Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New law protects 'good faith' reports of terrorist activity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:41 PM
Original message
New law protects 'good faith' reports of terrorist activity
Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Say you're traveling on an airplane and you notice some other passengers behaving in a suspicious manner -- acting nervous, looking around furtively, conferring in a language you don't understand and a manner you find frightening.

Under a new federal law, you can report your concerns to the crew without fear of being sued by the subjects of your complaint, even if the suspicions turn out to be unfounded.

The little-noticed "good faith" law was passed by Congress on July 27 as part of a sweeping homeland security bill implementing recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.

... The measure was made retroactive to Sept. 1, 2006, specifically to negate a lawsuit filed by six Muslim clerics against unnamed passengers who complained about them.

... The "good faith" amendment was co-written by Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn.

Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07245/813550-37.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. bigotry and fear codified into law--why am I not surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. isn't there a specific section in the constitution that disallows making
laws retroactive?

Article 1, Section 9: No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

Isn't that exactly what this refers to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think that is making something legal illegal and retroactive.
This is making something illegal legal retroactively.

It was a crime, but now isn't. How nice of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't think it was a crime, but you were liable.
But, I think what you're right about it - the law can remove liability. From wikipedia:

A law may have an ex post facto effect without being technically ex post facto. For example, when a law repeals a previous law, the repealed legislation no longer applies to the situations it once did, even if such situations arose before the law was repealed. The principle of prohibiting the continued application of these kinds of laws is also known as Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Luckily this won't be wide open for abuse
Edited on Tue Sep-04-07 02:11 PM by IDemo
Since our government will be happy to define "good faith".

:silly: :wtf: :crazy: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. wouldn't the much-ballyooed bill of rights trump this nonsense?
of course, with bush's pet supreme court who knows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC