first revealed in December 2005. The deadline for providing the Committee the information is July 18.

# # # # #

Subpoena packet for documents from the White House, sent via Fred Fielding, Esq.
http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200706/6-27-07%20WH%20Subpoena%20Packet.pdf

Subpoena packet for documents from the Office of the Vice President, sent via Shannen Coffin, Esq.
http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200706/6-27-07%20VP%20Subpoena%20Packet.pdf

Subpoena packet for documents from the Department of Justice, sent via A.G. Alberto Gonzales
http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200706/6-27-07%20DOJ%20Subpoena%20Packet.pdf

Subpoena packet for documents from the National Security Council, sent via Richard Klingler, Esq.
http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200706/6-27-07%20NSC%20Subpoena%20Packet.pdf

,...has arrived. For better or worse, at LEAST we will all know exactly where this country stands: on the edge of Democracy or off the cliff to totalitarianism. I think we deserve to know.

I am regaining my sense of hope.

That wave is going to throw a lot of fish out of the pond.

Those saying "There are no fish in the pond" realize they are the fish.
They just don't want anyone to go fishing.

I LLLLUUUVVV to fish!!! :hi:

I'm really hungry, too!!!

kickety kick

Contempt charges will need to be filed. If Congress files those, the matter will go to the Courts and the time will run out the clock. Congress could send Marshals to arrest the persons that refuse to comply but that action is highly doubtful.

K&R

Please, please, please let this work!!

If the subpoena's don't work, and we don't impeach these bastards, what happens to all the "secret information" that dickie bird has in his "man size safes" when he leaves office in '09 ?????? Are they property of the USA and the incoming administration??? Or do all his secrets leave with him????? Makes one wonder if they have even thought that far ahead??? I don't think dick and georgie would want them in their presidential libraries. Shouldn't they by law go into the archives?? DC

in the Comfy Chair!



Oh, yeah- :sarcasm: (in case you didn't figure it out...)

If there is genuine a 'showdown,' I think you'll see the employment of some of these mysterious laws and signing orders, etc. that have been signed, issued, rubber stamped and passed in the past three years . . . hello Halliburton 'immigration emergency' camps

but fear mongering is a REPUKE ploy. I am not afraid of the dark side. Truth is LIGHT !!!

But unless SOMEONE is willing to actually enforce this, then it will be like everything else and every other "This Is It" moment we have seen in the past seven years.

Absolultely nothing will happen.

A big show will be made, lots of tough talk, stern words, and if we are lucky, a puffy chest or two.

Then nothing.

And the farce that has become our country will continue unabated.

The caveat as always is that I hope I am wrong, but with each passing day I am convinced our country is beyond the point of no return.

Bush and Cabal are never going to be held accountable for a single thing they have done.

And the war will likely continue even after '08.

Cause all he's going to do is wipe his ass with this.

:grr: