Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EXXON Asks Supreme Court To Review Federal Court's Ruling On 1989 Valdez Spill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:40 AM
Original message
EXXON Asks Supreme Court To Review Federal Court's Ruling On 1989 Valdez Spill
Biggest story in Alaska today bound to be Exxon’s decision to take the punitive damage judgement they’ve been fighting for 13 years to the U.S. Supreme Court:

Exxon takes spill appeal to the Supreme Court
1989 OIL SPILL: Company asks the Supreme Court to review punitive damages.

By ELIZABETH BLUEMINK
ebluemink@adn.com

Published: August 22, 2007
Last Modified: August 22, 2007 at 04:28 AM

Exxon Mobil Corp. has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review a federal court's ruling that the company owes $2.5 billion in punitive damages for the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill.

This is the energy giant's final attempt to overturn the judgment, which Exxon has been battling for more than a decade.

In May, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco denied Exxon's request for another hearing in the long-running civil case. The company has been appealing since 1994, when an Anchorage jury awarded $5 billion in punitive damages to the class-action plaintiffs, who claim economic harm from the spill of nearly 11 million gallons of crude oil in Prince William Sound.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs have said that roughly 20 percent of their clients have died during the lawsuit. The living plaintiffs include about 33,000 commercial fishermen, cannery workers, landowners, Natives, local governments and businesses.

http://www.adn.com/money/industries/oil/story/9241259p-9156734c.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. so the record oil rape profits of late aren't enough to make them suck it up and pay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can you predict the ruling?
I can.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Watch them overturn it.
:grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. 1 in 5 of the plaintiffs have died??? If Exxon waits long enough all
the plaintiffs will be a mute point. Is there no end to the oil industry's greed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ceile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why can't they just take responsibilty and let it go?
I know that is a truly naive question, but they caused so much damage and destruction. Deal w/ it and move on!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. So the plaintiffs are dying...
what about the environment that the plaintiffs live in. That's all better now, right? :sarcasm:

SCOTUS overturns this one, I think there are a few more individuals to add to the impeachment list. Bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Lucky for EXXON that the SCOTUS are bootlickers of the BFEE now
Edited on Wed Aug-22-07 09:54 AM by rurallib
WHy was 2004 such an important election?
edit to add - I feel so sorry for Ginsberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe that little Toady Robertson can copy and paste some Federalist Society talking points into an
opinion and have all of the Tucker Carlsons of the world bowing to his extraordinary intellect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC