Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING HARD: Congressional Democrats have conducted a joint caucus

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:50 PM
Original message
BREAKING HARD: Congressional Democrats have conducted a joint caucus
of the House and Senate and the leadership has announced the pending release of a strong statement condemning the non-responsiveness of the White House in producing documents related to the decision to conduct domestic surveillance.

The roughly 200 word statement will be concise, to the point, and relatively hard-hitting in that it indirectly implies a strong disapproval of the actions that the Executive branch has undertaken to shield itself from congressional oversight.

Looking for a link....

***********DEVELOPNG**************
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. A strong statement! ok then. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
78. Yeah, I'm with ya. Let's keep that powder really good and dry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #78
95. Thank goodness it is a "strong" statement.
How about another non-binding resolution to go with it?

Or a resolution regarding women victimized during the Pelloponesian Wars?

Now we're getting some action!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
117. That'll show 'em
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. They go too far...
It just make us look like a bunch of whining loonies... :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'll be impressed, if the statement includes the promise of severe consequences...
...for the failure to comply with document requests and subpeonas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wow, no way, they are sending a letter?
Way to step up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. But this time they mean business


Dear Mr. President,

So you have stolen 2 elections, lied to get us into a war, have a Vice President who
runs a criminal operation, and you have spied on us.

Please don't do it again.

XOXOXO

The Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
motocicleta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. PS Or you won't be sponge-worthy anymore ...
This time I mean it, you old goat!

JK, CD,
Your backdoor party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. A bit sarcastic?!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. REGISTERED f'in MAIL brah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. Step right up, ladies and gentlemen, to the DLC's dog and pony show
"This is why the DLC is dangerous. For all their claims of supposedly wanting to help Democrats, they employ people like Marshall Wittman who specifically try to undermine the Democratic Party, even if it means he has to publicly defecate out the most rank and easily-debunkable lies. They reguarly give credence to the right wing's agenda and its worst, most unsupportable lies. They are the real force that tries to make sure this country is a one party state and that Democrats never really challenge the Republicans in a serious way."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/why-the-dlc-is-so-dangero_b_13640.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. enough of the strong statements..get the table out and get their asses on
that table!!...impeach...enough of the rethoric!!

stand up to the fuckers for once and for all!!

it is what the people want damn it!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
82. Even a cop has to give a warning before pulling the trigger. I still
hold out hope that congress will act. Not holding my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrantDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. A strong statement???
About some strong actions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. If they do it again, Congress won't let them sit at the same table for lunch any more.
I really hope that's a stronger response than it sounds like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Pretty sad how true it all is. Thats about all we get are strong statements
against this criminal administration....they should be ashamed of how true such headlining supposed fake news breaking is in fact our reality these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Any mention of impeachment?
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. "We'll frog-march the suckers," one aide commented, "right into time out."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Oh now my stomach hurts!
Oh god that was funny. Spoken like a true daddy with a little one at home. Good one ulysses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. "When they want to be nice, they can come out and have a hug," he noted.
"But any more of this drawing on the Constitution with crayons and they'll go right back, young man!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Why I oughta...........
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
50. Muse rider!
:hug: I love that "Why I oughta..........." post you make. Makes me laugh every damn time I see it! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Glad to be of service!
The whole thread is pretty amusing. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. I'll have to check it out.
:patriot: adios friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'll see it when I believe it...
Yes, you read that correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. how's that believing working out for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Well, I haven't seen it yet...
...so I must not be believing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. DONT MAKE ME PULL THIS CAR OVER!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
54. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
73. that sums it up perfectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:55 PM
Original message
...a strong statement! Wow!
That'll straight out the neocons.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:55 PM
Original message
Lip service
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Does that trump two weak statements?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'll bet they'll make the little
"shame-shame" motion with their fingers right at the white house too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
79. stamp their little feet, maybe?? tell the administration they won't
be their BEST FRIENDS any more??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. ...
...

snicker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well, thank god it's going to be "relatively hard hitting".
Compared to what? What they've been going after the Administration with so far?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Oh ye of little faith....
(can't remember where I heard that)but, it's process people. It's slow it grinds it makes you feel like kicking something, but, I watched this back in the seventies w/ the watergate affair. It was infuriatingly slow, but it got there...

Patience grasshoppers. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. that's an interesting point
I was 13 when the hearings were going on. Every night, it was sam Erwin or some other ancient face in my memory. But here's the thing about Watergate, and it holds true for other Republican scandals like Iran/Contra, like BCCI, etc, the perps never end up paying a price. See Ollie North, see John Poindexter, see Eliot Abrams, see so many others. What makes this different, besides the sheer audacity of the crimes, is that the Internet has allowed us all to open the door to knowledge about the goings on. Our expectations are much different because we know percisely how badly we've been screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. Almost all the "perps" went to jail
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 07:26 PM by jaysunb
including the AG John Mitchell...Colson,Haldeman, Ehrlichman,Dean and several more that I can't recall off hand.

Most people never thought that would happen, but it did.

But your point is well taken with regards to the new dynamics. An old blues line goes like this : fellas, if you catch your woman doing wrong, don't whip her, it'll only make her smarter, and she won't let you catch her next time.

They've gotten much wiser and have a pretty well stacked deck this time around i.e. the courts the media, and a large swatch of the public.

It can happen for us this time too, but it'll be much harder and slower this time around.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. Yes, it was slow!
Remember doing homework in the student union building because there was a TV and the networks actually boardcasted the hearings! Image doing what they were supposed to do, inform the public! OMG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
59. No, no, no.
Sorry. We had a REAL press back then and REAL Democrats and REAL Republicans. The 4th Estate has sold out long ago and virtually every member of Congress and the Senate are bought and paid for by the same corporations that determine who our nominees will be, that put them in office and write the legislation.

Sorry, my friend. Not the same AT ALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #59
109. Ding! Ding! Ding! We've got a winner!!! You nailed it, Taz!
This is a whole new ballgame.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
84. Yes, but Nixon didn't have the MSNBC Murder Of The Week running interference for him
To say nothing of Paris, Brangelina, Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears, Chris Matthews and his extra-special friend Ann Coulter for a WHOLE FUCKING HOUR, Nancy Grace and the Flaring Nostrils of Justice and all the rest of the rising tide of puke and swill washing away what news it can't cover up.

Different time, different country, different fucking world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
100. Seems to me that it got us....to where we are now.
I'm feeling a bit discouraged about Watergate these days. Seems like it just pushed Nixon out to make room for Cheney and Rummy and their buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. From Mid-May..."Congress Needs Our Help: How to stall on Impeachment…"
It’s mid 2007 and there’s a good 18 months of inaction needed until Impeachment is mute. But Bush & Co. keeps revealing more and more impeachable crimes. So, how does Congress stall for 18 months?

Here’s a few suggestions:

1.) Send a strongly worded letter asking Bush to stop committing crimes…at least for a few days.

2.) Begin drafting a non-binding resolution that suggests a date certain when all crimes by the administration should stop.

3.) Hold a hearing and take testimony from experts on how to hold a hearing on the possibilities of an impeachment hearing.

4.) Appoint a Bipartisan Blue Ribbon Commission to look into what would comprise an impeachable offence and commit to suggesting the President follow the commission’s findings.

This is just a start. I’m sure DUers have many more suggestions


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=909046
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. will it include the "I" word?
I didn't think so. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
87. As in "I am very disappointed in you, Mr Cheney. VERY disappointed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #87
88. sadly
you are most likely correct. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. Right, maybe they can huff and puff and blow them out of office
No wonder they're ignoring the subpoenas. They know nobody's going to push the issue.

Sure the USSC is stacked and will back them up. However, the whole process of challenging the runaway power of the executive will wake a few more people up and when Congress changes hands in a decisive way, they will have grounds to impeach the bought and paid for (in)justices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
31. AND.... Harry Reid will be the 'front man' delivering this "strong statement"! /chuckle eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. you don't want to send your rock star out there at this point. Byrd should do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. Wielding his fearsome
wet noodle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
81. I thought Byrd WAS the rock star -- ??
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
75. FUCK REID and his "bar too high" cowardice.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
33. Thanks For The Info. Keep Us Posted! Can't Wait To Read What It Says.
Go get em Dems!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
76. Yes! Hooray for empty threats!
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
37. oooohhh! strongly worded! what's next? stern warnings?
Let's see some indictments. Or Grand Jury testimony. I'm sick and tired of the posturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
55. And "symbolic gestures"
Fucking throw them out on the lawn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
71. Let's not be hasty here
There are some who advocate 'stern warnings'.

The true keepers of the "dry powder" pay them no heed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
39. The House needs to censure the president it is that simple.
The Senate should follow suit even if it it fails at cloture.

80% of the american population would applaud the move.

The House needs to censure the president it is that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Now THIS would be a good start, if the Dems want to show they mean business. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #39
77. At a minimum. Other countries arrest high criminals; they rule us with impunity here.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
41. Hope its a nonbinding strong statement.
(like the rest of them)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
44. breaking wind, ...IMPEACH! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. Woo Wooo Woooo Wooooot!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
45. Ouch ...
I'll bet that'll get Cheneyac's attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
46. OH NO! not the STRONG STATEMENT!!! the white house must be quaking in it's lil' boots...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #46
62. I agree this is getting comical but I guess they have to go
through the procedures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #46
72. Next, THE COMFY CHAIR!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #72
86. Nobody expects the Democratic Inquisition!
Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency.... Our *three* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.... Our *four*...no... *Amongst* our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as fear, surprise.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
47. Where's the beef?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zandor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
48. Making things up???
Just to criticize Democrats?

Why spark a hate fest against Democrats in congress with a made up story? They've done enough you can criticize then for legitimately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
49. "It's got to be hard to be good."
By somebody. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
56. Be still my heart.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
57. It will be delivered with a keg of Dry Powder.
Since there is no longer room to store the latest shipment in the Congressional basement.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. you win! rofl
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
60. Consequences???
Strong statements are nice. Even very strong statements.

What's really needed is action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
61. We are witnessing a Constitutional Crisis before our eyes
be ready people to realize this is a Dictatorship

after the realization
Congress will need to shut down the government
we maybe heading there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #61
83. the Constitutional Crisis is that Congress won't do ANYthing
to stop these maniacs and destroyers of this nation and, if they get the chance, civilization itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #83
105. Your absolutely right and thats whats very obvious
Congress is doing nothing but investigations which go no where stealing laws being broken right and left and its obvious Congress is part of this stealing and broken government... We are watching this pathetic show of force...

meanwhile Bush the dictator goes on breaking law after law

I really see the state governments rebelling and Civil War will be next

with people migrating to safer places

This country is in dire straights and it is Bush Cheney and Congress and Supremem Court responsible

all these steps are going to the inevitable history lesson

The Power is with the People

Bush Cheney and the Powers to Be have FAILED and will keep FAILING

we get closer to the inevitable downfall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
63. Oh no, not a strong statement!
That is way too much partisanship. The next thing you know, they may slap their hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
64. I just find this depressing.
I'm sorry; I'd like to feel differently. If only someone could convince me that this means something, I'd be open to it. But to tell the truth, it's almost beyond depressing and heading into the embarrassing category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. that's the point of posts like these
to drive you to cynicism and apathy

with no link, no article, no story at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. I am surprised that there is still no link
I didn't read every response, and just assumed that there was one in there somewhere. Well, now I'm really confused.:shrug: The OP was hours ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. There is no link and there won't be.
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 10:37 PM by Emit
It's satire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. D'oh!
Got it now.:blush: Well, all I can say in my defense is that it's very believable satire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #66
91. I guess it's kind of sad that it isn't possible to write something bizarre
enough for readers to understand the satire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. I am waiting for some strong action.
I won't hold my breath on that because I don't want to turn blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
69. I smell a "strongly worded letter" brewing
Ah, those Democrats, they're so bold, ruthless and cunning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
74. You've glossed over the details of this.
The House and Senate have announced that a few members of their caucus have expressed interest in a non-binding resolution outlining a possible 18 month timeline for correspondence with the White House with an option to issue a "strong statement" after 15 months if a bipartisan committee believes the executive branch has failed to meet certain benchmarks. Of course these benchmarks may be waived by the Vice President if he feels they interfere with the conduct of his duties.

This is real progress, folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #74
99. 18 months. Wow. They're really rushing things, aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
80. No! Not . . . not . . . the STRONG STATEMENT!!
AIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
85. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
89. LOL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
90. The White House was non-responsive; Russert waiting for phone-call n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. Best "journalist" line ever: "I wish someone would have called me"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattomjoe Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
93. "Strong statement"? What's next?
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 12:13 PM by mattomjoe
Stern, disapproving looks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
94. why don't they just send in a 'strong' swat team and be done with it
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
96. I issued a "strong statement" to my daughter about eating candy before dinner.
I hope Congress gets better results than I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #96
101. That's OK as long as impeaching your daughter is off the tabe nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
97. HARD!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
98. LOL!
:D


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #98
102. OMG - I LOVE this!!!!
Ya gonna put it on CafePress or something? Way to go!!!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #102
104. It's free! ... jus' download print and stick.
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 03:34 PM by Swamp Rat
:D

edit: www.swamp-rat.com


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
103. Hey, not just a strong statement, but a strong statement that "**indirectly** implies a strong
disapproval" -- INDIRECTLY IMPLIES - What the fuckity fuck????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
106. "...indirectly implies a strong disapproval ..." Wow! Next thing you know...
...they'll draw up Articles of Impeachment to be introduced on the floor of the House in circa 2050!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
107. Oooooooh . . . a "strong statement." Booga, booga, booga.
I'm shaking in my sandals.:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
108. Statement, schmatement.
I want some action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
110. Yea, it says "We fart in your general direction!" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
111. Is the word "IMPEACHMENT" In it anywhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
112. OH FUCKING BULLSHIT
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 05:16 PM by WilliamPitt
In his response to Fielding’s letter, Conyers said the president showed “an appalling disregard for the right of the people to know what is going on in their government.”

“The executive privilege assertion is unprecedented in its breadth and scope, and even includes documents that the administration previously offered to provide as part of their ‘take it or leave it’ proposal,” said Conyers, in a prepared statement. “This response indicates the reckless disrespect this administration has for the rule of law.”

“The charges alleged in this investigation are serious – including obstruction of justice and misleading Congress – and the White House should be as committed to this investigation as the Congress. At this point, I see only one choice in moving forward, and that is to enforce the rule of law set forth in these subpoenas.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070628/NEWS07/70628019/0/NEWS02

A lot of you people are really fucking quick to do the lemming thing whenever something to be incoherently incensed at is dangled before you...without a link, or any sort of attribution.

Jesus..."relatively hard-hitting in that it indirectly implies a strong disapproval of the actions..."?

Does that sound like anything other than satire?

P.S. Comprehensive searching finds no statement like this anywhere.

Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
113. Is that "strongly worded" or "STRONGLY worded"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
114. DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT - CALL THE JUSTICE DEP....
OOPS, NEVERMIND!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
115. Ok Drudge, Jr. nice work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
distantearlywarning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
116. Ooooh! A strong statement!
I bet Cheney's shaking in his boots right now!

Ok, probably not.

I know that people who say things like this are always accused of being trolls by people who don't want to hear it, but this is how I feel: The Democrats are being a bunch of pansy-asses right now, and I'm very disappointed in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC