Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain is polling at, what, 4-5%? Why is he ALL OVER the "liberal media" but Kucinich is nowhere????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:30 PM
Original message
McCain is polling at, what, 4-5%? Why is he ALL OVER the "liberal media" but Kucinich is nowhere????
:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Actually
in most polls, McCain's around 15%-20%.

Kucinich is at 1%-2%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Scewed or screwed polls you are looking at and Dennis is soooooooooooooo heads many heads above him
why bother to be be bothered with a crappy poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's not A crappy poll
I looked at a few. McCain was polling in almost all between 15% and 22%.

And I'm not bothered by it - I'm just responding to the factual error in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. crappy poll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. My post links to a bunch of polls
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 10:03 PM by MonkeyFunk
Which one is crappy?

or are they all crappy because you don't like what they say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R & VERY GOOD POINT!
Never thought of it that way -- you're right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I want the answer for this toooooooo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is Kucinich also at 4-5%?
If he is, you've got a good point. But poster #1 claims the situation is actually very different. It would help if one or both of you could provide a link in support of your claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Here's a bunch of polls
showing McCain at 15-22%

http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08rep.htm


Here's a bunch showing Kucinich at 1-2%

http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08dem.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Well, I was going off of the post-debate polls. Like the recent one from ABC w/Dennis as the winner.
It seems the "liberal media" and its pollsters has even excluded Kucinich's name in some of the polls (www.pollingreport.com)

No wonder.

He's a threat to the American Corporatocracy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Or, the simpler, more rational reason
is that he's just not that important.

If he won Iowa, he'd be on the cover of Time and Newsweek. If he started raising any appreciable money and rising in the polls, he'd get attention.

Nobody's afraid of Dennis Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Because the media has done its job of marginalizing him.
While they paint Obama as some sort of Second Coming for the Democratic Party yet has almost nothing of substance or detail behind him. He's playing it safe right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Is that true of other candidates
who get little attention?

Are they afraid of Chris Dodd? Tom Tancredo? Alan Keyes? Ole Savior? Or do they not get much attention because they have little to no chance of actually winning anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Keyes just announced over the weekend. Dodd has been on Meet the Press several times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Yes, but he's also a Senator
But Keyes ran for President twice before, and he didn't get wide coverage in those runs. Dodd also happens to be a sitting US senator, and they are frequently on Meet the Press. But I never see Dodd much of anywhere else.

So you think the dozens or hundreds of news outlets in the country ALL conspire to keep DK down, and not ONE enterprising reporter can produce a memo or a phone message indicating this?

Isn't it just more likely that he's not important right now? If he started getting money and polling numbers, he WOULD get more media attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. So, to you, a good candidate is one who can raise the most money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. No, not the most money
but SOME money.

If you can't raise any money, you have no hope of winning. That's the truth.


Now... back to the point at hand. Do you agree that McCain and Kucinich do not have similar poll numbers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yes, I do. But, McCain was in single digits in some polls last month.
And I won't be surprised to see him back down there soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. DK ran in 2004 and couldn't get 10 pecent in Ohio
where he has name recognition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. yep, and they excluded other Dems and other repubs
Most of the polls do include DK, but AP doesn't nor does CBS. But AP also excluded several repubs from their poll of repub candidates, limiting the number of choices to 7 candidates in both the repub and Democratic polls. And CBS limited the number of candidates in their polls for both parties as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. Too many people in America like some here on DU refuse...
to open their eyes to whats happening to our country and to their rights, so we will probably never see a candidate that speaks for the people as president ever again. The sad part is I cant even protect my own rights because these Americans when they talk, sound like the media has paid them, when its just their ignorance has allowed the media to brainwash them and form their thoughts. Reality is there and some refuse to see what is happening? You would think with the country continuing to head in a downward spiral, some would wake up and realize that the media and most of our politicians are only concerned with staying in power and wealth, they are not concerned with those same people that spread their agenda without even knowing they are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Aren't you getting the feeling that the entire process is rigged
and that we only think we have choices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Ayup...sounds an awful lot like the last election in Iran, eh?
No need to invade them. They already have our democracy!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. This Is A Trick Question, Sir, Right? There Is No 'Liberal Media'....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Which is really the point I was trying to get across. Thank you.
You'd *think* if the media were liberal they'd be focusing on the most progressive candidate amongst the Dem candidates and that would easily be Kucinich.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Happy To Help, Sir
The 'liberal media' is one of the great myths, the 'big lie', even, of our time....

"Reality has a liberal bias."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. Two reasons:
It's a much further fall for McCain: He was the putative front runner as recently as last year, and:

the media has fun with big implosions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. because...
he *was* an extremely popular politician. And he still commands a much wider audience than kucinich, despite his poor primary numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
25. Because the news is owned by the war machine. They must have war.
Kucinich is a threat to those who profit from war.

It's sad. We could do so much better.

I fear that if he were elected he'd be assassinated. Maybe it's best that they ignore him. How's that for the ultimate in cynicism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
26. Well the "McCain used to be popular" meme would work
....except that Dodd is getting front-row seating for television in comparison to Kucinich, but he is polling lower.

It is clear that there is a media blackout on Kucinich. As for the reason why, I can only guess, but there are sure a lot of reasons to choose from. Not the least of which is that Kucinich says the things that the media has ignored since Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
29. The problem is that your premise is untrue
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 02:51 PM by Freddie Stubbs
McCain is polling at 15% in the latest AP poll:

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iP6aoeuUCqIEo5DHDOCMLHyUOCpg

Which scientifically conducted polls show Kucinich getting anywhere that much support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Macchendra Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
32. Because he is an AIPAC tool
just like Hill Obama and Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC