Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Resurrecting "Fahrenheit 9/11": Michael Moore vindicated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:04 PM
Original message
Resurrecting "Fahrenheit 9/11": Michael Moore vindicated
LAT: Moore Betta
Dan Neil
February 4, 2007

Some scenes are funnier, and sadder, than they were 21/2 years ago: Britney Spears being earnestly interviewed about global politics while she savages some poor piece of gum: "Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision that he makes," says the Brit. Then there's the principal of the Executive Chute Corp. on NBC's "Today" show, gamely struggling to fit a thunder-thighed assistant with the device that—should you find yourself atop a burning skyscraper—you may quickly don and jump to safety, maybe. And I love the shoppers congratulating themselves for braving a terrorist attack by patronizing the strategically vital mall in Saginaw, Mich.

Was it, as Michael Moore asks in his 2004 documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11," all just a dream? Alas, no. The American public was just that . . . what? To convey the sense with which we were so easily frightened into waging war in Iraq, only agricultural metaphors will do: Stampeded, cowed, buffaloed, bullshitted. In the 32 months since Moore's film won the Cannes Film Festival's Palme d'Or and went on to be the highest-grossing documentary in cinema, it has—while sitting more or less quietly on the video store shelves—been transmuted from a pop-politics firebomb to a work of rueful prophecy.

As I write this, it's several days after President Bush's speech about a troop escalation in Iraq. According to a recent USA Today/Gallup poll, 47% to 49% of Americans now believe the United States is likely to lose the war in Iraq, and the president's Iraq approval ratings are hanging in the upper 20s. Estimates of the war's cost range from about $360 billion to an inconceivable $1 trillion or more, according to Columbia University economist and Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz. The American death toll is more than 3,000 and the U.N.'s estimate of Iraqi deaths for 2006 alone exceeds 34,000.

Who could have predicted it would all go so badly? Michael Moore, for one. Not because Moore was such an expert at war and grand-scale history, but because he had a hunch, an intuition, that Bush was a piker. And for whatever faults and prosecutorial shadings of fact he is guilty of in "Fahrenheit 9/11"—these have been ably documented by writer Christopher Hitchens and the quite levelheaded Dave Kopel—Moore's singular premise has been vindicated by events: An incapable and incurious man with a delinquent sense of history took us to war under false pretenses, with the wrong people, with all the swagger of a warrior who had never been to war. I can't imagine anyone, no matter how rabidly Republican, who would not wince at the footage of President Bush prancing around the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln in a Navy flight suit. In the words of Bugs Bunny, "WHAT A MAROON."...

http://www.latimes.com/features/magazine/west/la-tm-neil05feb04,0,5646707.story?coll=la-home-magazine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Everyone should play their DVD again tonight...it will blow you away even more now.
I watched it again a few days ago it was amazing what is on it and how much I'd forgotten...that hit home even harder today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. good article, but
Didn't Hitchens' debunking get debunked?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Yeah, pretty much. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. Hitchens's Hatchet Piece was a Windy Fraud
Edited on Tue Feb-06-07 03:17 AM by petgoat
The title promised "The lies of Michael Moore."

But I doubt many got past the first two bloated paragraphs to reach
the bottom line: "'fact-checking' is beside the point."

http://www.slate.com/id/2102723/

Equally fraudulent is Dave Kopel's (NOT Ted Koppel's) stupid "59 Deceits" site.

In Deceit #3, Kopel claims that Jeffrey Toobin (who'd appeared in F911 saying
"under every scenario Gore won the election") admitted this applied only in
certain scenarios. Follow Kopel's link, and you see Toobin said nothing of
the sort.

http://www.davekopel.com/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm


Both of these pieces were clearly designed to be weighed, not read, and their
obesity mistaken for substance.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sydny1039 Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #23
43. Thank you. Your work should be published!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Funny you should bring this up. A friend saw this for the first time last night.
She wasn't much of a Bush fan before but the movie pissed her off so much, she couldn't sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. I watched it last night
I looked at the faces of all those soldiers in the film and I wondered if they were still alive. I cried when Lila Lipscomb stood before the White House with rage and anguish.

I don't want to be right anymore. I want it to be over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. "Staged!! It's all STAGED!!"
I wonder what became of that woman and what she thinks of her monkey President now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'm sure she's still 100% behind her Fuhrer
People like her are never wrong, you know.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. What was her parting comment?
Blame Al Qaeda!

I wonder if she shows that bit of movie magic at her dinner parties?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. i watched it last week. every once in awhile i watch this movie.
can't quite pinpoint why--but i do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. my sentiments, exactly
:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dammit Ann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. My sentiments exactly.
I'm so weary of all of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hopefully MM will do the rumored sequel to F 9/11.
Edited on Mon Feb-05-07 03:34 PM by roamer65
The original has become very hard to watch now, last time I did, the tears started to roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I cried everytime I watched it...I tell my kids it's the saddest movie ever made.
I remember first watching it back in '04. When it got to the part about the Carlye Group, I didn't pay much attention...I was more interested in 9-11 and the war...now I realize the Carlye Group and Halliburton is the reason why we're there in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wasn't Moore supposedly working on a sequel: F 9/11 1/2?
Or did I dream that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukkha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. yes it's in production
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0433561/

along with "Sicko" his documentary on the US health care system, or lack thereof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hell yeah. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. My brother, a felafel-head, who sucks up Faux propaganda routinely...
Comdemns Michael Moore and Fahrehiet 9/11 without ever having seen them. He absolutely refuses to see it, but has 1,000 criticisms of it....Bwa ha ha ha ha.

Typical freeper refusal to face facts. Small-minded prejudice, that's the republicon mindset.

Thankfully, only 30% or less of the American public is so weak and small-minded as to judge something they have not got the guts to watch. That's what makes republicon chickehawks so numerous and pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jonathan50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. You are wrong about the true cost of the Iraq war
http://niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=background.view&backgroundid=00138

Two scholars, one a Nobel Prize winner, revisit their estimate of the true cost of the Iraq war – and find that $2 trillion was too low. They consider not only the current and future budgetary costs, but the economic impact of lives lost, jobs interrupted and oil prices driven higher by political uncertainty in the Middle East.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. $2 trillion. Such an inconceivable amount of money.
And certainly more than enough to pay for every social program and to fully finance the safety net, right?

Not to mention the cost in lives and all the anguish around the globe.

BTW, welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdnwannabe Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
36. Just remember - according to Grover Norquist....
they don't want to fund social programs. In fact, I remember hearing something about drowning government in the bath tub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Oh yeah. They'd rather burn the money than
to think of anyone getting it who actually NEEDED.

Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdnwannabe Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. Thanks - yeah, I guess what they are doing to our treasury....
is as good as burning it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'd love to watch it again n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. Oh bullshit
Moore didn't just have a hunch. And who is this we, kemosabe?

Millions of people, including Moore, knew that Bush and the neo-cons were eager for war with Iraq. They didn't just have a gut feeling, they actually examined the evidence, studied Bush & Co's past acts and the reasons Bush would want to invade Iraq of all places, read about the strategic oil/petrodollar issues in play, studied up on PNAC, and refused to be cowed into war based on fearmongering of the worst sort. Moore was a realist- he didn't just get lucky in his opinion of Bush's war.


Yes, I know the article is supposed to be flattering. But only in a backhanded way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
39. You are correct. The article begins by treating Moore
quite dismissively, putting forth the completely inaccurate rightwing stereotype of him as some sort of raving lunatic of the left who just happened by dumb luck to be right this time. Certainly not an admission that Mr. Moore had done his homework and knew from the beginning that the reasons for war were bogus.

Today I heard Al Franken yabber on about how everyone including himself had been duped into thinking the war was necessary. Oh, really? Not so fast. Millions of people who were paying attention weren't duped. Michael Moore certainly wasn't duped. You weren't duped and neither was I.

If people were fooled, it was because accepting the lies from this criminal cabal was easier and required less effort than seeking out the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. It really scares me that Franken wants to run for the Senate...
he's another ignorant DLC type that we really don't need. He's NOT aware of the poop under the scoop that he gets from the media. He, thinking he's a "liberal", prolly DID support the war to begin with. Folks on DU didn't fall for the war talk for even a minute. We knew who we were dealing with.

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. everytime a right winger wanted slam that movie they admitted they didnt see it
I fail to see what if anything is false in that movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. I came to activism by challenging people on the internet
Edited on Tue Feb-06-07 03:28 AM by petgoat
"What are the lies of F911?"

There are no lies. Except he said Bush's inaugural motorcade was
"pelted with eggs." Only one egg has been documented. He eggzaggerated.

I went to see F911 very reluctantly. I thought Moore was an arrogant
self-important jerk, and I'd heard the movie was mean-spirited and full
of lies. Finally I went, feeling it was my duty. I saw that fact-checking
was done by a respected law firm.

I was shaken by the film, and decided to find the lies. I figured I'd start
with the easiest--Gore really won the 2000 election. I mean, how loony can
you be?

I found out it was true. I found out the report saying it was true was just
about to be released in early September of 2001.... when history intervened.
I found that when the report finally was released 11/11/01, all the newspaper
articles on it spun the story so that the fact that Gore got more votes,
reported way at the bottom, seemed immaterial.

Then the stats on the 2004 election were all hinky, and I started studying
9/11, and I realized our nation is in peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Moore got the New Yorker's libel lawyers to review everything THREE times.
The best libel/slander attorneys in the business certified that EVERYTHING in that movie is TRUE.
There is NO way to say that it's wrong. That's why Freepers hate it and refuse to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. The story goes that Moore was offered the Rathergate documents,
but since his fact checkers could not authenticate them, he
declined the bait.

Haven't verified it, myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. His healthcare doc should be out soon, now.
That will be a barn-burner!

I hope it opens the eyes of all those asleep concerning Single Payer Universal Health care!

Valentine greetings for Michael Moore! :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cell Whitman Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
22. Link to F911 at Googlevids
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6387831398516462334&q=farenheit+911

I think they have speed a little fast his voice sounds a bit odd to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
26. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Rabble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
28. K & R for sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
29. To me it'll look the same - I didn't change any views on the matter
But I am glad this came out. It was brave of MM to make the movie when he did - when the 2 candidates the Democratic party machine put on the ticket were war supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. MM was ostracized for telling the truth.
We watched it last week, and I hope he is working on a sequel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
33. The new title should be Fahrenheit 9/11 part 2 - told ya so!
if part 2 is to be made it would be 'told ya so' because it's all coming out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. It really IS TV Nation after all. Too bad that show went off air
hilarious episode on NYC's garbage being sent to some county in TX with crap-flinging trucks out in the fields...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
35. And that one is also so..... telling:
"This is an impressive crowd. The haves... (laughters...)... and the havemores (louder laughters...). Some people call you the elite. I call you my base." - aWoLiar Bu$che

$acrifice? Anyone? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
37. I just clicked on link to watch it...
again..

It's been a long time since I saw f911..

I got through the first 45 seconds.. I couldn't watch it. Maybe another time. Right now, I need to stay strong to fight this twisted administration.. and I can't see through the tears after just 45 seconds of this movie.

Maybe another day. Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
42. I still burn and give away free copies of this movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC