Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cooked-up Feith "intel" leaked to flagship of right-wing rags, The Weekly Standard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 12:39 AM
Original message
Cooked-up Feith "intel" leaked to flagship of right-wing rags, The Weekly Standard
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/10/opinion/10sat1.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

<snip>

The false information included a meeting in Prague in April 2001 between an Iraqi official and Mohamed Atta, one of the 9/11 pilots. It never happened. But Mr. Feith’s report said it did, and Mr. Cheney will still not admit that the story is false.

In a statement released yesterday, Senator Carl Levin, the new chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, who has been dogged in pursuit of the truth about the Iraqi intelligence, noted that the cooked-up Feith briefing had been leaked to the conservative Weekly Standard magazine so Mr. Cheney could quote it as the “best source” of information about the supposed Iraq-Qaeda link.

The Pentagon report is one step in a long-delayed effort to figure out how the intelligence on Iraq was so badly twisted — and by whom. That work should have been finished before the 2004 elections, and it would have been if Pat Roberts, the obedient Republican who ran the Senate Intelligence Committee, had not helped the White House drag it out and load it in ways that would obscure the truth.

It is now up to Mr. Levin and Senator Jay Rockefeller, the current head of the intelligence panel, to give Americans the answers. Mr. Levin’s desire to have the entire inspector general’s report on the Feith scheme declassified is a good place to start. But it will be up to Mr. Rockefeller to finally determine how old, inconclusive, unsubstantiated and false intelligence was transformed into fresh, reliable and definitive reports — and then used by Mr. Bush and other top officials to drag the country into a disastrous and unnecessary war.

....more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Feith won't admit it was lie either. Wotta surprise, eh?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. He is a neocon and all they do is lie. Seriously, it's part of their ideology. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Here's a good example:
http://www.calblog.com/archives/003526.html

My brother (Coast Guard vet, and Neocon worshiper) always tosses the Bekah Valley story out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Funny you mentioned that. I posted about that story on this thread earlier. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. It goes deeper than ideology, it's ingrained. They don't even think of it as lying,
it's just the way their brains function. Truth and facts are enemies that must be defeated. I can't explain it, but I damn sure can recognize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. If you've studied their ideology, it revolves around lying. They are the elite and
Edited on Sat Feb-10-07 01:08 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
will rule the govt by lying to the masses as the masses don't have the intelligence to make decisions for themselves. So they tell the peons what they believe the peons want to hear and then go about and do whatever they damned well please. Personally, I believe they are all delusional sociopaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Doesn't a sociopath -have- to be a liar? How else could they rationalize
their behavior?...they even believe their OWN lies. Which, come to think of it, actually defines them.
I guess, to be brutally honest, we all hear what we want to hear, to some degree - it's easier than thinking. That might be an inevitable result of having it too easy. The phrase 'spoiled rotten' comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. I am assuming that you read PNAC...did you ever envision these
Neocons sitting around all day as "spoiled rotten" kids playing the game Risk? Moving the pieces around to take over the world. I pictured them doing that. I also figure that's why, once they "conquered" Iraq, they didn't have a clue what to do. Risk doesn't haven't plans for reconstruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. You're right about lying being part of neocon ideology
I see it all the time. For example, when I get one of those broadcast neocon hate emails and prove it to be a string of lies (easy to do) by citing Snopes or some other source, the sender never expresses any form of regret. They never send out a followup to all recipients to correct the lie they have repeated, and often express a sort of pride for having perpetrated the myth.

To them being liars is not a negative or even a neutral, it is a virtue if it does anything at all to further acceptance of their ideologies or slander those who oppose them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They don't call it a lie. He calls it something like a summary
The thing is these guys tried in every way possible to only show what they wanted. They let their ideology dictate the evidence. They threw out or ignored what they didn't like, like things that contradicted all of the facts. They picked the evidence they wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly...the ends justify the means.
For our own good, no doubt. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. He's claiming his DOD gang wasn't doing 'intel' when they challenged the CIA's iintel
but can't explain how they could actually DO that without having intel of their own. So his only recourse is to lie which is SOP for assholes of his ilk.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Followers of Leo Strauss believe lies are justified for the outcome desired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. When they didn't find WMD in Iraq, Feith then created a story that the WMD were sent over
to Syria and had the Weekly Standard publish it. Every now and then you will hear Bushbots talk about it.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. And Brian Lamb has Andrew Ferguson on this morning....
from The Weekly Standard? Does he not know they have no credibility?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I caught a glimpse as I was cspan surfing for the Armed Services committee hearing, saw Weekly
Standard and kept surfing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. I guess that it is long forgotten that the leaked information apparently
was classified. Years ago it was feared that feith was going to go to jail. I wonder what happened to all of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. He's out of government...home free, basically.
If, as is claimed, no actual laws were broken, he has no (legal) problems to worry about.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. morning kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
20. Thanks for the post! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC