Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Re: Rove's resignation: Will he be easier to prosecute?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 06:58 AM
Original message
Re: Rove's resignation: Will he be easier to prosecute?
Will he no longer be able to cite executive priveledge? Was he close to being indicted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes
Edited on Mon Aug-13-07 07:02 AM by ThomWV
They will still claim privilege, but no one can deny that he will be less powerful out of the White House than in it and so we come one step closer to the end of this horror and maybe, just maybe, someone paying for the rape of the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. He will be "less powerful"
But still able to advise the administration from the outside. The lines have become blurred; it really doesn't make alot of difference. Remember when Karen Hughes left to "devote more time to her family"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. He may know something that he cannot testify to until he
resigns. He may be a sqealer. He's already a pig. :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. HAH!
Good one, Lint Head!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. He should be
But so far Bush has kept anyone he didn't want to testify from doing so including those no longer at the whitehouse...Harriet...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Agreed, but ....
I agree with you that Bush seems to believe that his protection can carry to the grave but I suspect that the court will not agree or that at least the farther in time one is from the White House the less of its power they can call on.

What bothers me more is that now there is basically no restriction on what he can and can not do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. It will make little difference, although it may help in that he is
not quite as close in presidential protection. It may be easier to investigate him because he would not be right there, with his finger on nerve centers and conscious of every whisper, locking files and hiding shit in the parking garage.

Because his physical presence is probably intimidating, his absence may well encourage potential whistle blowers and injured parties to step up and play Sampson, bringing the temple crashing to earth.

He was apparently pretty close to being indicted in the Plame leak investigation, costing him a number of trips to the grand jury, revising his lies each time and barely escaping the butt whacking he so richly deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. If he is prosecuted, he'll be pardonned
faster than Bush can tank a bottle of bourbon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. They cited exec. privilege for the Tillman case; sure they'll be able
to still use it for Rove. Whether that's legal or not, I don't know, but no one has called the wh on it yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. using executive priviledge to cover other bushies who have resigned...
so the cloak will still cover rove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC