Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi: ‘Hate Radio’ Hijacked Political Discourse With ‘Xenophobic, Anti-Immigrant’ Rhetoric

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:22 PM
Original message
Pelosi: ‘Hate Radio’ Hijacked Political Discourse With ‘Xenophobic, Anti-Immigrant’ Rhetoric
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 04:25 PM by babylonsister
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/28/pelosi-talk-radio/

Pelosi: ‘Hate Radio’ Hijacked Political Discourse With ‘Xenophobic, Anti-Immigrant’ Rhetoric

Last night, PBS’s Charlie Rose interviewed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). During their discussion, Rose asked Pelosi about her opinion of the immigration bill in the Senate (which was defeated today).

Pelosi praised several provisions of the bill, but strongly criticized the bill’s vehement opponents on the radical right — especially on talk radio. Pelosi objected to their tactics saying that “talk radio, or in some cases hate radio…just go on and on and on in a xenophobic, anti-immigrant” manner. Pelosi noted that when it comes to bashing undocumented immigrants, “all of a sudden, all these people of faith are just very unforgiving.”

Watch it/read transcript at link~

Pelosi’s characterization of the “xenophobic” and “anti-immigrant” dialogue on talk radio is well-documented. In recent weeks, Media Matters has highlighted several particularly egregious examples:

– Bill O’Reilly asserted that supporters of the immigration bill “hate America” and “want to flood the country with foreign nationals, unlimited, unlimited, to change the complexion” of our society. {Link}

– Michael Savage called a Hispanic advocacy group, National Council of La Raza, “the Ku Klux Klan of the Hispanic people” and said that La Raza “is the most stone racist group I’ve ever seen in this country!” {Link}

– Neal Boortz argued in favor of the controversial border fence, stating, “I don’t care if Mexicans pile up against that fence like tumbleweeds in the Santa Ana winds in Southern California. … {J}ust run a couple of taco trucks up and down the line.” {Link}

Though conservatives may take up 91 percent of the talk radio airwaves, talk radio is not representative of the American people, who broadly supported the key components of the legislation. More information about the radically conservative bias in daytime talk radio HERE:
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/06/talk_radio.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mediawatch Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. boy this A M thing really has Pelosi's panties in an uproar
Who watches or listens to Bill O'Reilly and Michael Savage?

She makes it sound like one cable station and A M radio is running the country, or ruining the country. Was Air America on A M radio? What about watch NPR or PBS. Geesh
There are other talk shows and news stations.... right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change has come Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Have you checked out the provided link?
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 04:42 PM by sgcase
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/06/talk_radio.html

*snip

The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio

...Among radio formats, the combined news/talk format (which includes news/talk/information and talk/personality) leads all others in terms of the total number of stations per format and trails only country music in terms of national audience share. Through more than 1,700 stations across the nation, the combined news/talk format is estimated to reach more than 50 million listeners each week.

* Our analysis in the spring of 2007 of the 257 news/talk stations owned by the top five commercial station owners reveals that 91 percent of the total weekday talk radio programming is conservative, and 9 percent is progressive.

* Each weekday, 2,570 hours and 15 minutes of conservative talk are broadcast on these stations compared to 254 hours of progressive talk—10 times as much conservative talk as progressive talk.

* A separate analysis of all of the news/talk stations in the top 10 radio markets reveals that 76 percent of the programming in these markets is conservative and 24 percent is progressive, although programming is more balanced in markets such as New York and Chicago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChazII Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Nova M/Air America is alive and well in Phoenix
so perhaps Phoenix could share their plan with other stations. What ever they are doing it is working so their plan could work in other markets as well. There is also strong local business support for 1480. I am sure that our DUer would be glad to send in contributions like the people in Phoenix did for KPHX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Er, *whose* "panties are in an uproar"???
Seems to me that the whole point was that it's the rabid hateful right that has their panties in an uproar.

Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, for once the hate pundits on radio and TV got it right but
for the wrong reasons.

Immigrants wont ruin the Untied States but corporations exploiting them will.

It's sad that people like O'Liely and Ann the Man can be heard over rational voices like Tom Hartmann and Greg Palast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Absolutely...if more people listened to Thom
we'd have all this nonsense sorted out in no time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. STFU, Nancy.
It was a bad bill tailor made for big business. I'm one solid left wing Democrat that was glad to see that mound of shit go down in flames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Madame Squeaker, stop the shrill squeaking already.
Impeachment and ending the never-ending deaths in Iraq should be your focus. Not all of America listens to talk/hate radio. I don't. I know the immigration bill was crap. So did the majority of voters. You will pay dearly for being cozy with Bush. Lie down with Satan and you'll get burned!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. "xenophoboc, anti-immigrant"..Perish the thought. Here, in ever tolerant 'Murka??
With our long glorious history of welcoming the poor and helpless??

See Anne Frank & family for another illustration of our open arms policies to those in need. But, they would probably have "stolen jobs".

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/02/15/wfrank15.xml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Now that is true and Orlando AM talk radio is the pits I listen to the
....Spanish music stations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think Randi Rhodes devoted maybe 2 minutes to the whole issue
I dont remember hearing much about it on Hartmann either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChazII Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. I didn't hear
much either. I thought I must have missed the section where anyone discussed this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Illegal immigration" is a manufactured problem designed to distract from more serious issues,
and to rile up the racist asshole republicans.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nancy's right. As someone who lives in an area (Nebraska) where the
only talk radio is reich-wing, I can attest to the fact that they're all about whipping up hatred and anger. That's all they do--provoke strong negative us-vs.-them emotion. It's why they are so successful, and make the advertising dollars, and have so much influence. Of course, they all SAY "We're not racist--we LOVE Latinos!" but then, like Subliminal Man, they'll cut to a commercial break with "Aye Yi Yi Yi" mariachi music, to remind you who your enemies are. They serve no useful purpose except to inflame the faithful and the gullible, and drive them away from Democrats. They are cartoon characters, who strive to make cartoons out of Dems and progressives. Having had a steady diet of their utter bullshit, their quotes out of context, and their demonization and ridicule of anybody who does not fit the narrow Republican Conservative mold, I can say that Nancy's spot-on. The immigration debate, no matter which side you come down on, is but one example of their unfortunate reach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. Broadly supported? Really?
I don't know a single person who was for this travesty. Everyone hated it and it got the consideration it deserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChazII Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. Then have the locals
start their own progressive station. It can be done and it was done in Phoenix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I rarely agree with Dickhead Morris but his theory rings true.
He posits that the Dems pushed for this Bill to garner more Mexicans. within the US. votes, knowing all the while that the Bill would not pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. Nancy, you are the speaker of the fucking House. When you speak, America listens
and gives you air time galore on every prime time station out there, including the reichwing.

So stop with the "make nice" rhetoric and begin acting like a leader. Get tough and there will begin to be a dialogue instead of just mealy-mouthed-shit-full-of-pablum.

You have caved and attempted to "work with" criminal thugs. Stand tough and take them on - you have been gifted with a prominent podium, use the damn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. How did Madam speaker vote on passing funding for enforcement
of the fairness doctrine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC