|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:34 PM Original message |
From Kos: "We Are Going To Hit Iran, Bigtime" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. This again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
31. Find me some, please - I'd like to see how specific they were a few months ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. There was an uproar in April and January. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwb970 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 11:20 AM Response to Reply #34 |
73. Several gave specific dates. Those dates have passed. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 04:12 AM Response to Reply #31 |
65. C'mon. We've had a whole mess of these. You really want me to search the archives? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
81. Yes. This again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-03-07 08:47 AM Response to Reply #1 |
89. TPM - Anatomy of a Rumour that Must be Taken Seriously... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. Kos has some interesting blogs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes, its a media strategy I call innocluation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I don't think the public is resigned to this at all. I think a large number are ignorant as hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. No, I think that all of these 'leaks' lead to people KNOWING that it's all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INDIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 11:07 AM Response to Reply #3 |
70. yeah, it's a conspiracy. OR... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
R_M (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. Does Bush have permission to do this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. YES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Doesn't the House have to agree with the Senate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. No n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. YES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:02 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. HERE even though I all ready did post this up thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
37. May I repeat this? When did the senate reconvene? And Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. This was voted on July 11, 07 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. The administration included a sort of "escape" clause e.g.,...escaping congressional approval. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:10 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. I think I can find it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:33 AM Response to Reply #41 |
58. I used to track this vital information. My recollection is Jan/Feb 2003. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-03-07 10:16 AM Response to Reply #40 |
91. The IWR left the door wide open for an Iran attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rustydad (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-03-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #91 |
92. LINK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Maybe he has a Gulf of Tonkin incident planned that will give him cover to do this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Congress has said over and over NO NO NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 09:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. He's the Unitary Executive! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. As a US citizen, do YOU give him permission to do this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. ALL THE SENATORS GAVE THEIR PERMISSION |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Assuming that's true, than 'we' have the wrong representation, don't we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. 'we' have the wrong representation, don't we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:08 AM Response to Reply #23 |
55. What does "Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the use of force against Iran" mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:32 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. The formal war declaration against Iran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:27 AM Response to Reply #25 |
57. that's not a declaration of war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. The 2005 U.S. State Department FINDING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Ehm, thank you Alberto...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. I sure hope you don't think I agree with this going to war with Iran thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. It DOES seem like it..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:17 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Oh no no way do I want this to happen sorry you got that impression |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:22 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. The PEOPLE are gonna stop it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:40 AM Response to Reply #51 |
59. I thought that, too,...when I was among millions trying to stop the Iraq war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NuttyFluffers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 01:34 AM Response to Reply #51 |
63. if the people are gonna stop them they'd have already been stopped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 04:38 AM Response to Reply #16 |
66. No they didn't. Look the Resolution is bad enough but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 07:07 AM Response to Reply #6 |
68. He thinks he does, thats all that matters now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leeroysphitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
18. Sorry but why would a LSO have that kind information? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
32. She also said she is a she and exactly where, so very traceable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phrogman (940 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
87. I agree, nothing but scuttlebutt bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
20. I was on a warship off the coast of Iran in '79. Every DAY they told us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. wasn't there some hostages being held there then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Yes, my point is, the people on the ships are the absolutely LAST source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. In general, that's a fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:47 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. The two fastest objects in the Army was rumors and stink. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:30 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Are the top generals willing to go along with at least 5K Troops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:39 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Sure, b/c they don't understand it......If you're not into this 'nwo'/globalization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Don't forget the Russians, Chinese and India! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #24 |
79. Unfortunately... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1776Forever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
35. If this is true - and it well might be - can you say draft? Say a prayer if you are inclined. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pierzin (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:14 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. Wherever Bush goes, death follows, says Mike Malloy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:01 AM Response to Reply #35 |
54. If an iran attack occurs, it will be air, missle and navel. They won't send in regular ground forces |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snarkturian Clone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
38. Not to rain on your parade or anything... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. No, it opens "pandora's box" .....and every sane/thinking person KNOWS THAT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. And do you know how long "they" talked about invading Iraq? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. thank you for illustrating the essence of a red herring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:46 AM Response to Reply #38 |
60. All you are saying is,...you are incapable of predicting what this administration will do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
82. During the Clinton administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pingzing58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
43. Blood on the hands of Nancy Pelosy and every Dem that succumbs to evil! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
48. Hooray for Hillary!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Babsbrain (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
50. I wish to God we had someone to tell us what to do n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:31 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Follow 'babs'.......follow the pearls...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryanus (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-01-07 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
53. so did the LSO just send an email or what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:21 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Seemed to imply it was a phone call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #56 |
75. Not to mention that "galley" refers to the KITCHEN, not the dining room. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-03-07 04:10 AM Response to Reply #75 |
88. Nice catch! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adsos Letter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
61. I agree with those who question the legitimacy of the source... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chomskyite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:57 AM Response to Original message |
62. This is garbage. Misinformation or Maccabees' delusions of grandeur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #62 |
77. Agreed, and posted something below, just not spelling it out like you did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CGowen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 03:22 AM Response to Original message |
64. Maybe she was just reading the Times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 04:38 AM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Are the Iranian Govt. folk stupid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #67 |
83. Ahmedinajad seems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
69. Yep! Scott Ritter was just talking about this on c-span this morning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrs. Overall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #69 |
71. I heard Scott Ritter a few months ago on Democracy Now, saying we wouldn't attack Iran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Well aparently he's changed his mind. He was on Book TV this morning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrs. Overall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #72 |
74. I'll look for the repeat. It makes me feel very discouraged that Ritter has changed his mind-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #72 |
86. the date was a few days ago, the 28th i believe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
76. This is laughable bullshit. Don't believe a word of it. Do believe that we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #76 |
80. I agree nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
78. Date of attack?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
84. I wish I didn't know Bush asked anyone not staying the rest of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
85. Kos has posted about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnnInLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-03-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
90. Markos himself discredited the poster and the post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC