Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Judiciary Committee Gives WH More Time on Wiretapping Subpoenas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:48 AM
Original message
Senate Judiciary Committee Gives WH More Time on Wiretapping Subpoenas
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003717.php

SJC Gives WH More Time on Wiretapping Subpoenas
By Spencer Ackerman - July 18, 2007, 11:05 AM

Sometimes comity is possible, even when it comes to oversight on potentially illegal surveillance programs.

Today was the deadline set by the Senate Judiciary Committee for the White House to respond to a subpoena for documents establishing the origins and scope of the Bush administration's warrantless surveillance program. But yesterday, White House counsel Fred Fielding -- who's locked in subpoena battles with the committee and its House counterpart over the U.S. attorney scandal -- wrote to chairman Pat Leahy (D-VT) and asked for more time to dig through "a wide range of materials" possibly relevant to the subpoena. Leahy agreed, citing his willingness to "accommodate reasonable requests."

There's no new deadline for compliance attached to the subpoena extension. Leahy said that he hopes the White House "uses this additional time constructively to finish gathering the relevant information and then works with us in good faith on ways to provide it." That's the big question: whether Fielding and his counterparts on the National Security Council and vice president's office will pull a Harriet Miers and rebuff the congressional demand.

So far the White House isn't tipping its hand. The White House has regretted, in a spokesman's words last month, the committee's "route of confrontation," but it hasn't ruled out any course of action. Yet given how much value the White House has attached to the long-secret surveillance program -- and, of course, the lingering questions over its legality -- compliance with the subpoena would be a remarkable decision for the administration.

According to a committee staffer, negotiations between the White House and the committee for determining a reasonable time frame for the subpoena extension are set to begin in the coming days.

Update: Read the White House's letters to the committee here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. roll over, drop trou, and pretend to be suprised when they screw you Leahy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I disagree. You have to be somewhat reasonable, sometimes
I imagine that Fred is a busy boy these days. Poor baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. being reasonable when dealing with reasonable people is one thing. Being
"reasonable" when dealing with the bush junta is being used, being played a fool, being naive, being cowardly. Sorry - they have proven over and over again that they are NOT going to play fair, or abide by the rules. If Dems continue to play this same "reasonable" game over and over again and expect different results than the last time... well - see my post above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R. Imagine how difficult it is to deal with these liars and snakes!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. "...no new deadline for compliance"
How accommodating!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC