Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dick Cheney--the 4th branch of government?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 03:27 PM
Original message
Dick Cheney--the 4th branch of government?
From Digby:

"When I asked if Cheney had "found" a fourth branch of government in position that until a decade or so ago was considered a seat warmer for a presidential run and the designated state funeral stand-in for the president, I didn't realize they were actually setting this forth as a legal argument. Dear God.

"This means that he considers himself even more "unitary" than he considers the president, beyond all reach of either branch, answerable to no one.

"Cheney is refusing to comply with a presidential executive order. What do you suppose the Empty Codpiece feels about this? Does he know that his Vice president believes he has an independent office that doesn't answer to him or anyone else?

"But maybe Junior likes being publicly humiliated by Dick Cheney. He seems to have a very high tolerance for looking like one of history's most memorable horses asses, so who knows?""


http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2007_02_01_digbysblog_archive.html#117107982670783759

Impeach him, already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. He thinks that he's the only branch of government.
Much less the fourth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And he's already told Congress and all of us: "Go f--k yourself."
Our congresscritters are afraid of their own shadows, leaving us wishing that the Constitution contained a provision allowing the citizens to require a recall vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohioINC Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Head of State vs. Head of Government
Cheney has been the head of Government while Bush is the head of state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Cheney has created a Chancellery out of the VP seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tyrant -- Despot -- A-Hole
Let's have his name (Chainy) reflect his (upcoming) position...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rakovsky Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. CHECKS AND BALANCES
Yes, that is why there was no ban on homosexual marriage!

Bush proposed a ban 2 years ago, Congress was uncertain, but then Cheney vetoed it (considers questions about his daughter "inappropriate") before Bush could get conservatives to push their congresspeople.

Yes, it really happened like that. At least if you think that Bush really cared about homosexual marriage in the first place.


Kind of ironic that an ultra-conservative vice-president could have a gay daughter raising a child from an unknown father, and think even questions about it are "inappropriate." That's right, liberal media, back off the family values vice-president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, that's obviously something the pundits missed when they were
pushing George Bush as a man just smart enough to realize how dumb he was, so he would know to surround himself by intelligent, experienced people. The one factor we overlooked, is that one of these intelligent, experienced people would take over. And that's what happened.

So, I resolve that the next time we find a candidate who isn't qualified for the job, DON'T PLUG HIS CANDIDACY!

Thank you, Chris Matthews, for nuthin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC