Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EX-BUSH SPOKESMAN BLAMES CARTER FOR IRAN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 08:07 AM
Original message
EX-BUSH SPOKESMAN BLAMES CARTER FOR IRAN
In latest twist, former Bush spokesman blames Carter for Iran

David Edwards and Muriel Kane
Published: Thursday August 23, 2007


"When we see all the missteps (in Iraq) ... it makes it harder, does it not, for the American people to trust this administration moving forward?" Scarborough asked Fleischer.

"Look at the other side," Fleischer answered. "I could blame Jimmy Carter for creating the mullahs and the ayatollahs in Iran."

"But Jimmy Carter's not president right now," said Scarborough. "Jimmy Carter's not saying 'Trust me.' George Bush is."

"You have to make decisions today based on events today," insisted Fleishcher. "Do the politicians switch their votes, where last year and the year before they supported fully funding the war against terror? Well, they've switched their votes now and cut and run. That's the current debate."

more at:
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Fleischer_blames_Congress_for_lack_of_0823.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. why not blame Eisenhower?
Wasn't it during his term that the CIA overthrew a democratically elected government and installed the Shah?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wasn't Eisenhower president in 1953?
When the CIA engineered the overthrow of the elected government and installed the Shah?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah yeah, bring the Shah back, he was such a great guy.
Why not blame the Shah for Iran, wasn't he the guy in charge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. The one thing we know for sure when the guilty start pointing fingers
is that they know the situation is lost. Now it's time to try to deflect the blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. Aren't they great? The U.S. started messing with Iran before Carter.
Edited on Fri Aug-24-07 08:21 AM by higher class
They twist and squeeze and bend and loop to plant an idea or slam that comes short of libel. They have no ethics. None. I think scientists should register a new species for these people. It's an insult to every mammal, reptile, winged thing to use their name when describing these people. It's also an insult to sewers to reference where they reside.

An aside: Anyone think Fleischer might return to the Press Room for the remainder? Why is he coming out of 'retirement' to put his face out there so frequently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. You could, Ari, but you would be wrong (again)
Edited on Fri Aug-24-07 08:37 AM by JHB
In fact, you would be demonstrating precisely the sort of ignorance and incompetence regarding actual policy that has been the hallmark of the Bush administration from Day 1.

(Of course, calling it "ignorance and incompetence" assumes that their stated goals bore any relation to their actual goals. Which is not something that can be taken for granted from an administration that's also famous for lying almost reflexively.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm so dizzy...
spin some more spider-man


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. Will Dubya's presidency ever start?
Every last one of their missteps, blunders, fatal mistakes and outright criminality is always someone else's fault, like that when they got there, or otherwise not something they're responsible for. Fleischer's lucky he was sitting across the table from Mr. Dead Intern and not someone who would have popped him in the beezer for being such a dissembling tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. They can't claim responsibility for their own erections, either. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kissinger and David Rockefeller pressed Carter to allow the Shah of Iran to enter the USA to seek
Edited on Fri Aug-24-07 09:04 AM by shain from kane
medical treatment. He followed their advice, and ended up with a crisis on his hands, and, apparently, blame for the reaction over 25 years ago. Reagan 8 years, Bush 41 4 years, and Bush 43 7 years haven't seemed to improve the situation.
Oh, and by the way, Carter also brought Israel and Egypt together for the Camp David Accords. Missing in action since that date are Reagan, Bush 41, and Bush 43.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. Do these idiots ever listen to themselves? Does Ari mean that in the next 30 years, we have
free rein to blame every international problem on Bush's Folly in Iraq? I can't wait to see how this little invasion, total destruction, refugee problem, and occupation of Iraq is going to play out over that time period. Doesn't he think Bush's actions have conseqences? Or just those of prior administrations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. Mullah?
title given to some Islamic clergy. So Jimmy Carter founded the Islamic religion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. george bu$h*,,,,,trust me? bwahahahahahahahahahahahhaaaaa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. Nuh-uh! It was Washington's fault!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC