Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miers to Invoke Privilege, But Conyers Calls Her Anyway

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:54 PM
Original message
Miers to Invoke Privilege, But Conyers Calls Her Anyway
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003644.php

Miers to Invoke Privilege, But Conyers Calls Her Anyway
By Paul Kiel - July 10, 2007, 3:10 PM

Former White House counsel Harriet Miers will comply with the president's assertion of executive privilege, her lawyer wrote the House Judiciary Committee yesterday. Nevertheless, Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) and subcomittee Chairwoman Linda Sanchez (D-CA) have asked Miers to appear anyway.

The committee subpoenaed Miers last month, ordering her to appear this Thursday. In a letter to Conyers yesterday, Miers' lawyer George Manning wrote that Miers is "subject to conflicting commands, with Congress demanding the production of information that the Counsel to the President has informed her she is prohibited from disclosing." He went on, overstating the president's power to stop Miers from testifying:

Ms. Miers is, of course, respectful of her obligations to respond appropriately to the subpoena issued and served upon her. In these circumstances, however, as I am sure you know, Ms. Miers has no choice other than to comply with direction given her by Counsel to the president in his letters mentioned above. This is particularly so because, as the members of the Committee are aware, the assertion of the privilege in this circumstance is supported by the thorough and reasoned opinion of the Solicitor General of the United States....

Accordingly, and will all due respect, I must inform you that in light of the President's assertion of Executive Privilege, Ms. Miers cannot provide the documents and testimony that the Committee seeks.


As I reported yesterday, Miers does in fact have a choice. She could choose to defy the president's direction, though the move would certainly send the battle to court. You can read Manning's letter here.

Conyers was straightforward in his reply, saying that he was just writing to confirm that Miers would be appearing Thursday:

I understand from your letter that Ms. Miers may decline to produce documents or answer questions based on your interpretation of letters you have received from the White House, and those claims will be considered at the hearing, but it is of course incumbent on Ms. Miers to appear at the hearing pursuant to the subpoena.


Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) has taken the same approach to Karl Rove's former aide Sara Taylor, who's scheduled to appear before his committee tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a great visual.
If called she has to appear to assert privilege. It will be a great visual for the country to see *'s Supreme Court nominee stonewalling and investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Conyers: "I got yer privilege RIGHT HERE!" nt
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. i think something else is afoot
and I like the smell of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. jail until she gets her bony ass up to Capitol Hill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Go, Mr. Conyers!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. "I am the royal decider." - Commander AWOL
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 03:04 PM by SpiralHawk
"My royal decree trumps the Constitution and all the democracy shit you little people are into. So shut up and sit down."

- Commander AWOL, Royal Scion of the Republicon Chickenhawk Anti-American Cabal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Where are all the "Clinton-did-its" today?
Clinton's aides had to testify. Clinton did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fine. Then Drag Her Out In Cuffs For Contempt.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Subpoena the whole bunch
and RICO their asses, everyone of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. so when she DOESN'T show up?
a warrant for her arrest? (can congress do that? i'm not clear on the rules here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC