NYT: Bill Richardson stands apart from ClintonEdwardsObama on Iraq

Democrats Say Leaving Iraq May Take Years

By JEFF ZELENY And MARC SANTORA
Published: August 12, 2007

DES MOINES, Aug. 11 — Even as they call for an end to the war and pledge to bring the troops home, the Democratic presidential candidates are setting out positions that could leave the United States engaged in Iraq for years.

John Edwards, the former North Carolina senator, would keep troops in the region to intervene in an Iraqi genocide and be prepared for military action if violence spills into other countries. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York would leave residual forces to fight terrorism and to stabilize the Kurdish region in the north. And Senator Barack Obama of Illinois would leave a military presence of as-yet unspecified size in Iraq to provide security for American personnel, fight terrorism and train Iraqis.

These positions and those of some rivals suggest that the Democratic bumper-sticker message of a quick end to the conflict — however much it appeals to primary voters — oversimplifies the problems likely to be inherited by the next commander in chief. Antiwar advocates have raised little challenge to such positions by Democrats.

Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico stands apart, having suggested that he would even leave some military equipment behind to expedite the troop withdrawal. In a forum at a gathering of bloggers last week, he declared: “I have a one-point plan to get out of Iraq: Get out! Get out!”

article: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/us/politics/12dems.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print


. . . notice how they make it seem like ALL Democrats, or at least the bulk of us are for leaving troops in Iraq for 'years' . . . yet another in the latest media campaign to thwart withdrawal by making it appear there's some sort of momentum to put off setting an exit date for another thrown bone.