Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep Markey's Response To Indian PM Regarding Nuclear Deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 12:44 PM
Original message
Rep Markey's Response To Indian PM Regarding Nuclear Deal
Edited on Tue Aug-14-07 12:49 PM by RestoreGore
In my view this should not get Congress's approval chiefly because it is a violation of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. We as a nation and as a signatory to that treaty should be DIScouraging nuclear proliferation not proliferating it. This is nothing more to me than a set up by the bastards in Washington Dc to choose sides when their "war" in Iraq spreads. In my view only terrorists make deals regarding nuclear proliferation, not people of peace.

http://www.energy-daily.com/reports/070813173125.h0y0nukd.html

US congressman's response to Indian PM on nuclear deal

by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) Aug 13, 2007

A veteran congressman on Monday branded a landmark US civilian nuclear deal with India as a "capitulation" to New Delhi and demanded details on Indian ties with Iran. Representative Ed Markey released a statement following Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's defense of the accord in a speech to parliament.

"The Bush administration claims it is seeking nuclear cooperation, but in reality, the agreement it negotiated is 'nuclear capitulation' to India's every wish," the Massachusetts Democrat said.

"Prime Minister Singh's comments today are yet another indication that this agreement does not comply with the law Congress wrote and passed last year ... to condition and restrict any agreement.

"As currently drafted, this is a bad deal for our country and a damaging blow to non-proliferation efforts worldwide," Markey said.

The accord, which covers civil nuclear technology, was rejected almost immediately by the Indian opposition and Singh's communist allies.

But in a speech in parliament, Singh said New Delhi had not agreed to "any provision that mandates scrutiny of our nuclear weapons programme or any unsafeguarded nuclear facilities."

"India is committed to a voluntary, unilateral moratorium on nuclear testing," Singh said, adding that the pact did not preclude India from launching future nuclear tests

End of excerpt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-14-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps people will care about this when Musharraf is removed
And the fate of Pakistan's nukes is in question, with "Bin Laden" still supposedly influencing that region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC