Was there a White House plot to illegally suppress votes in 2004?

babylonsister

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-24-07 07:13 PM
Original message

Was there a White House plot to illegally suppress votes in 2004?

Edited on Tue Jul-24-07 07:25 PM by babylonsister

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/25047

Was there a White House plot to illegally suppress votes in 2004?
Submitted by davidswanson on Wed, 2007-07-25 00:05. Evidence | Video and Audio

NOW on PBS:

Is there a similar plan for the upcoming elections? On Friday July 27 at 8:30 pm (check local listings), NOW examines documents and evidence that points to a Republican Party plan designed to keep Democrats from voting, by targeting people based on their race and ethnicity. Congress is investigating, and so are we. We speak with David Iglesias, one of eight fired U.S. Attorneys, who says he lost his job because he refused to go along with the White House plan to suppress votes. The NOW website at www.pbs.org/now will feature an extended interview with David Iglesias and reveal key e-mails and documents covered in our investigation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Patsy Stone

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-24-07 07:14 PM
Response to Original message

1. I've always said so.

Nice of PBS to get in on the action. :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ClassWarrior

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-24-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. Know-it-all...

:hi: Pats!

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Patsy Stone

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-24-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #2

6. I believe

:hi:, honey!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ClassWarrior

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-24-07 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #6

10. Me too, dalling...

Me too.

:toast:

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

blogslut

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-24-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1

5. I agree

Good to see PBS is sloughing off some of that repub-crony taint.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Patsy Stone

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-24-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #5

7. They have a lot of ground to make up.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

blogslut

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-24-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #7

9. backatcha!

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

babylonsister

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-24-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1

8. Yes, good to see.

:hi: :thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

porphyrian

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-24-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message

3. Only for non-whites. - n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

killbotfactory

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-24-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message

4. Isn't that what the attorney firing were about?

Or was that the 2006 election?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ClassWarrior

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-24-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #4

11. No, you're right, it was about 2004. When the Bushbot USAs trumped up...

..."voter fraud" cases to taint Dems and distract from the very real wholesale election theft occurring.

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:28 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.