|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 01:50 PM Original message |
SWANSON After Downing Street: Secret to Forcing Compliance With Subpoenas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. inherent contempt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
2. Send a note to aWoL "If you want your AG to even have a hearing comply with all the subpoenas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 06:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
23. Just heard Leahy on VPR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. Deleted message |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
4. YES!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 02:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. U: "These impeachments could take a day. Do one before lunch and one after. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Yeah I love that part too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Bush and Cheney were not subpoenaed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I think I am the poster that responded to that question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Why the Nixon case was different & other legal opinions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-03-07 12:43 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I am only reading the actual statute: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-03-07 12:52 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. The affirmative defense mentioned applies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-03-07 02:05 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Right, Bush did not want these people to testify, and told them so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
5. Let alll your congresscritters know about Option #4--This could actually work! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreakinDJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 02:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Time to Impeach - Constitutional Crisis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananarepublican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-03-07 07:08 AM Response to Reply #5 |
19. Seems like an iron-clad strategy to get to the bottom of a few things. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. Oh hell yeah. . BACK up to the top of the greatest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreakinDJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. Has anyone drafted a letter demanding option #4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
9. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-02-07 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. Such defiance...guess the WH thinks we'll forget ! K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-03-07 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
20. The options: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-03-07 10:30 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Better yet, impeach for crimes, then they have to answer the supoenas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-04-07 06:37 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. There is no executive privelege for crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 03:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC