No Justice at Lt. Watada Pre-Trial Reply; Anti-War Organizers Again Subpoenaed by Army

http://www.couragetoresist.org/x/content/view/326/39

No justice at Lt. Watada's pre-trial replay

Courage to Resist. July 9, 2007

On Friday, a pretrial hearing was held at Fort Lewis in the U.S. Army's second attempt to court-martial Lt. Ehren Watada for refusing to deploy to Iraq in June 2006. Lt. Watada continues to argue that the Iraq war is illegal under U.S. and international law. During the first court martial in February, after over a thousand anti-war protesters gathered at the gates of Fort Lewis, military judge Lt. Col. John Head orchestrated a mistrial in order save the prosecutions weak showing prior to defense arguments. Now, this same judge plans on presiding over a new trial. Last week Judge Head ruled in support of himself, twice. First, Head claimed that he could be impartial claiming beyond credibility that he does not have an "intractable attitude or preconceived notions". Second, he ruled that a new trial again wouldn't violate Lt. Watada’s constitutional right not to be prosecuted twice for the same crime, known as double jeopardy.

The U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals has issued a partial stay in the court martial that remains in effect. While pretrial proceedings have been allowed to go forward, no court-martial can take place until the partial stay is lifted. If the current partial stay is lifted in time for the scheduled July 23 court martial, it is likely that the Federal Court of Appeals would step in to review the issue of double jeopardy.

During the pre-trial hearing, it came to light that Judge Head's supervisor sent the judge an e-mail in February indicating she believed the mistrial did not create double-jeopardy issues and that a second court-martial could move forward. Lt. Watada’s new attorneys, Kenneth Kagan and James Lobsenz Kagan said the e-mail suggested there was pressure on Judge Head to rule a certain way.

Honolulu attorney Eric Seitz, who was Lt. Watada's defense lawyer until March, said yesterday he wasn't surprised by the outcome of the pretrial hearing. "I would expect they (the appeals court) would take the issues far more seriously than Judge Head is capable of doing. I would never expect Judge Head to reverse himself but would certainly expect the Appellate Court to do that," Seitz said. "He was not the most competent judge I've met in my life."

Lt. Watada’s father Robert Watada remarked to the Honolulu Star Bulletin newspaper, "My own assessment is that it (the military court proceeding) was very much like a Salem witch trial. We fully expected this." If the court martial is allowed to proceed, Robert Watada noted that it would probably be in October.


http://www.couragetoresist.org/x/content/view/326/39/

Washington State anti-war organizers again subpoenaed by Army

Although few expect the Army to be able to retry Lt. Watada July 23-28 as they plan, the Army has again subpoenaed regional anti-war organizers to take the stand against Lt. Watada. Late last week, Seattle Veterans for Peace organizers Gerri Haynes and Tom Brookhart were re-subpoenaed to “verify remarks Lt. Watada made to the VFP National Convention last August.” Olympia Movement for Justice and Peace activist Phan Nguyen was re-subpoenaed by the prosecution to explain how Lt. Watada’s initial June 7, 2006 press conference in Tacoma, Washington was organized.

Subpoenas delivered to activists last week read: "Enclosed is a copy of the travel order and subpoena for your production as a government witness in the court martial U.S. v. Watada. The trial is scheduled to take place from 23-28 July 2007. As the travel order states, the government will reimburse you for your mileage for all trips made to and from your place of residence to Fort Lewis, plus $40.00 a day attendance fees."

VFP organizer and Vietnam Era veteran Tom Brookhart told Courage to Resist:

It was discouraging to be re-subpoenaed to appear as a witness for the US Army prosecutor in the court martial of Lt. Ehren Watada, a real American hero and true role model for soldiers everywhere. I was hopeful the military, after shooting itself in the foot and limping out of the first trial, would take the diplomatic and ethical opportunity to allow Lt. Watada to honorably resign from the Army. But it appears they are determined to make an example of this man who tried to lead the military in exercising moral and ethical judgment.

In this war we have seen that orders are to be followed no matter how illegal, unethical and immoral. The military is led by a Commander-In-Chief who claims to be above both domestic and international law, who lied this nation into war and who many feel deserves the title 'international terrorist and war criminal'.

MORE

I don't think the media coverage did a good job of pointing that out.

The double jeopardy concept is supposed to prevent double trials. The first trial was canned, so there is still just the one trial.

And what is the big deal about witnesses? They are not likely to do anything but present the truth.

Watada and crew need to close on the target and lock horns. It is the Army that has the most to risk in this, and are absolute idiots for pursuing it. If the Army can not lock down a conviction they stand to lose a lot.

imho, Watada should have been allowed the War Crimes defense -- but the Army Court already declared itself incompetent of making that conclusion. But even that can work in Watada's advantage. If Watada loses this round, the War Crimes matter will be the grounds for an appeal and overturn of the conviction.

Overall, Watada is likely to come out fine.

Welcome to DU!! :toast: