Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Enforced orthodoxies and Iran -- excellent commentary from Glenn Greenwald, "Patriot Act..." author

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 03:36 PM
Original message
Enforced orthodoxies and Iran -- excellent commentary from Glenn Greenwald, "Patriot Act..." author
Comment:
This commentary from the author of "How Should a Patriot Act" is timely reading. On the one hand we have this very obvious push toward war by powerful interests who not only have much influence in the Republican Party, but the Democratic Party as well, despite the fact that most citizens want nothing to do with another war.

He points out that despite the harsh rhetoric used by Ms. Clinton when speaking before AIPAC last Friday evening, which concerned many people here at DU. But the concern among AIPAC loyalists was that it was not harsh enough. Is this the kind of special interest group we want Democratic candidates to serve?

On January 28th, Senator Schumer was on Meet the Press, and talked about the danger of "special interest groups". He gave one example:

When I got to Congress in 1980, for instance, and that was—that was about crime was ripping apart my district. I come to Washington, and I find out that the ACLU is writing crime legislation, has a veto over any piece of crime legislation.


If Sen Schumer can bring up a group like the ACLU, it seems about time we can bring up for discussion groups like AIPAC, and discuss their influence and their work to promote militaristic policies that most people don't want (including most Jewish Americans).
___________________________________________________________

Here are some excerpts from Greenwald's essay, but by all means read the http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2007/02/enforced-orthodoxies-and-iran.html">whole thing.


On Thursday, the neoconservative New York Sun published a remarkable article reporting on an event to be held that night by AIPAC, at which Hillary Clinton was to deliver the keynote address and John Edwards was to appear at the pre-speech cocktail party. The article made several points which are typically deemed off-limits to opponents of neoconservatism -- ones which almost invariably provoke accusations of anti-semitism when made by others.

First, the Sun noted how important AIPAC's support and financial contributions are to presidential candidates:

"When it comes to important gatherings like this, there is going to be a lot of pressure on the major candidates to not let one of their competitors have the room to themselves," a Democratic strategist , Daniel Gerstein, said.

Tonight's event is the first time any of the 2008 candidates have competed for attention in the same room since they launched their campaigns in earnest. It is also an important illustration of just how much stock all of the presidential candidates, Democrats and Republicans alike, will put in the pro- Israel community, particularly for campaign dollars.


http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2007/02/enforced-orthodoxies-and-iran.html

I believe we should confront all lobbies for militarism, including aipac.
www.StopAIPAC.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
He closes with:

And, of course, 3 out of 4 American Jews voted against George Bush in 2004, notwithstanding the fact that (or because) Bush's Middle East militarism was a predominant issue in the campaign. Despite their influence, Jewish neoconservatives and groups like AIPAC are highly unrepresentative of American Jews as a whole. Those facts only further undescore the baselessness and pure malice driving the attempt to equate opposition to their agenda with "anti-semitism."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC