|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:49 PM Original message |
Is the new SPY BILL unconstitutional? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kansasblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. not in this Supreme Court. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Beat me to the obvious response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. The Warren Court would probably have thought so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndrewJacksonFaction (471 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. I would argue that it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trashcanistanista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yes, but I don't think it matters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
5. With the Roverts Court? not likely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burrowowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
6. HELL YES it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
7. Even if it is it's going to cause an deafening uproar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
8. Even if it is, there's no one left to uphold the Constitution. Forget the Roberts Court. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
9. No I think it's the constitution that is unconstitutional in Bushworld. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kansasblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
10. Here is the midwest people ain't got a clue anything is even going on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 10:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. You make a good point. We are all ranting to ourselves, and that does nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kansasblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-05-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. I mentioned Cheney impeach once and got strange looks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Double T (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
11. What Constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
13. Yes, it is, BUT in order to have that adjuticated someone will have to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Agreed. And, there is that sticky clause about "reasonably believed to be" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
14. I do believe it violates the 4th Amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 10:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Agreed. It also sends a message to those outside the US. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-04-07 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
18. I don't think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-05-07 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
20. It doesn't really matter if no one is willing to do anything about it. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:33 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC