Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton: Midas touch at work

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:18 PM
Original message
Hillary Clinton: Midas touch at work
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/MutualFunds/HillaryClintonMidasTouchAtWork.aspx

After eight years as first lady and six as a New York senator, this presidential candidate is very rich -- but looking at a big tax bill next year.

Hillary Clinton caused a stir in the early 1990s, when it was revealed that the first lady, in 1978, had turned $1,000 into $100,000 in 10 months by trading cattle futures as the wife of Arkansas' attorney general.

These days, that gain would barely register in her portfolio, which has grown as large as $50 million, according to a campaign-disclosure filing with the Federal Election Commission.

Clinton has never lost her Midas touch. As much as $25 million of the current total was contained in a blind trust that the Democratic presidential candidate and her husband established in 1993, when Bill Clinton became president. The trust was valued at just $1 million when it was established.

-----------------------

The vanishing portfolio

The trust was dissolved earlier this year after its holdings were disclosed and immediately drew fire from activists because of numerous holdings in corporations unpopular among left-wing Democrats, including pharmaceutical, oil and defense companies, as well as Wal-Mart Stores (WMT, news, msgs) -- where Hillary Clinton served on the board from 1986 to 1992 -- and Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. (NWS, news, msgs).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't suppose there's any way to stop her?
There's no way that neo-lib DLC stool pigeon's going to come even close to representing us. She sold out to big business, that's who she'll represent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. oil and defense companies???
that would explain her IWR vote. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh my God -
this is awful. Not.

Couldn't help but notice your post did not mention the tax hit they took - even though they didn't need to.

Earlier today all of the Edward's supporters were claiming that the Susan E. column was a high piece placed by Hillary's supporters. I guess, therefore, it would be accurate to say this is a hit piece placed by John Edwards with his hedge fund buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The first sentence of the article:
After eight years as first lady and six as a New York senator, this presidential candidate is very rich -- but looking at a big tax bill next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. nice hit job
from the same article:

Clinton has, however, taken public positions at odds with her investments. Most famously, early in her husband's presidency she proposed a national health insurance program that was intended, in part, to limit profits of pharmaceutical companies.

She outlined a plan last year to impose $50 billion in new taxes on oil companies, including an "excess profits" tax. Also last year, she returned a $5,000 contribution from Wal-Mart's political-action committee, criticizing the company's limited employee benefits.

----------------------------

And, in case anyone has any objective interest in what a blind trust entails:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_trust

A blind trust is a trust in which the executors or those who have been given power of attorney have full discretion over the assets, and the trust beneficiaries have no knowledge of the holdings of the trust. Blind trusts are generally used when a trustor wishes to keep the beneficiary unaware of the specific assets in the trust, such as to avoid conflict of interest between the beneficiary and the investments. Politicians often place their personal assets (including investment income) into blind trusts, to avoid public scrutiny and accusations of conflicts of interest when they direct government funds to the private sector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC