Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jobs to record labels: Unlock your music (Reuters/CNNMoney.com)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 04:26 PM
Original message
Jobs to record labels: Unlock your music (Reuters/CNNMoney.com)
Apple CEO says music industry is plowing a lot of effort into protection software that may not be worth it.

February 6 2007: 3:39 PM EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) -- Apple Inc. Chief Executive Steve Jobs called on the four major record companies Tuesday to start selling songs online without copy protection software known as digital rights management (DRM).

In a statement posted to his company's Web site, Jobs said there appeared to be no benefit to the record companies to continue to sell more than 90 percent of their music without DRM on compact discs while selling the remaining small percentage of their music protected with such a system.
***
http://money.cnn.com/2007/02/06/news/companies/apple_drm.reut/index.htm?postversion=2007020615

http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/



Thoughts on Music

Steve Jobs
February 6, 2007

With the stunning global success of Apple’s iPod music player and iTunes online music store, some have called for Apple to “open” the digital rights management (DRM) system that Apple uses to protect its music against theft, so that music purchased from iTunes can be played on digital devices purchased from other companies, and protected music purchased from other online music stores can play on iPods. Let’s examine the current situation and how we got here, then look at three possible alternatives for the future.

To begin, it is useful to remember that all iPods play music that is free of any DRM and encoded in “open” licensable formats such as MP3 and AAC. iPod users can and do acquire their music from many sources, including CDs they own. Music on CDs can be easily imported into the freely-downloadable iTunes jukebox software which runs on both Macs and Windows PCs, and is automatically encoded into the open AAC or MP3 formats without any DRM. This music can be played on iPods or any other music players that play these open formats.

The rub comes from the music Apple sells on its online iTunes Store. Since Apple does not own or control any music itself, it must license the rights to distribute music from others, primarily the “big four” music companies: Universal, Sony BMG, Warner and EMI. These four companies control the distribution of over 70% of the world’s music. When Apple approached these companies to license their music to distribute legally over the Internet, they were extremely cautious and required Apple to protect their music from being illegally copied. The solution was to create a DRM system, which envelopes each song purchased from the iTunes store in special and secret software so that it cannot be played on unauthorized devices.

Apple was able to negotiate landmark usage rights at the time, which include allowing users to play their DRM protected music on up to 5 computers and on an unlimited number of iPods. Obtaining such rights from the music companies was unprecedented at the time, and even today is unmatched by most other digital music services. However, a key provision of our agreements with the music companies is that if our DRM system is compromised and their music becomes playable on unauthorized devices, we have only a small number of weeks to fix the problem or they can withdraw their entire music catalog from our iTunes store.

To prevent illegal copies, DRM systems must allow only authorized devices to play the protected music. If a copy of a DRM protected song is posted on the Internet, it should not be able to play on a downloader’s computer or portable music device. To achieve this, a DRM system employs secrets. There is no theory of protecting content other than keeping secrets. In other words, even if one uses the most sophisticated cryptographic locks to protect the actual music, one must still “hide” the keys which unlock the music on the user’s computer or portable music player. No one has ever implemented a DRM system that does not depend on such secrets for its operation.

(more at the link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess I just don't "get" this music stuff. Why do people "have" to have
Edited on Tue Feb-06-07 05:01 PM by SoCalDem
personalized music blasted into their head 24/7?

Aren't there still radios?

When I'm in the car, anytime i want to hear music, I can always just turn the radio on (I have sirius, but even before i had it, there was always music on).

I see all these blank-eyed people wandering around with gadgets hooked to their ears, and thin cords dangling from them. Perhaps these are devices to purposely tune people out from what's real, right in fron of their faces..

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reverend_Smitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I get what you are saying to a point
I would much rather get my music fix from the radio because it would sure be a lot cheaper but since all of the media consolidation of the last 10 or so years it seems like every FM station is a carbon copy of each other and you hear the same 20 songs played over and over because the record labels paid the Clear Channel stations top dollar to do so. Commercial radio is crap these days, I find myself tuning in NPR more and more when I'm in my car just because I can't find anything better to listen to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. WGMS, the former classical station in DC, is now straight commercial crap. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zensea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It has to do with having good taste for some of us
Sure, there are those who zone out, but speaking for myself,I don't. I'd probably be called a music snob though. I'd much rather listen to my own personalized selection than have something fed into me by big corporations. Most of the stuff I listen to rarely gets played on the radio. Tom Ze, Serge Gainsbourg, John Zorn, Bill Frisell, Manu Chao, Lee Perry, electric Miles Davis, something other than a ballad by Coltrane or any great jazz musician ... just for starters.
The radio sucks. You have to wade through commercials constantly. They play the same stuff over and over. "Classic" rock consists of three or four songs by each selected band and nothing else.
I can remember when radio was decent back in the 60s with all genres represented on the same station, none of this playlist shit that we have now and marketing to select niches.

I pay plenty of attention to what is right in front of my face.
Your comment strikes me as groupthink of its own actually, because I hear it all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Radio channels play what the owners want...
and for satellite radio, it's a big-ass monthly premium plus hardware. I dunno the cost of XM or Sirius, but in the end the price is the same and I've yet to see a device that records satellite transmissions. :7

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. because the radio sucks?!
The radio plays what the music corps want them to in order to move units.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. BRAVO!!!!!!!
I don't file share and I shouldn't have to be punished because of it.

Especially when Apple's DRM limits me to 5 machines. Once I've reformatted my computer 3 more times, or buy 3 more down the road, my 'licenses' are toast. :eyes: For $1 per song, Apple's gettin' a good deal, but at least they allow burning to CD - most online vendors won't. Apple is fairly benign when it comes to DRM and I'll readily applaud them for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC