I am concerned about the financial motivation behind Perverted Justice and NBC in this as well as the potential for it to do more harm than good. The "Criticisms" section on the Wikipedia entry of PJ are quite important when considering the merits and morality of the show itself and the guilt of their targets. I hate to see such exploitation of people in the name of ridiculous profits for all involved at the expense of hundreds of people and their families.
Are they for profit?
Holy shit...
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/13/technology/13justice.html?ex=1323666000&en=a5d324dfb0a25999&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss"...NBC was paying the group roughly
$70,000 for each hour of television produced."
In looking, I also found this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perverted-Justice Criticism
Perverted-Justice, as well as its volunteers, have been criticized over the years by a number of individuals and organizations.
The critics of the site include the U.S. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC), among others. Tina Schwartz, NCMEC director of communication, has said: "It's really not the safest, most effective way to combat this problem ... From what I've seen ... they embarrass the people, but I don't know that complete justice is ever served".<30>...
Scott Morrow runs Corrupted-Justice, a Web site set up to challenge Perverted-Justice. Morrow told ABC News there is currently
no way to hold Von Erck or any other administrators, operators, or volunteers at Perverted-Justice accountable for mistakes. "When you're running an organization or running a group of people with the potential to do as much damage to people's lives as this does, I think there also has to be some accountability....
Lee Tien, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, is quoted as being concerned that the organization could send real predators into hiding...
Some law-enforcement agencies have also stated that, while they appreciate the site's mission, they do not agree with some of the operators' and volunteers' practices. In a December 2004 article in the New York Sun, Bradley Russ, the training director for the federal Internet Crimes Against Children Taskforce, which employs about 200 federal agents nationwide, said the tactics of Perverted-Justice sometimes run counter to the task force's standards. For instance, Russ said, by accepting child pornography from their "busts" to bolster a potential legal case, the volunteers are themselves in possession of unlawful images. He said federal authorities have begun considering whether to seize Perverted-Justice contributors' computers.
"It's a noble effort gone too far," Russ told the newspaper. He also said
the site's tactics can make it more difficult for law enforcement to prosecute cases they present because those cases can be considered tainted by entrapment claims.<36> According to Russ, "I have a real problem with any citizens' group conducting any investigation into any crime... It's a mistake for law enforcement to abdicate its responsibility to citizens." <37> Said Russ, "I think it's a huge mistake when law enforcement partners with citizens to do investigations. ... I'm very concerned about entrapment issues."
In May of 2007, Perverted Justice was criticized in an employment lawsuit brought by former Dateline producer Marsha Bartel. In the filing, Bartel alleges that
NBC provides financial incentives to the group to use trickery and to humiliate targets to “enhance the comedic effect of the public exposure." According to Bartel, some of the men caught in the Predator sting operations have reported that the decoys begged them to come to the sting houses, even after they had decided to walk away. Perverted Justice responded to the criticism by labeling Bartel a disgruntled former employee motivated by financial gain.