Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

All those phone numbers and only one politician found? What gives?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 11:42 AM
Original message
All those phone numbers and only one politician found? What gives?
I was hoping for a real fun day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. No! I heard he gave himself up before his name was even found on the
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 11:45 AM by babylonsister
list. Will try to find where I saw that.

Edit to add this:

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003639.php

Senator John Fessed Up
By Paul Kiel - July 10, 2007, 11:29 AM

It wasn't immediately apparent from the stories yesterday, but Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) showed great faith in the Fourth Estate yesterday, admitting to being a customer of the D.C. madam as a sort of preemptive measure. The madam, Deborah Jeane Palfrey, released her business' phone records to the press last week and uploaded the records to her website (currently down) yesterday. Apparently Vitter thought it was just a matter of time before some muckraker found him out.

Vitter's statement only admits obliquely that Vitter's number was on one of Palfrey's old lists. The AP's New Orleans' bureau apparently received the statement yesterday, and then spent some time trying to confirm its authenticity. "Vitter's spokesman, Joel Digrado, confirmed the statement Monday evening in an e-mail to The Associated Press," according to an early version of the wire story.

No one seems to know when (or how often) Vitter used the service; all his statement says is that it was "prior to his running for the U.S. Senate" in 2004. He'd been a congressman since 1999, and Palfrey's records date back to 1996. The AP still hadn't seen the records as of last night, since reporters were "unable to connect to Palfrey's website."

The records contain thousands upon thousands of numbers without names. Most of the recent records, dating from 2002 to 2006, were released to ABC News back in March; a team of researchers set to matching the numbers to names. Jeff Schneider, a spokesman for ABC News, said that they had not found Vitter's number in those records. "With the release of a full ten years of records, it seems clear that his number came up in one of the records we did not have access to," he told me.

As for now, the race is on for who can pile up the most vividly hypocritical quote from the family values (or as he put it, "Louisiana values") conservative. In the running: Sen. Vitter maligning the "Hollywood left" for violating the "sanctity of marriage," and Vitter arguing that President Clinton should step down for his extramarital affair (Vitter, by the by, replaced Rep. Bob Livingston (R-LA) after the speaker was forced to step down because of an affair). There are, you can be sure, many more. Glenn Greenwald has a rundown here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Wasn't he "outed" in 2004
for an 11 year relationship with a hooker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They took them off.
I tried to download them and the ones I got last night had already been taken off. The few numbers I got are the madam's herself and that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. It was preemptive by Vitter
Nobody found it... he announced by himself

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003639.php


The problem I'm having in searching the numbers is that most are cell phones and any reverse lookup site requires paying a fee for the info which I can't do. People will search each and every number that has this kind of access and plenty will come out... may just take a while
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Nope....Hustler took him down...
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. there are 10,000 numbers, and list was released Mon. evening.
Vitter outed himself... patience, my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Before the gag order went into place, Palfrey was contacted by lawyers for former clients....
So obviously there are a lot of still to be named 'clients' out there to be exposed.

The question is, Are they powerful government figures or just low level bureaucrats and private individuals.

I would expect that there are a lot more out there which Vitter figured would take some of the heat off him by announcing early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalArkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why would there be any politicians on the list. Everyone knows
that our politicians are the finest more morally correct people on the face of the earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC