|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:09 PM Original message |
Conyers: Impeachment is not a no-brainer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hmm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. Sounds like he is more concernd about the impact of impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. It will hurt either way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. that's a valid concern... any chess players here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I think he would admit that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buns_of_Fire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:34 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Which would also explain the "retroactive impeachment" comment, I suppose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. They lay the same bet in '88 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yes I was just reading your other post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. so why was he so gung ho for it before the dems got into power? actions are louder than words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. He is being directed not to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Good strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Conyers has been in Congress for 40 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Absolutely agree ~ he is a real leader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. That may be so and why he was in position for his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. if he's cooperating with the leadership, it's because he has chosen to do so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. True. And the Democrats have been out of power for so long, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
40. Sure, he's in mortal danger of losing his position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
41. I would bet it is Rahm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
25. Obviously, it's easier to talk tough when you know you don't have to back it up.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
15. Damn cowards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Conyers knows that Bush is gone in 2009 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. What kind of nation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:56 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. if that was the case, then how would impeachment solve it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. "There are no easy fixes" - not according to many here.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Fine, let it all slide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. That's not the other option. It is a common strawman however... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Not impeaching is letting impeachment slide or am I missing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. You are missing something. That's why you resorted to a strawman. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Then tell me what I'm missing instead of throwing accusations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Why don't you go back and address the previous post without the strawman for a start.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. I will apologize to the poster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Then, as far as I can tell. We're all in agreement. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. I think the current course is not proper nor adequate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
38. I apologize Enrique for my letting it all slide comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
17. He Needs More Evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. So the legal scholars and constitutional lawyers have all this wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. And They're On The Judiciary Committee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Maybe. Scholars sometimes disagree, so even scholars can be wrong n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debbierlus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
19. I am calling my Congress member now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
22. Honestly, I think this issue is too important to weigh against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. Ah, but impeachment doesn't punish, only conviction does. Cen we get a conviction? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
27. Keep It Up John! We're With You And Got Your Back! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
3waygeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
43. He's right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC