This moran:
http://www.gnn.tv/threads/26858/Think_Tank_Suggests_Bush_should_be_President_For_LifeHe just sent me this e-mail. :crazy:
Philip Atkinson <smartboard@bigpond.com>
Sir,
It is not a rebuttal of an argument to make obscure suggestions.
To refute an argument you must point out where the presumptions are wrong or
the logic is in error.
911, the attack on the World trade centre by a barbarian war band, was
predicted in 1952 by professor Arnold Toynbee in " A Study Of History". The
work was a study of civilizations and revealed that Western Civilization was
declining. This meant that as EVERY previous declining civilization was
attacked and destroyed by barbarian war-bands, our civilization would be
attacked and finally destroyed by barbarian war bands.
This raises two significant problems:
1/ Our civilization is declining, a notion that is not generally understood
but is explained at www.ourcivilisation.com/thdetail.htm.
2/ How do you defend yourself against barbarian war bands armed with nuclear
weapons? What should America do if New York disappears in a mushroom cloud,
and Al Qaeda, or whoever, makes odious demands that must be met if Chicago
is not to be next?
Kind Regards,
Philip Atkinson