Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

They just stand back and let it all be

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 09:42 AM
Original message
They just stand back and let it all be
http://mediamatters.org/items/200707280001?f=h_top

"Media Matters"; by Jamison Foser

They just stand back and let it all be

Once upon a time, America had a rogue and lawless president who was willing to break the law to destroy his political opponents, use the full force of the federal government to carry out his personal and political whims, and generally act like he was a king, free of either "checks" or "balances." The Washington Post played an historic role in exposing his corruption, his law-breaking, his lack of regard for the Constitution. There is a reason the Post's work inspired a generation of reporters -- and it wasn't just the hopes of being portrayed by Robert Redford on the silver screen. The Post's coverage of Watergate was a heroic effort that stands among the most important work any Americans have ever done in service to their nation.

But that was more than 30 years ago. Today, the Post counts haircuts and estimates cleavage.

That's not completely fair. The Post, like other major news outlets, continues to produce excellent journalism and to cover important stories. The front page of today's Post, for example, includes an article that begins:

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III yesterday contradicted the sworn testimony of his boss, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, by telling Congress that a prominent warrantless surveillance program was the subject of a dramatic legal debate within the Bush administration.

That's an important story, clearly reported, placed prominently on page A1.

So we don't mean to suggest that the nation's news media are completely ignoring important news. They aren't. But we have long noted that leading news outlets like The Washington Post and The New York Times have, by all available evidence, devoted significantly fewer resources to covering scandalous Bush administration actions than they devoted to covering President Clinton's relationship with a staffer.

When the Monica Lewinsky story broke, the Times and the Post -- like nearly every other news outlet in the country -- dedicated extraordinary resources to covering it. The day after the story broke, the Times and the Post ran a combined total of 19 articles about it, five of them on the front page. Twenty-eight reporters combined to write more than 20,000 words about a "scandal" that boiled down to whether the president told the truth about a consensual relationship that was ruled immaterial to a civil lawsuit that was thrown out of court for being entirely without merit. That's 28 reporters and 20,000 words -- at just two newspapers in just one day.

That relentless wall-to-wall coverage continued unabated for more than a year.

Fast-forward a few years. We have a president who has lied to the country in order to take it to war against a nation that didn't attack us, created a network of secret prisons, embraced torture, held people without trial or access to lawyers or even being charged with anything, used the government to spy on its own citizens, used "signing statements" to declare that he will not follow the very laws he is signing, and presided over an administration that is routinely described as "lawless" and that generally behaves as though the United States Congress has no more authority than the Ridgemont High School student council. Among other transgressions against the truth, the law, the Constitution, and human dignity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nice column..
the title caught my eye..it's a reference to a line in Bruce Sprinsteens "Jungleland" :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kicking
Rec'd it a while ago.

Sort of surprised there aren't more responses.

Could be the title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here's a little kick
for ya. It's one of those stories where you just say yep, that's about the size of it. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC