Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CHENEY (1975): "Start FBI Investigation (Target-S. Hersh & NYT)-With Or Without-Public Announcement"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:55 AM
Original message
CHENEY (1975): "Start FBI Investigation (Target-S. Hersh & NYT)-With Or Without-Public Announcement"
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 10:56 AM by kpete
Cheney’s To-Do Lists, Then and Now



RETURNING to the White House after the Memorial Day weekend in 1975, the young aide Dick Cheney found himself handling a First Amendment showdown. The New York Times had published an article by Seymour M. Hersh about an espionage program, and the White House chief of staff, Donald H. Rumsfeld, was demanding action.

Dick Cheney’s notes from 1975 concerning Seymour Hersh's New York Times article. Out came the yellow legal pad, and in his distinctively neat, deliberate hand, Mr. Cheney laid out the “problem,” “goals” while addressing it, and “options.” These last included “Start FBI investigation — with or w/o public announcement. As targets include NYT, Sy Hersh, potential gov’t sources.”

Mr. Cheney’s notes, now in the Gerald R. Ford presidential library, collected and synthesized the views of lawyers, diplomats, spies and military officials, but his own views shine through. He is hostile to the press and to Congress, insistent on the prerogatives of the executive branch and adamant about the importance of national security secrets.

Fast forward three decades and that same handwriting appears on a copy of the Op-Ed article in The Timeshttp://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/14/washington/14cheney.html?ex=1305259200&en=c54c5e1ae33e0834&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss that set in motion events that led to the perjury trial of I. Lewis Libby, Vice President Cheney’s former chief of staff.

more at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/11/weekinreview/11liptak.html?_r=2&ref=weekinreview&oref=slogin&oref=slogin


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cheney has broken his oath of office
He has no respect for the Constitution, and would rather have a dictatorship, which he has now in fact, if not in name. He's only using the veneer of Constitutional government to hide the fact he wants all power to himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Anyone here know how to do a handwriting analysis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Well I slept at a Holiday Inn last night
and that looks like the handwriting of
a mean nasty greedy old man who
truly hates all that is good in this world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Darth DICK probably wishes he had Hersh "taken care of" back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. what a RAT BASTARD!
Cheney needs to go. Just goes to show you, Hersh has been the man since forever.

K&R!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Cheney has always been EVIL. He is only a Million or so kills different than Hitler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wonder where this will go? Does Fitz know? Would it matter?
Or, is this something that will finally get an Independent Counsel to invistigate efforts of massive itimidation?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. In the Ford years, the Secret Service's nickname for Cheney was Backseat
We forget how long Cheney has been around the WHite House, and in what capacities.




Here's an excerpt from Rise of the Vulcans. The author, James Mann, is discussing Cheney's job as Ford's deputy chief of staff, describing how he took care of mundane duties such as making sure the plumbing in the WH worked (literally), etc.



During the Ford years, the Secret Service gave Richard Cheney perhaps the most apt code name it had ever derived, Backseat. That was a perfect description of Cheney's role as an anonymous White House functionary.

Cheney's ascent in the Ford White House served as an illustration of how an individual can rise to the top by virtue of his willingness to take care of the mundane chores that persons with larger egos avoid, thereby establishing reliability and learning all the inner workings of an organization. Cheney was akin to the clerk who becomes chief executive, the copy editor who rises to become editor in chief, the accountant who takes over the film studio.

The archives of the period show how Cheney, as deputy chief of staff, started out in the Ford administration by supervising such lowly matters as plumbing and toilets:

Memorandum for: Dick Cheney
From: Jerry Jones
Oct. 12, 1974
We will be unable in the short term to fix the drainage problem in the sink in the first floor bathroom. The White House plumbing is very old, and we have had the GSA (the General Services Administration) working for some time to figure out how to improve this problem. Hopefully (sic) it will be done soon...


It was Cheney who oversaw the sending out of WHite House Christmas cards and gifts. When Betty Ford was uncomfortable on a White House helicopter, it fell to Cheney to try to get a headrest installed at her seat. Cheney even took care of the WHite House table settings.

Memorandum for : Jerry Jones
From: Dick Cheney
Feb. 19, 1975
It seems that there are salt shakers in the Residence which are used for the Congressional meals (little dishes of salt with funny little spoons). Is there some reason that regular salt shakers are not used for small breakfasts and small stag dinners?


Others soon discovered, as Rumsfeld already knew, that when you gave something to Cheney, it got done -- not flashily but competently. He was the perfect staff man. He worked longer hours than almost everyone else. "The individual who'll join the staff and who'll want to work nine-to-five and maybe see a little cocktail party circuit isn't there when you need him," Cheney told one interviewer.

It wasn't long before Cheney was taking over larger, more important assignments, standing in as Rumsfeld's alter ego when the chief of staff was occupied elsewhere. One natural area for Cheney was intelligence: He was trustworthy, faceless and unfailingly discreet. During the Ford years the CIA was trying to fend off an unending series of press and congressional investigations and, with them, efforts by the Justice Department to establish new rules and guidelines to govern intelligence collection. In May 1975 the New York Times published a story by Seymour Hersh describing the US intelligence community's secret effort to lift a sunken Soviet submarine off the seabed in the Pacific Ocean. Cheney was in charge of the meetings aimed at trying to figure out if the Ford administration should take legal action against the newspaper. Cheney's handwritten notes show that he actively considered a number of countermeasures, such as seeking an indictment of Hersh and the Times or even obtaining a warrant to search Hersh's apartment. The aim, Cheney wrote, was "to discourage the NYT and other publications from similar actions." In the end Cheney and the White House decided to back off after the intelligence community decided its work had not been significantly damaged. Rise of the Vulcans, James Mann, pp 59-61


And another excerpt:

If anyone in America had the government experience to respond to a terrorist attack upon Washington, it was Cheney. As President Ford's deputy chief of staff and then chief of staff, Cheney had mastered the inner workings of White House operations right down to the salt shakers and plumbing. In Congress he had worked on the House Intelligence Committee, learning how the CIA and America's several other intelligence agencies operate. As defense secretary he had been in charge of the U.S. armed forces. Above all, although almost nobody knew it, during the 1980s Cheney had been one of the leading participants in the highly classified planning to maintain continuity of government and set up a new presidential chain of command if America was under attack.Rise of the Vulcans, James Mann, p.295


For more on the Cheney/Rumsfeld clandestine continuation of government drills, see this old post on one of H2O Man's old thread, "Your Move....":
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=321233#325717
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's a good read......and links to "PBS Frontline" REPORT are good
from the article! Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC