Kucinich would get Rid of Nuclear weapons! on abc now.

the candidates and I am proud of him for bringing it up!!

if not earlier. Kucinich is sane.

but he said we would lead the way through diplomacy with nuclear powers and those who are not and seek to become a nuclear power.

all the more reason to support him.

I was getting ready to answer you by simply stating, SO?

Dennis Kucinich, I know I can. I know I can

would carry Dennis on our shoulders directly to the White House if we could. Screw the election, this country can't wait that long.

but I would rather carry him around for more people to hear and understand. I try to do that and you know that there are more steadfast Republican's around here that when they hear much of what he stands for, not knowing who he is, are ready to vote for him. Once they find out he is a Democrat a lot of that support goes out the window because we are spineless. Spineless was old, they were ready for us to stand up but we fulfilled their worst fears.

Now I hear that they would rather support a religious ass who is strong and stands up for his convictions no matter what they are than support someone spineless with better ideas. I guess the fear is working.

I have to admit that I do not address that much anymore not being a Democrat and quite frankly I agree with them. I leave it at that since I can't defend them, except for Dennis.

Can we really afford to have nuclear winter? Do we want to destroy the world in order to save it? Stephanopolis gave him a hard time, and Kucinich answered every question effectively. I hope a lot of people got to listen to this--they will see that Kucinich is right on the money on Iraq, nuclear weapons, on dealing with our world problems.

nt

about a dirty bomb. Who would George suggest we nuke in payback for an attack? Ignorant.

I didn't hear a answer from DK..just side stepping as all politicians do.

... that effective intelligence and good police work in advance of an attempt to attack might help to prevent it, and that, in event of an attack, "good old fashioned police work" would be the most effective way to find out exactly who attacked us. Then we could deal with the perpetrators. I believe he then cited our irrational response to the 911 attacks in taking Iraq "off the shelf" and attacking a country that had nothing to do with attacking us.

I thought that was a pretty good response to the "who would you nuke" question.

.rog.

The pro-war wing of the Dems have accepted that also. That's why they keep talking about it. I don't think that they want (per se) to use them, but they've gotten to the point where they can rationalize the usage of nukes in a normal setting.

All the more reason to vote for Dennis.

Go Dennis - kick the war party to the curb!
http://dennis4president.com

concise with Georgie every time Georgie tried to nail him about nuclear deterrence as defense.

I wonder deep down, how many candidates- people- really feel using nukes is a viable option?

How can any candidate who says he gives a flying monkey shit about the environment, keep ANY kind of NUKE on the option table?


Thank god Dennis has the balls & brains to speak out.

Thank you, Dennis.

DR