Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Disfavor for Bush Hits Rare Heights"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 11:48 PM
Original message
"Disfavor for Bush Hits Rare Heights"
Edited on Tue Jul-24-07 11:51 PM by G_j
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/24/AR2007072402263_pf.html

Disfavor for Bush Hits Rare Heights
In Modern Era, Only Nixon Scored Worse, And Only Truman Was Down for So Long

By Peter Baker
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 25, 2007; A03

President Bush is a competitive guy. But this is one contest he would rather lose. With 18 months left in office, he is in the running for most unpopular president in the history of modern polling.

The latest Washington Post-ABC News survey shows that 65 percent of Americans disapprove of Bush's job performance, matching his all-time low. In polls conducted by The Post or Gallup going back to 1938, only once has a president exceeded that level of public animosity -- and that was Richard M. Nixon, who hit 66 percent four days before he resigned.

The historic depth of Bush's public standing has whipsawed his White House, sapped his clout, drained his advisers, encouraged his enemies and jeopardized his legacy. Around the White House, aides make gallows-humor jokes about how they can alienate their remaining supporters -- at least those aides not heading for the door. Outside the White House, many former aides privately express anger and bitterness at their erstwhile colleagues, Bush and the fate of his presidency.

Bush has been so down for so long that some advisers maintain it no longer bothers them much. It can even, they say, be liberating. Seeking the best interpretation for the president's predicament, they argue that Bush can do what he thinks is right without regard to political cost, pointing to decisions to send more U.S. troops to Iraq and to commute the sentence of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff.

..more..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.democrats.org/a/2007/07/bush_approval_r_3.php

Bush Approval Rating Down to 25%
Posted by Stephanie Taylor on July 23, 2007 at 02:20 PM

With just hours until the first Democratic Party-sanctioned debate, we learn that President Bush's approval ratings have fallen to record lows. Again.

According to a new American Research Group poll, just 25% of Americans approve of the way President Bush is handling his job as president and 71% disapprove. When it comes to Bush's handling of the economy, 23% approve and 73% disapprove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Scares me even more when they feel liberated by their isolation n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Maybe Bush-Cheney learned from Nixon and just created a tighter
inner circle to withstand the criticism? They certainly didn't make Bill Clinton's mistake and put a member of the opposite party in a prosecutorial position that might hurt them.

The only thing that can bring Bush-Cheney down now is having the whole right-wing media circus a'gin them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. That was funny. I took it to be black humour. But the following sentence suggests
it might have been said quiet seriously.

Of course, there have always been, as there are today, politicians who, as far as the political realities will allow, stay true to their convictions, but was there ever a dictator who wasn't a 'conviction' politician, come hell or high water?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. fuck peter baker, the post, the times and all those other vichy stenographers
Edited on Tue Jul-24-07 11:53 PM by Gabi Hayes
I've had it

not that it makes any difference

and, Len Downie, to you, in particular, a VERY hellish afterlife, if there is one

and if there isn't, let the hairy thunderer conjure up one just for YOU

Len

you smug fascist enabler
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. "Vichy stenographers". That's a great way to put it. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Bush can do what he thinks is right without regard to political cost"
"right"?? Farrrrr right. Let's paraphrase this ...

Smirk and Sneer know they can get away with ANYTHING ... WITHOUT fear of any disciplinary action.

None.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. I love this line -
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 12:01 AM by quinnox
"Around the White House, aides make gallows-humor jokes about how they can alienate their remaining supporters -- at least those aides not heading for the door."

LoL

You know things must be bad when the White house aides sit around saying "Hmm, so who can we piss off next that still supports us?" as a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. I really don't
get why the party hasn't taken him down yet ala Nixon. It makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I hope they don't know something we don't n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Decruiter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. I would have thought it should read RARE LOWS!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Its that damned left-leaning press again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. I think to r.e.a.l.l.y get that figure into perspective, and to understand
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 08:39 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
the use made by the politicans of the putative polls for damage limitation purposes (not the Iraqi woman, personally, of course), we need to reflect on something the Iraqi woman in exile in Jordan said, namely: Only (...ONLY) 21% of Iraqis believe that the US presence has worsened the security situation in Iraq!!!!! I don't believe that a 'bona fide' pollster would find half that number sharing that opinion in an institution for the mentally retarded. Heck, even the ones causing the insecurity wouldn't believe that!

And George's popularity rating is claimed to be only 4 percentage points higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. We passed "disfavor" a long freaking time ago
Barely held in check rage and anger is more accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC