Flynt Hint: says he has "solid leads" on an '08 candidate...

And since he's hot on the trail of self-righteous, moralizing hypocrites... who could it be?


http://news.cincypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070719/EDIT/707190302/1003

I talked to Flynt shortly after last week's announcement. I wondered if he is bitter that Vitter had beaten him to the announcement. "Listen," he said, "we're going to have a field day with all the new material we've collected."

"I have never had so many promising leads from an ad," he told me. "The results have shocked a cynical old fellow like myself."

<snip>

In terms of partisanship, he was also quite blunt. "I cut nobody no slack: I let the chips fall where they may," he said.

Finally I asked Flynt a question burning in the minds of so many D.C. insiders. Would he be willing to say, for the record, whether or not he had any solid leads on '08 presidential candidates.

He chuckled, "We definitely do."



I HOPE it's this guy:



Why would Flynt go after Giuliani? As mayor of NYC, Rudy launched a jihad on pornographers/pornography/sex clubs and sex-oriented businesses:



http://race42008.com/2007/07/18/2742/

Here’s part of a 1994 New York Times Article:

“City Council members yesterday agreed to Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani’s plan for a one-year moratorium on opening or expanding any sex-oriented video store, theater or bar. … Norman Siegel, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said the moratorium was a violation of the First Amendment, and added that he expected his group would file a suit against the city on behalf of the adult-entertainment businesses.”

In 2001, The New York daily News reported:

Mayor Giuliani revived his crusade to crush smut shops and X-rated clubs yesterday - vowing to seal a loophole in a 1990s law that failed to slow the topless dancing and porno video trades in many neighborhoods. … The mayor said his proposal would let city inspectors take into account other factors - such as the prominence of sex-related items - when deciding whether to shut an establishment. The proposal also would require owners to place partitions between the adult and non-adult portions of their businesses - helping to end “sham efforts” to sidestep the law, Giuliani said.”

The New York Daily News also reported in 2001:

“Mayor Giuliani’s tough new zoning restrictions on sex shops drew mostly yelps of protest yesterday at their first public airing at City Hall. The complaints came from a parade of lawyers for X-rated businesses, the New York Civil Liberties Union … the proposed new restrictions, which are aimed at tightening the definition of adult establishments subject to the much-litigated 1995 zoning law. Eliminated would be the so-called 60-40 loophole that allowed scores of sex-related businesses to stay open by devoting at least 60% of their inventory or floor space to nonadult material or activities. The proposed new rules would empower the city Buildings Department commissioner to use customer activity and volume of sales, along with physical features, to impose the zoning restrictions.”


:popcorn: :rofl:

This is great! Merry Flyntsmas to everyone! :) :rofl:

Look out, Ms. Gabor and Ms. Taylor, Rudy's closing in your record number of marriages. :rofl:

just a hunch.

staff.

What is the statute of limitations on sleaze?

the serial adulterer/ghoul..if I were a betting woman.

ol' rudy rudy rudy has that "I got testosterone to burn" mentality.

I don't know whether that means it's less likely or not.

Clearly, Rudy has little, if any inhibitions about just about anything. He's an immoral phony with no self-discipline.

:popcorn:

the more holier than thou they are the more freaky they become

:evilgrin:

I think he'd be the easiest to beat (in the present Repub field, including Thompson).

I don't that lying pecker had a chance anyway, but I'm going to go ahead and hope it's him.

:evilgrin:

:evilgrin:

But he was so far from being a viable contender that he's not even worth exposing...

So if one of our Dem candidates is such a person...actually I don't think any of them have been all about teh bedroom regulating.

http://news.cincypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070719/EDIT/707190302/1003

We're not the "Family Values" moralzing crowd.

But talking to Flynt, one quickly sees that this is in no way a game for this man. This is a moral issue. Say what you will about Flynt's business, his ethics on the subject are pretty clear. Hypocrisy, Flynt explained, was the cross from misdemeanor to felony in his mind.

"I couldn't care less what people do in private," he said, "but if someone's a public figure, and taking a position that's contrary to the way they lead their private lives, people deserve to know."

I wouldn't lose any sleep over losing one of THOSE seats.

who would that leave for the Republicans?

Oh please oh please let it be Brownback. My best guess is that it is not but a girl can dream can't she?

Huckabee? Boy, his wife will be stuck since they have a covenant marriage or is there an out for infidelity?

It could be anyone, even a Dem but I don't recall a lot of moralizing from the Dem candidates.

His crooked campaign with Ollie North backing him up. He's a scary character.

He's the worst of the bunch.

maybe thats why he is not announcing that hes running. to see if his name on the the "list"

:)

nt

No "lady" would ever been seen with that man. LOL :)

Maybe I should've said "ladies."

He's their DRRRRRRRRRRRRRREAM Candidate! :loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya::loveya:


:rofl:

BTW, that Star Shephard is scaaaary! YIKES!

are already well know.

Now a Fred Thompson whoremonger would be a beautiful thing to behold.
Mitt would be another hoot.

John McCain...here's why.

Remember in 2000 there was a whispering campaign in South Carolina as to whether it would change your opinion of John McCain if you knew he had an illegitimate child? This baseless push poll most certainly DID come from the Bushies as they were getting ready to be trounced. But it does make you wonder if there was something behind it in light of this scandal...

Just say'n...

:bounce:

That baby story was a cruel bullshit smear. The McCains adopted their child fair and square.

thought it made them seem like nice people with big hearts.

If they're in any way abusive it's beyond cruel...

but he was the appointed one.

btw that poll came from Rove. It has his smell and his fingerprints are all over that smear.

Now, wouldn't THAT be interesting?

What the hell would America do?

seems to come with being in positions of power and influence.

She'll get my vote!! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

If she goes outside, it's surely a not-for-profit deal with a mature adult friend who has the sense to keep his/her mouth firmly sealed shut.

(There have been rumors on various LGBT gossip lists about Hillary being bisexual or lesbian for many years, but not a single potential partner name has surfaced. The National Enquirer mention of Vince Foster doesn't count because he's in no position to sue their asses off.)

and Al Gore would get into the race. :thumbsup:

Rooting round with Rudy is the Root Of All Evil!

The Didee has done hit the fans I'd say. SEX sells and the GOPers know it's their turn over the barrel this time. They have lost the WAR, the congress, the National Security expert image, the tax and spend argument, the nation building argument, the states rights argument, the compassionate conservative argument, and NOW the "MORAL high ground," mojo...Bush at 24%...Cheney prolly below 10% now.

The democrats gave the GOPers all the rope they needed to hang themselves and now Larry Flynt is getting ready to kick the chair out from under them! The same chair they once kicked out from under Bill Clinton...who says there's no justice left in America?

At least, thanks to Larry Flynt, we know why the GOPers always seem to have a case of the red ass...didee rash!

the more likely to be child molestors!!!

even with his suckup to the religious right. Brownback, however--oh, yeah!

Hollywood hoping to make it in the movies. That's my take on it anyway. You know how conservatives are always complaining about how decadent Hollywood is? Well apparently Fred has gotten a good view from the trenches.

So he could easliy be a client.

But I think the reason he's not running yet so he can fulfill his Law & Order committments. NBC would have to shelve any episodes or reruns after he officially announces, or be obligated to give other candidates 'equal time'. Once the Summer TV season is over, he will probably announce. I think he's letting NBC finish out their already-scheduled shows.

But Fred Thompson would be good too, since the wingnuts are looking to him as their savior in '08.

(just to be bipartisan). It would probably have to be someone in Washington over the years. Hope not Edwards or Obama!

that's leaves out our Democrats. He's outing ONLY the hypocrites and that would be the repukes.

Thompson obviously goes for the younger women.

Though, I wouldn't be surprised if he was on the list.:)

Didn't Flynt hint that another Senator was in his crosshairs? So...

That could be Senators Brownback, McCain, Clinton, Biden, Dodd and Obama... of that group, I'd say Brownback is Flynt's likely target.

:woohoo:

and collect a million dollars.

And an extra seat in The Senate.

i don't know the point of these hints, vitter is still there, he's not going anywhere, publish any photos you got on him and same for the other evil doers

they are not folding like a cheap suit the way bob livingston did, time to put the real embarrassment on them

and it would be fairly useless information as both have acknowledged adultery...

Thompson or Romney would be politically helpful...

Just sayin...

Early on in the Cunningham investigation and sentencing I think Hunter's name came up as being connected to both the Dukestir and Jack Abramoff.

He is definitely a second tier Repub candidate, but he might be a likely choice.

And I'll LOVE it if it's Romney, the phoney bastard.

...went out back and got some booty

Tutti Fruiti, good booty

Wait until it is too late to change a state's ballot.

If this person is a front runner I really hope he waits to disclose the info until after/if they get the nomination.

with laws of the various states dealing with candidates being allowed on the ballot. Remember one state had a question about if bush should even be on the ballot because he wasn't nominated before the deadline for inclusion on the ballot. I think it was Missouri. Not sure.

Oh please.....the most self-righteous one of them all.

I wouldn't be shocked by anyone else. I certainly wouldn't be shocked by Rudy. His philandering is old news...

not saying he wasn't naughty before he got the cancer, though.

Anyway, Rudy's been upfront about his hanky panky so he wouldn't be a surprise to Flynt at all.

surely Flynt remembers that!

My money's on Rudy and/or Goodhair. :popcorn:

who is he?

They used to call him Governor Goodhair but Mittens seems to be more popular now.

Wisconsin Democrats and reporters have just never thought it was right to use it against him.

Here's a post from the forum linked below, representative of what I've heard in Wisconsin many times over many years:

"I am a lifelong resident of Wisconsin (except for 10 years in school and military service). I have a close friend who was a legislative aide in Wisconsin (State Senate) for about 20 years, which spanned the time Thompson was governor. He told me numerous times over those years that it was common knowledge in Madison political circles that Thompson had extra-marital relationships - of the sexual variety.

My friend and I are Democrats and I asked him why they never used it against him. He said that the Democrats considered that to be cheap, gutter politics that they did not want to lower themselves to. Thompson, even though he was a dishonest partisan in most matters, at least wasn’t such a hypocrite that he would make a big deal accusing Democrats of not having “family values.” He knew, I’m sure, that if he did, his own behavior would see the light of day, too."


http://pandagon.net/2007/04/05/tommys-fun-lovin-past-may-emerge/

I Brownback, Huckabee, Tancredo, Hunter would all be better candidates for a sexpose that would show any of them up as hypocrites.

Even I would be very surprised.

And I know he ain't running

I'm sick of these puppet "leaders".

The entertainment value would be just PRICELESS.

Hey, a man can dream, can't he?