Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IMPEACH CHENEY-The VP Has Run Utterly Amuck & Must Be Stopped (Slate Magazine)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:29 PM
Original message
IMPEACH CHENEY-The VP Has Run Utterly Amuck & Must Be Stopped (Slate Magazine)
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 08:33 PM by kpete
Impeach Cheney
The vice president has run utterly amuck and must be stopped.

By Bruce Fein
Posted Wednesday, June 27, 2007, at 5:06 PM ET

Under Dick Cheney, the office of the vice president has been transformed from a tiny acorn into an unprecedented giant oak. In grasping and exercising presidential powers, Cheney has dulled political accountability and concocted theories for evading the law and Constitution that would have embarrassed King George III. The most recent invention we know of is the vice president's insistence that an executive order governing the handling of classified information in the executive branch does not reach his office because he also serves as president of the Senate. In other words, the vice president is a unique legislative-executive creature standing above and beyond the Constitution. The House judiciary committee should commence an impeachment inquiry. As Alexander Hamilton advised in the Federalist Papers, an impeachable offense is a political crime against the nation. Cheney's multiple crimes against the Constitution clearly qualify.

.........

The Constitution does not expressly forbid the president from abandoning his chief powers to the vice president. But President Bush's tacit delegation to Cheney and Cheney's eager acceptance tortures the Constitution's provision for an acting president. The presidency and vice presidency are discrete constitutional offices. The 12th Amendment provides for their separate elections. The sole constitutionally enumerated function of the vice president is to serve as president of the Senate without a vote except to break ties.

In contrast, Article II enumerates the powers and responsibilities of the president, including the obligation to take care that the laws be faithfully executed. A special presidential oath is prescribed. Section 3 of the 25th Amendment provides a method for the president to yield his office to the vice president, when "he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office." There is no other constitutional provision for transferring presidential powers to the vice president.

Yet without making a written transmittal to Congress, President Bush has ceded vast domains of his powers to Vice President Cheney by mutual understanding that circumvents the 25th Amendment. This constitutional provision assures that the public and Congress know who is exercising the powers of the presidency and who should be held responsible for successes or failures. The Bush-Cheney dispensation blurs political accountability by continually hiding the real decision-maker under presidential skirts. The Washington Post has thoroughly documented the vice president's dominance in a four-part series running this week. It is quite a read.

Let's review the record of his abuses and excesses:
http://www.slate.com/id/2169292
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. How much are we supposed to take without doing anything?
For fuck's sake, impeach the bastard already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow, and Bruce Fein worked for Reagan's Justice Department!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you, Captain Obvious.
Yes, I have a bad attitude. K&R :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. LOL
me to!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Maybe we should start a weekly Bad Attitude thread.
lol

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hmmm, Mr. Fein has pointed out another interesting possibility
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 08:51 PM by Spazito
with cheney's claim re Executive Branch:

Mr. Cheney is defending himself from a pending suit brought by Wilson and Plame on the grounds that he is entitled to the absolute immunity of the president established in 1982 by Nixon v. Fitzgerald. (Although this defense contradicts Cheney's claim that he is not part of the executive branch.)


Very good point, I am sure Ambassador and Mrs. Wilson are making note of this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. thanks for pointing that out Spazito
this is great coming from a repub!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You're welcome! Bruce Fein is one of those "rarities", at least
in the current context, a Republican who is putting his country before his politics. I have watched him testify before Congress and he has always struck me as an ethical man and one who IS an expert on the Constitution. Here is a transcript of his testimony before Congress on bush's signing statements:

http://judiciary.senate.gov/testimony.cfm?id=1969&wit_id=5482
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why is amnesty for illegal aliens more important than this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. YE-AH..and who's
gonna do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R!
Thanks for posting! :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. Here's Mr. Fein's legislative agenda to restore the rule of law and reverse the Bush-Cheney abuses:
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 02:31 PM by charles t


The American Freedom Agenda


The American Freedom Agenda’s (AFA) mission is twofold: the enactment of a cluster of statutes that would restore the Constitution’s checks and balances as enshrined by the Founding Fathers; and, making the subject a staple of political campaigns and of foremost concern to Members of Congress and to voters and educators. Especially since 9/11, the executive branch has chronically usurped legislative or judicial power, and has repeatedly claimed that the President is the law. The constitutional grievances against the White House are chilling, reminiscent of the kingly abuses that provoked the Declaration of Independence.

The 10-point American Freedom Agenda would work to restore the roles of Congress and the federal judiciary to prevent such abuses of power and protect against injustices that are the signature of civilized nations. In particular, the American Freedom Agenda would:

(1.) Prohibit military commissions whose verdicts are suspect except in places of active hostilities where a battlefield tribunal is necessary to obtain fresh testimony or to prevent anarchy;

(2.) Prohibit the use of secret evidence or evidence obtained by torture or coercion in military or civilian tribunals;

(3.) Prohibit the detention of American citizens as unlawful enemy combatants without proof of criminal activity on the President’s say-so;

(4.) Restore habeas corpus for alleged alien enemy combatants, i.e., non-citizens who have allegedly participated in active hostilities against the United States, to protect the innocent;

(5.) Prohibit the National Security Agency from intercepting phone conversations or emails or breaking and entering homes on the President’s say-so in violation of federal law;

(6.) Empower the House of Representatives and the Senate collectively to challenge in the Supreme Court the constitutionality of signing statements that declare the intent of the President to disregard duly enacted provisions of bills he has signed into law because he maintains they are unconstitutional;

(7.) Prohibit the executive from invoking the state secrets privilege to deny justice to victims of constitutional violations perpetrated by government officers or agents; and, establish legislative-executive committees in the House and Senate to adjudicate the withholding of information from Congress based on executive privilege that obstructs oversight and government in the sunshine;

(8.) Prohibit the President from kidnapping, detaining, and torturing persons abroad in collaboration with foreign governments;

(9.) Amend the Espionage Act to permit journalists to report on classified national security matters without fear of prosecution; and;

(10.) Prohibit the listing of individuals or organizations with a presence in the United States as global terrorists or global terrorist organizations based on secret evidence.


http://www.americanfreedomagenda.org/






Mr. Fein appears to be the prime mover in this group of dis-affected conservatives.


. . . . .




Here was Mr. Fein last Saturday, along with Col. Lawrence Wilkerson (Colin Powell's former chief-of-staff) speaking at the "Should Impeachment Be on the Table?" town hall forum at George Mason University:
http://www.peaceandaccountability.com/greg/June23GMU.html



. . . . .



And here was Mr. Fein, a former Reagan Department of Justice appointee, campaigning for a Democratic takeover of Congress last October:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0610.fein.html


. . . . .



Mr. Fein appears to be one of those rare birds who puts principles over power. It's unfortunate our nation, and our party, doesn't have a few more like him.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Would Cheney preside over his own impeachment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Perhaps.......
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 06:19 PM by charles t



Article II, Section 4 says the following:




Article II, Section 4

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h231.html




Article I lays out the 2 step process, with impeachment in the House, and trial in the Senate. The Vice President is designated the president of the Senate in Article 1, Section 3.

Clause 6 makes an exception, specifying the Chief Justice to preside during trials of the President if the United States. But a specific exception, designating an alternate to preside over the Senate during a trial of the Vice President of the United States, is not specified.




Article I, Section 2

Clause 5: The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Article I, Section 3

Clause 6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Clause 7: Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party, (defendant), convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h231.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. This Cheney crap is getting sooo old, why don't the Dem's put this sucker in his place already -
Would Bush pull a Gonzo act with the Dick and merely state I'm satisfied with "go fu*k yourself and happy with his contributions to this administration. WTF are the Dem's capable of doing? anything?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. yet another reason to impeach him
Video lecture by Prof. Peter Dale Scott
on his new book and links to why Cheney should be impeached.

Most interestly his focus is on the links between Cheney,
oil policy and 911 via the stand down directive.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2978244787099383010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. Prediction: Cheney will resign before he forks over documents - he can't it
opens up a can of worms on everything he's intentionally kept hidden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC