of your own shadow. Generalizing from a few kooks like the anti-semites at aztlan.net, or the crazies at mexica movement represents a serious lack of judgment. That, or a hate-monger. I suspect you're simply too frightened to think clearly. Aztlan.net represents at most three people, though I know only two of them. The mexica movement is bit larger, a core of one guy and two sycophants who hang around to hit on the highschool girls who fall in and out of the "movement". A more representative activity among those who seek their indigenous roots are the danzantes, e.g.,
http://www.danzantes.org/home.htm. That's what's being taught to kids today, not the stuff you're crowing about.
By the way, the UCLA link goes to a 1971 document, posted by the University as an historical resource, not in promulgation of the post's positions. If you were to read a contemporaneous political platform like a 1964 George Wallace would you consider that representative of today's Democratic Party? Of course not, you'd say it's an historical document, not a mirror of today's partisans.
You render your ire laughable by using "Hispanic." These pendejos at aztlan.net and mexica movement aren't "Hispanics". They can't be. There's no such people as "Hispanic". Here's a parallel for you. All the hubbub about Shrub and his henchassholes referring to the Democratic Party as "Democrat Party" is identical to you referring to Chicanas Chicanos Latinas Latinos as "Hispanic". It's just plain incorrect. In your defense, there's no agreement on an appropriate identity term, but a plurality of folks agree that "Hispanic" ain't right.
Here are a couple of personal counterstatements to what you misbelieve about the Chicano community.
http://readraza.comhttp://labloga.blogspot.comWhen I read your post above I can't help but think you've fallen off the edge. Maybe you're having a bad day. Check out the image below of a television comikkk who went off the edge, too. You sound a lot like this fool:
I hope you feel better soon.
ate,
mvs